自我收集的阴茎金属拭子适用于并发性传播感染率高的乌干达男性的性传播感染检测。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Johan H Melendez, Adamaris Muñiz Tirado, Annet Onzia, Emmanuel Mande, Justin P Hardick, Rosalind Parkes-Ratanshi, Matthew M Hamill, Yukari C Manabe
{"title":"自我收集的阴茎金属拭子适用于并发性传播感染率高的乌干达男性的性传播感染检测。","authors":"Johan H Melendez, Adamaris Muñiz Tirado, Annet Onzia, Emmanuel Mande, Justin P Hardick, Rosalind Parkes-Ratanshi, Matthew M Hamill, Yukari C Manabe","doi":"10.1136/sextrans-2024-056330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a global health challenge. Testing is not routinely performed in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), which bear a disproportionate burden of STIs. Self-collected penile-meatal swabs (SCPMS) are an alternative to urine for STI testing, but data from LMICs are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between October 2019 and September 2020, recruited participants with urethral discharge syndrome at government health facilities in Kampala, Uganda, provided urine and SCPMS. Samples were retrospectively analysed for <i>Chlamydia trachomatis</i> (CT), <i>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</i> (NG), <i>Mycoplasma genitalium</i> (MG) and <i>Trichomonas vaginalis</i> (TV) using Aptima assays. Paired SCPMS and urine samples with discordant STI results were analysed using real-time PCR assays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 250 participants, 66.8% (n=167), 22.8% (n=57), 12.8% (n=32) and 2.4% (n=6) tested positive for NG, CT, MG and TV, respectively, on testing of their SCPMS and urine samples. The overall agreement between urine and SCPMS for all STIs using the Aptima assays was 98.7% (987/1000). After adjudication with PCR assays, the agreement between urine and SCPMS for NG, CT, MG and TV was 100% (250/250), 97.6% (244/250), 99.6% (249/250), and 99.6% (249/250), respectively. There was no significant difference between SCPMS and urine (p=0.9996). For paired samples with one STI (n=164) or ≥2 STIs (n=39), concordance was 100% (656/656) and 97.2% (175/180), respectively. There was no association between number of STIs and agreement between sample types (p=0.8606).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed a high level of agreement between SCPMS and urine for detection of STIs in symptomatic Ugandan men, even in the presence of multiple concurrent STIs. SCPMS may be a suitable alternative to urine, with ease of collection, transporting, and processing of samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":21624,"journal":{"name":"Sexually Transmitted Infections","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-collected penile-meatal swabs are suitable for the detection of STIs in Ugandan men with high rates of STI coinfections.\",\"authors\":\"Johan H Melendez, Adamaris Muñiz Tirado, Annet Onzia, Emmanuel Mande, Justin P Hardick, Rosalind Parkes-Ratanshi, Matthew M Hamill, Yukari C Manabe\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/sextrans-2024-056330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a global health challenge. Testing is not routinely performed in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), which bear a disproportionate burden of STIs. Self-collected penile-meatal swabs (SCPMS) are an alternative to urine for STI testing, but data from LMICs are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between October 2019 and September 2020, recruited participants with urethral discharge syndrome at government health facilities in Kampala, Uganda, provided urine and SCPMS. Samples were retrospectively analysed for <i>Chlamydia trachomatis</i> (CT), <i>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</i> (NG), <i>Mycoplasma genitalium</i> (MG) and <i>Trichomonas vaginalis</i> (TV) using Aptima assays. Paired SCPMS and urine samples with discordant STI results were analysed using real-time PCR assays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 250 participants, 66.8% (n=167), 22.8% (n=57), 12.8% (n=32) and 2.4% (n=6) tested positive for NG, CT, MG and TV, respectively, on testing of their SCPMS and urine samples. The overall agreement between urine and SCPMS for all STIs using the Aptima assays was 98.7% (987/1000). After adjudication with PCR assays, the agreement between urine and SCPMS for NG, CT, MG and TV was 100% (250/250), 97.6% (244/250), 99.6% (249/250), and 99.6% (249/250), respectively. There was no significant difference between SCPMS and urine (p=0.9996). For paired samples with one STI (n=164) or ≥2 STIs (n=39), concordance was 100% (656/656) and 97.2% (175/180), respectively. There was no association between number of STIs and agreement between sample types (p=0.8606).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed a high level of agreement between SCPMS and urine for detection of STIs in symptomatic Ugandan men, even in the presence of multiple concurrent STIs. SCPMS may be a suitable alternative to urine, with ease of collection, transporting, and processing of samples.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexually Transmitted Infections\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexually Transmitted Infections\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2024-056330\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexually Transmitted Infections","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2024-056330","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:性传播感染(STIs)是一个全球性的健康挑战。在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)没有常规进行检测,这些国家承受着不成比例的性传播感染负担。自行收集的阴茎金属拭子(SCPMS)是性病检测的尿液替代品,但来自低收入国家的数据有限。方法:在2019年10月至2020年9月期间,在乌干达坎帕拉的政府卫生机构招募患有尿道排出综合征的参与者,提供尿液和SCPMS。回顾性分析沙眼衣原体(CT)、淋病奈瑟菌(NG)、生殖支原体(MG)和阴道毛滴虫(TV)的检测结果。配对SCPMS和尿液样本与不一致的STI结果进行实时PCR分析。结果:在250名参与者中,分别有66.8% (n=167)、22.8% (n=57)、12.8% (n=32)和2.4% (n=6)在SCPMS和尿液样本检测中呈NG、CT、MG和TV阳性。使用Aptima检测的尿液和SCPMS对所有性传播感染的总体一致性为98.7%(987/1000)。经PCR检测,尿液与SCPMS检测NG、CT、MG和TV的符合率分别为100%(250/250)、97.6%(244/250)、99.6%(249/250)和99.6%(249/250)。SCPMS与尿液比较差异无统计学意义(p=0.9996)。对于1例STI (n=164)或≥2例STI (n=39)的配对样本,一致性分别为100%(656/656)和97.2%(175/180)。性传播感染的数量与样本类型之间的一致性无相关性(p=0.8606)。结论:这项研究揭示了SCPMS和尿液在有症状的乌干达男性中检测性传播感染的高度一致性,即使存在多种并发性传播感染。SCPMS可能是尿液的合适替代品,易于收集、运输和处理样品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-collected penile-meatal swabs are suitable for the detection of STIs in Ugandan men with high rates of STI coinfections.

