如果有的话，医生在协助死亡中应该扮演什么角色？

The BMJ Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1136/bmj.q2726

H Lucy Thomas

{"title":"如果有的话，医生在协助死亡中应该扮演什么角色？","authors":"H Lucy Thomas","doi":"10.1136/bmj.q2726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The BMJ ’s coverage on assisted dying1 ignores the key question for the medical profession: what, if any, should be the role of doctors? In Leadbeater’s bill our role is central and decisive: not only do medical criteria define what constitutes an acceptable reason to end one’s life, but doctors are both the arbiters and administrators. This has several deeply problematic implications. This bill would legally require doctors to treat a patient …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What, if any, should be the role of doctors in assisted dying?\",\"authors\":\"H Lucy Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmj.q2726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The BMJ ’s coverage on assisted dying1 ignores the key question for the medical profession: what, if any, should be the role of doctors? In Leadbeater’s bill our role is central and decisive: not only do medical criteria define what constitutes an acceptable reason to end one’s life, but doctors are both the arbiters and administrators. This has several deeply problematic implications. This bill would legally require doctors to treat a patient …\",\"PeriodicalId\":22388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The BMJ\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The BMJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2726\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

《英国医学杂志》关于协助死亡的报道忽视了医学界的一个关键问题：如果有的话，医生应该扮演什么角色？在Leadbeater的法案中，我们的角色是核心和决定性的：不仅医学标准定义了什么是可以接受的结束生命的理由，而且医生既是仲裁者又是管理者。这有几个深层次的问题。这项法案将在法律上要求医生治疗病人……

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

What, if any, should be the role of doctors in assisted dying?

The BMJ ’s coverage on assisted dying1 ignores the key question for the medical profession: what, if any, should be the role of doctors? In Leadbeater’s bill our role is central and decisive: not only do medical criteria define what constitutes an acceptable reason to end one’s life, but doctors are both the arbiters and administrators. This has several deeply problematic implications. This bill would legally require doctors to treat a patient …

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The BMJ

自引率

0.00%

发文量