Kristian R.L. Mortensen , Lina Holm Ingelsrud , Omar Muharemovic , Kirill Gromov , Anders Troelsen
{"title":"全膝关节置换术中内侧一致负重会影响固定吗?一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Kristian R.L. Mortensen , Lina Holm Ingelsrud , Omar Muharemovic , Kirill Gromov , Anders Troelsen","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2024.11.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Medially congruent (MC) bearings aim at promoting medial pivoting after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), as the congruency provides further constraint for the medial femoral compartment. However, this design difference could alter intra-articular force distribution, potentially compromising fixation of the tibia implant. The aim of this study was to compare migration, measured with radiostereometric analysis (RSA), of an MC to a more traditional cruciate retaining (CR) TKA system. Secondary aims were to compare patient-perceived treatment outcome and number of complications between the treatment groups.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixty patients undergoing TKA were randomized to an MC or CR bearing and had follow up visits after 3 months, 1 and 2 years. Primary outcome was tibia implant migration, measured by maximal total point motion (MTPM) with model-based RSA, 2 years post-surgery. Secondary outcomes were tibia MTPM, change in patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) and number of complications registered at all follow up visits.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Primary outcome was available for 52 patients (27 MC patients, 25 CR patients). We found no difference in tibia MTPM between the MC and CR groups 2 years post-surgery. Median (interquartile range) MTPM was 0.60 (0.39–0.97) mm and 0.48 (0.32–0.78) mm in the MC and CR group, respectively (<em>P</em> = 0.167). There were no between-group differences in improvement in PROMs and no between-group differences in number of complications.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We found no compromising of tibia implant fixation in TKA by choosing an MC bearing, when compared with a CR bearing. PROMs and complication rates suggest comparable treatment results with both types of bearings in TKA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"53 ","pages":"Pages 19-27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does a medial congruent bearing in total knee arthroplasty compromise fixation? A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Kristian R.L. Mortensen , Lina Holm Ingelsrud , Omar Muharemovic , Kirill Gromov , Anders Troelsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.knee.2024.11.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Medially congruent (MC) bearings aim at promoting medial pivoting after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), as the congruency provides further constraint for the medial femoral compartment. However, this design difference could alter intra-articular force distribution, potentially compromising fixation of the tibia implant. The aim of this study was to compare migration, measured with radiostereometric analysis (RSA), of an MC to a more traditional cruciate retaining (CR) TKA system. Secondary aims were to compare patient-perceived treatment outcome and number of complications between the treatment groups.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixty patients undergoing TKA were randomized to an MC or CR bearing and had follow up visits after 3 months, 1 and 2 years. Primary outcome was tibia implant migration, measured by maximal total point motion (MTPM) with model-based RSA, 2 years post-surgery. Secondary outcomes were tibia MTPM, change in patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) and number of complications registered at all follow up visits.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Primary outcome was available for 52 patients (27 MC patients, 25 CR patients). We found no difference in tibia MTPM between the MC and CR groups 2 years post-surgery. Median (interquartile range) MTPM was 0.60 (0.39–0.97) mm and 0.48 (0.32–0.78) mm in the MC and CR group, respectively (<em>P</em> = 0.167). There were no between-group differences in improvement in PROMs and no between-group differences in number of complications.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We found no compromising of tibia implant fixation in TKA by choosing an MC bearing, when compared with a CR bearing. PROMs and complication rates suggest comparable treatment results with both types of bearings in TKA.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee\",\"volume\":\"53 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 19-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024002345\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024002345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does a medial congruent bearing in total knee arthroplasty compromise fixation? A randomized controlled trial
Background
Medially congruent (MC) bearings aim at promoting medial pivoting after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), as the congruency provides further constraint for the medial femoral compartment. However, this design difference could alter intra-articular force distribution, potentially compromising fixation of the tibia implant. The aim of this study was to compare migration, measured with radiostereometric analysis (RSA), of an MC to a more traditional cruciate retaining (CR) TKA system. Secondary aims were to compare patient-perceived treatment outcome and number of complications between the treatment groups.
Methods
Sixty patients undergoing TKA were randomized to an MC or CR bearing and had follow up visits after 3 months, 1 and 2 years. Primary outcome was tibia implant migration, measured by maximal total point motion (MTPM) with model-based RSA, 2 years post-surgery. Secondary outcomes were tibia MTPM, change in patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) and number of complications registered at all follow up visits.
Results
Primary outcome was available for 52 patients (27 MC patients, 25 CR patients). We found no difference in tibia MTPM between the MC and CR groups 2 years post-surgery. Median (interquartile range) MTPM was 0.60 (0.39–0.97) mm and 0.48 (0.32–0.78) mm in the MC and CR group, respectively (P = 0.167). There were no between-group differences in improvement in PROMs and no between-group differences in number of complications.
Conclusion
We found no compromising of tibia implant fixation in TKA by choosing an MC bearing, when compared with a CR bearing. PROMs and complication rates suggest comparable treatment results with both types of bearings in TKA.
期刊介绍:
The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee.
The topics covered include, but are not limited to:
• Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry;
• Biomechanical studies;
• Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices;
• Imaging and diagnostic techniques;
• Pathology;
• Trauma;
• Surgery;
• Rehabilitation.