Background: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a global health challenge. Testing is not routinely performed in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), which bear a disproportionate burden of STIs. Self-collected penile-meatal swabs (SCPMS) are an alternative to urine for STI testing, but data from LMICs are limited.

Methods: Between October 2019 and September 2020, recruited participants with urethral discharge syndrome at government health facilities in Kampala, Uganda, provided urine and SCPMS. Samples were retrospectively analysed for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) using Aptima assays. Paired SCPMS and urine samples with discordant STI results were analysed using real-time PCR assays.

Results: Of the 250 participants, 66.8% (n=167), 22.8% (n=57), 12.8% (n=32) and 2.4% (n=6) tested positive for NG, CT, MG and TV, respectively, on testing of their SCPMS and urine samples. The overall agreement between urine and SCPMS for all STIs using the Aptima assays was 98.7% (987/1000). After adjudication with PCR assays, the agreement between urine and SCPMS for NG, CT, MG and TV was 100% (250/250), 97.6% (244/250), 99.6% (249/250), and 99.6% (249/250), respectively. There was no significant difference between SCPMS and urine (p=0.9996). For paired samples with one STI (n=164) or ≥2 STIs (n=39), concordance was 100% (656/656) and 97.2% (175/180), respectively. There was no association between number of STIs and agreement between sample types (p=0.8606).

Conclusions: This study revealed a high level of agreement between SCPMS and urine for detection of STIs in symptomatic Ugandan men, even in the presence of multiple concurrent STIs. SCPMS may be a suitable alternative to urine, with ease of collection, transporting, and processing of samples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Sexually Transmitted Infections 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
96
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexually Transmitted Infections is the world’s longest running international journal on sexual health. It aims to keep practitioners, trainees and researchers up to date in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of all STIs and HIV. The journal publishes original research, descriptive epidemiology, evidence-based reviews and comment on the clinical, public health, sociological and laboratory aspects of sexual health from around the world. We also publish educational articles, letters and other material of interest to readers, along with podcasts and other online material. STI provides a high quality editorial service from submission to publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信