Jordan M Rook , Ami Hayashi , Daniela Salinas , Yasmine Abbey , Danielle Newton , Daniel Carrera , Jesus G. Ulloa , Rochelle A. Dicker , Vickie M. Mays , Catherine J. Juillard
{"title":"急诊评估和治疗创伤患者使用化学和物理约束的最新趋势和危险因素。","authors":"Jordan M Rook , Ami Hayashi , Daniela Salinas , Yasmine Abbey , Danielle Newton , Daniel Carrera , Jesus G. Ulloa , Rochelle A. Dicker , Vickie M. Mays , Catherine J. Juillard","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.112066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite research linking chemical and physical restraints to negative outcomes including unplanned intubations and psychological distress, there is little guidance for their use in the care of trauma patients. We used institutional data to describe recent trends in chemical and physical restraint in the emergency department evaluation and treatment of trauma patients and to identify characteristics associated with their use.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study includes adult trauma activations at a United States urban level I trauma center from January 2016 to July 2022. Data were collected from the trauma registry and medical record. We assessed the use of chemical restraints and physical restraints during care provided in the trauma resuscitation bay and emergency department. We assessed trends over time graphically and with logistic regression. We used multivariable regression models to evaluate associations between restraint use and patient and clinical characteristics and the outcomes of ICU admission, hospitalization duration, and mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 8,112 patients, most were male (74.8 %), White (55.8 %), and privately insured (35.2 %). Overall, 8.1 % were restrained with 7.1 % chemically restrained and 2.7 % physically restrained. Overall restraint use increased 254 % (<em>p</em> < 0.001) from 2016 to 2022 driven primarily by a 460 % (<em>p</em> < 0.001) increase in chemical restraint use including a 630 % increase in ketamine administrations (<em>p</em> < 0.001).</div><div>Use of restraints was associated with pre-existing psychotic disorders, intoxication, altered mental status, increasing injury severity, and Medicaid insurance (<em>p</em> < 0.001). Chemical restraint administration was associated with a 3.5 percentage point (95 %CI 1.1–5.9; <em>p</em> = 0.004) increase in the probability of ICU admission and a 1.0 day (95 %CI 0.6–1.4; <em>p</em> < 0.001) increase in hospitalization duration.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this institutional study, nearly one-in-twelve trauma patients were restrained during emergency department evaluation and treatment. Restraint utilization increased during the study driven primarily by increases in ketamine and restraints utilized during trauma bay evaluation and resuscitation. Future research should assess the generalizability of these findings. It is important that rigorous guidelines are established to ensure the safe and effective use of restraints in trauma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 1","pages":"Article 112066"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent trends and risk factors for chemical and physical restraint use in the emergency department evaluation and treatment of trauma patients\",\"authors\":\"Jordan M Rook , Ami Hayashi , Daniela Salinas , Yasmine Abbey , Danielle Newton , Daniel Carrera , Jesus G. Ulloa , Rochelle A. Dicker , Vickie M. Mays , Catherine J. Juillard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.injury.2024.112066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite research linking chemical and physical restraints to negative outcomes including unplanned intubations and psychological distress, there is little guidance for their use in the care of trauma patients. We used institutional data to describe recent trends in chemical and physical restraint in the emergency department evaluation and treatment of trauma patients and to identify characteristics associated with their use.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study includes adult trauma activations at a United States urban level I trauma center from January 2016 to July 2022. Data were collected from the trauma registry and medical record. We assessed the use of chemical restraints and physical restraints during care provided in the trauma resuscitation bay and emergency department. We assessed trends over time graphically and with logistic regression. We used multivariable regression models to evaluate associations between restraint use and patient and clinical characteristics and the outcomes of ICU admission, hospitalization duration, and mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 8,112 patients, most were male (74.8 %), White (55.8 %), and privately insured (35.2 %). Overall, 8.1 % were restrained with 7.1 % chemically restrained and 2.7 % physically restrained. Overall restraint use increased 254 % (<em>p</em> < 0.001) from 2016 to 2022 driven primarily by a 460 % (<em>p</em> < 0.001) increase in chemical restraint use including a 630 % increase in ketamine administrations (<em>p</em> < 0.001).