在儿科急诊科实施mini-CEX。

Iris Alonso Sánchez , Sandra Morán Moya , Gemma Claret Teruel , Roser Garrido Romero , David Muñoz Santanach , Victoria Trenchs Sainz de la Maza , Carles Luaces Cubells
{"title":"在儿科急诊科实施mini-CEX。","authors":"Iris Alonso Sánchez ,&nbsp;Sandra Morán Moya ,&nbsp;Gemma Claret Teruel ,&nbsp;Roser Garrido Romero ,&nbsp;David Muñoz Santanach ,&nbsp;Victoria Trenchs Sainz de la Maza ,&nbsp;Carles Luaces Cubells","doi":"10.1016/j.anpede.2024.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The mini-CEX is a direct observation of care delivery that provides feedback to the medical resident; and previous studies have confirmed its validity, reliability, feasibility and user satisfaction. Its application in the paediatric emergency care setting is scarce.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess trends in the acquisition of emergency care skills in paediatrics residents through the mini-CEX and determine the satisfaction of participants after its implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Inclusion criteria: paediatrics residents in the first (MIR1) and second (MIR2) year of residency. Setting: emergency department. Study period: 4 years (May 2019–May 2023). Evaluated competencies: anamnesis, physical examination, professionalism, clinical judgment, communication, organization-efficiency and global assessment. Number of evaluations: maximum of 6 per resident per year; each evaluation assessed 2–3 competencies (each competency could be evaluated twice per year). The evaluators were adjunct physicians in the emergency department; medical residents were assessed for training purposes. Satisfaction was rated on a scale from 1 to 9.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 217 evaluations were performed on 54 residents (1–9 per resident). The median observation time was 16 min per visit (IQR, 14–25) and the feedback time was 10 min per visit (IQR, 7–15). The median anamnesis, physical examination, clinical judgment, organization-efficacy and global scores were 7 for MR1 and 8 for MRI2 residents (<em>P =</em> .015; <em>P =</em> .001, <em>P =</em> .076, <em>P =</em> .009 and <em>P =</em> .010, respectively). We did not find significant differences in the remaining competencies. The average satisfaction score was 9 for both evaluators and residents.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The acquisition of skills was high; with favourable outcomes observed in MRI2 relative to MRI1. The implementation of the mini-CEX was well accepted among the involved professionals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93868,"journal":{"name":"Anales de pediatria","volume":"101 6","pages":"Pages 388-392"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of the mini-CEX in a paediatric emergency department\",\"authors\":\"Iris Alonso Sánchez ,&nbsp;Sandra Morán Moya ,&nbsp;Gemma Claret Teruel ,&nbsp;Roser Garrido Romero ,&nbsp;David Muñoz Santanach ,&nbsp;Victoria Trenchs Sainz de la Maza ,&nbsp;Carles Luaces Cubells\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anpede.2024.11.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The mini-CEX is a direct observation of care delivery that provides feedback to the medical resident; and previous studies have confirmed its validity, reliability, feasibility and user satisfaction. Its application in the paediatric emergency care setting is scarce.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess trends in the acquisition of emergency care skills in paediatrics residents through the mini-CEX and determine the satisfaction of participants after its implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Inclusion criteria: paediatrics residents in the first (MIR1) and second (MIR2) year of residency. Setting: emergency department. Study period: 4 years (May 2019–May 2023). Evaluated competencies: anamnesis, physical examination, professionalism, clinical judgment, communication, organization-efficiency and global assessment. Number of evaluations: maximum of 6 per resident per year; each evaluation assessed 2–3 competencies (each competency could be evaluated twice per year). The evaluators were adjunct physicians in the emergency department; medical residents were assessed for training purposes. Satisfaction was rated on a scale from 1 to 9.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 217 evaluations were performed on 54 residents (1–9 per resident). The median observation time was 16 min per visit (IQR, 14–25) and the feedback time was 10 min per visit (IQR, 7–15). The median anamnesis, physical examination, clinical judgment, organization-efficacy and global scores were 7 for MR1 and 8 for MRI2 residents (<em>P =</em> .015; <em>P =</em> .001, <em>P =</em> .076, <em>P =</em> .009 and <em>P =</em> .010, respectively). We did not find significant differences in the remaining competencies. The average satisfaction score was 9 for both evaluators and residents.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The acquisition of skills was high; with favourable outcomes observed in MRI2 relative to MRI1. The implementation of the mini-CEX was well accepted among the involved professionals.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anales de pediatria\",\"volume\":\"101 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 388-392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anales de pediatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2341287924002837\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2341287924002837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:mini-CEX是对护理过程的直接观察,并向住院医生提供反馈;已有研究证实了该方法的有效性、可靠性、可行性和用户满意度。它在儿科急诊环境中的应用是稀缺的。目的:评估通过mini-CEX获得儿科住院医师急诊护理技能的趋势,并确定实施后参与者的满意度。材料和方法:纳入标准:住院第一年(MIR1)和第二年(MIR2)的儿科住院医师。地点:急诊科。研究时间:4年(2019年5月- 2023年5月)。评估能力:记忆、体检、专业、临床判断、沟通、组织效率和整体评估。评估次数:每位居民每年最多6次;每次评估评估2-3个能力(每个能力每年可评估两次)。评估者为急诊科的兼职医师;为培训目的对住院医生进行了评估。满意度的等级从1到9。结果:共对54名住院医师进行了217次评估(每位住院医师1-9次)。中位观察时间为16 min /次(IQR, 14-25),反馈时间为10 min /次(IQR, 7-15)。MR1组的中位记忆、体格检查、临床判断、组织效能和整体得分为7分,mr2组为8分(P = .015;P = 。001, P = 。076, P = 。009和P = 。010年,分别)。我们没有发现其他能力的显著差异。评估者和住院医师的平均满意度得分均为9分。结论:学生技能习得程度高;与MRI1相比,MRI2的结果更好。有关专业人士对小型行政会议的推行表示欢迎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Implementation of the mini-CEX in a paediatric emergency department

Implementation of the mini-CEX in a paediatric emergency department

Introduction

The mini-CEX is a direct observation of care delivery that provides feedback to the medical resident; and previous studies have confirmed its validity, reliability, feasibility and user satisfaction. Its application in the paediatric emergency care setting is scarce.

Objective

To assess trends in the acquisition of emergency care skills in paediatrics residents through the mini-CEX and determine the satisfaction of participants after its implementation.

Material and methods

Inclusion criteria: paediatrics residents in the first (MIR1) and second (MIR2) year of residency. Setting: emergency department. Study period: 4 years (May 2019–May 2023). Evaluated competencies: anamnesis, physical examination, professionalism, clinical judgment, communication, organization-efficiency and global assessment. Number of evaluations: maximum of 6 per resident per year; each evaluation assessed 2–3 competencies (each competency could be evaluated twice per year). The evaluators were adjunct physicians in the emergency department; medical residents were assessed for training purposes. Satisfaction was rated on a scale from 1 to 9.

Results

A total of 217 evaluations were performed on 54 residents (1–9 per resident). The median observation time was 16 min per visit (IQR, 14–25) and the feedback time was 10 min per visit (IQR, 7–15). The median anamnesis, physical examination, clinical judgment, organization-efficacy and global scores were 7 for MR1 and 8 for MRI2 residents (P = .015; P = .001, P = .076, P = .009 and P = .010, respectively). We did not find significant differences in the remaining competencies. The average satisfaction score was 9 for both evaluators and residents.

Conclusions

The acquisition of skills was high; with favourable outcomes observed in MRI2 relative to MRI1. The implementation of the mini-CEX was well accepted among the involved professionals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信