</div><div>Use of restraints was associated with pre-existing psychotic disorders, intoxication, altered mental status, increasing injury severity, and Medicaid insurance (<em>p</em> < 0.001). Chemical restraint administration was associated with a 3.5 percentage point (95 %CI 1.1–5.9; <em>p</em> = 0.004) increase in the probability of ICU admission and a 1.0 day (95 %CI 0.6–1.4; <em>p</em> < 0.001) increase in hospitalization duration.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this institutional study, nearly one-in-twelve trauma patients were restrained during emergency department evaluation and treatment. Restraint utilization increased during the study driven primarily by increases in ketamine and restraints utilized during trauma bay evaluation and resuscitation. Future research should assess the generalizability of these findings. It is important that rigorous guidelines are established to ensure the safe and effective use of restraints in trauma.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 112066\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138324008106\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138324008106","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:尽管有研究将化学和物理约束与包括计划外插管和心理困扰在内的负面结果联系起来,但在创伤患者的护理中使用化学和物理约束的指导很少。我们使用机构数据来描述急诊科评估和治疗创伤患者时化学和物理约束的最新趋势,并确定其使用相关的特征。方法:本研究包括2016年1月至2022年7月在美国城市一级创伤中心进行的成人创伤激活。数据收集自创伤登记和医疗记录。我们评估了创伤复苏室和急诊科在护理过程中使用化学约束和物理约束的情况。我们用图形和逻辑回归评估了随时间变化的趋势。我们使用多变量回归模型来评估约束使用与患者和临床特征、ICU入院结局、住院时间和死亡率之间的关系。结果:8112例患者中,男性占74.8%,白人占55.8%,私人保险占35.2%。总的来说,8.1%的人受到了约束,其中7.1%受到了化学约束,2.7%受到了物理约束。从2016年到2022年,总体约束使用量增加了254% (p < 0.001),主要原因是化学约束使用量增加了460% (p < 0.001),其中氯胺酮使用量增加了630% (p < 0.001)。使用约束与先前存在的精神障碍、中毒、精神状态改变、伤害严重程度增加和医疗补助保险相关(p < 0.001)。化学约束管理与3.5个百分点相关(95% CI 1.1-5.9;p = 0.004)入院ICU的概率增加1天(95% CI 0.6-1.4;P < 0.001)住院时间增加。结论:在本机构研究中,近十二分之一的创伤患者在急诊评估和治疗期间受到约束。在研究期间,约束的使用增加主要是由于在创伤室评估和复苏期间氯胺酮和约束的使用增加。未来的研究应评估这些发现的普遍性。制定严格的指导方针以确保在创伤中安全有效地使用约束是很重要的。
Recent trends and risk factors for chemical and physical restraint use in the emergency department evaluation and treatment of trauma patients
Background
Despite research linking chemical and physical restraints to negative outcomes including unplanned intubations and psychological distress, there is little guidance for their use in the care of trauma patients. We used institutional data to describe recent trends in chemical and physical restraint in the emergency department evaluation and treatment of trauma patients and to identify characteristics associated with their use.
Methods
This study includes adult trauma activations at a United States urban level I trauma center from January 2016 to July 2022. Data were collected from the trauma registry and medical record. We assessed the use of chemical restraints and physical restraints during care provided in the trauma resuscitation bay and emergency department. We assessed trends over time graphically and with logistic regression. We used multivariable regression models to evaluate associations between restraint use and patient and clinical characteristics and the outcomes of ICU admission, hospitalization duration, and mortality.
Results
Of the 8,112 patients, most were male (74.8 %), White (55.8 %), and privately insured (35.2 %). Overall, 8.1 % were restrained with 7.1 % chemically restrained and 2.7 % physically restrained. Overall restraint use increased 254 % (p < 0.001) from 2016 to 2022 driven primarily by a 460 % (p < 0.001) increase in chemical restraint use including a 630 % increase in ketamine administrations (p < 0.001).
Use of restraints was associated with pre-existing psychotic disorders, intoxication, altered mental status, increasing injury severity, and Medicaid insurance (p < 0.001). Chemical restraint administration was associated with a 3.5 percentage point (95 %CI 1.1–5.9; p = 0.004) increase in the probability of ICU admission and a 1.0 day (95 %CI 0.6–1.4; p < 0.001) increase in hospitalization duration.
Conclusions
In this institutional study, nearly one-in-twelve trauma patients were restrained during emergency department evaluation and treatment. Restraint utilization increased during the study driven primarily by increases in ketamine and restraints utilized during trauma bay evaluation and resuscitation. Future research should assess the generalizability of these findings. It is important that rigorous guidelines are established to ensure the safe and effective use of restraints in trauma.
期刊介绍:
Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.