radhawk——基于人工智能的知识推荐,支持精准教育,提高报告效率,减少认知负荷。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-07 DOI:10.1007/s00247-024-06116-y
Julian Lopez-Rippe, Manasa Reddy, Maria Camila Velez-Florez, Raisa Amiruddin, Wondwossen Lerebo, Ami Gokli, Michael Francavilla, Janet Reid
{"title":"radhawk——基于人工智能的知识推荐,支持精准教育,提高报告效率,减少认知负荷。","authors":"Julian Lopez-Rippe, Manasa Reddy, Maria Camila Velez-Florez, Raisa Amiruddin, Wondwossen Lerebo, Ami Gokli, Michael Francavilla, Janet Reid","doi":"10.1007/s00247-024-06116-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Using artificial intelligence (AI) to augment knowledge is key to establishing precision education in modern radiology training. Our department has developed a novel AI-derived knowledge recommender, the first reported precision education program in radiology, RADHawk (RH), that augments the training of radiology residents and fellows by pushing personalized and relevant educational content in real-time and in context with the case being interpreted.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the impact on trainees of an AI-based knowledge recommender compared to traditional knowledge sourcing for radiology reporting through reporting time, quality, cognitive load, and learning experiences.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A mixed methods prospective study allocated trainees to intervention and control groups, working with and without access to RH, respectively. Validated questionnaires and observed and graded simulated picture archiving and communication system (PACS)-based reporting at the start and end of a month's rotation assessed technology acceptance, case report quality, case report time and sourcing time, cognitive load, and attitudes toward modified learning strategies. Non-parametric regression analyses and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare outcomes between groups, with significance set at P<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention group (n=28) demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the case report time by -162 s per case (95%CI -275.76 s to -52.40 s) (P-value = 0.002) and an increase of 14% (95%CI 8.1-19.8%) (P-value <0.001) in accuracy scores compared to the control group (n=29) at the end of the rotation. The intervention group also showed lower levels of mental demand (P=0.030) and experienced less effort (P=0.030) and frustration (P=0.030) while reporting. Additionally, >78% of the intervention group gave positive ratings on RH's effectiveness, increase in productivity, job usefulness, and ease of use. Eighty-nine percent of participants in the intervention group requested access to RH for their next rotation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that RH, as the first reported AI-derived knowledge recommender for radiology education, significantly reduces reporting time and improves reporting accuracy while reducing overall workload and mental demand for radiology trainees. The high acceptance among trainees suggests its potential for supporting self-directed learning. Further testing of a larger external cohort will support more widespread implementation of RH for precision education.</p>","PeriodicalId":19755,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"259-267"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RADHawk-an AI-based knowledge recommender to support precision education, improve reporting productivity, and reduce cognitive load.\",\"authors\":\"Julian Lopez-Rippe, Manasa Reddy, Maria Camila Velez-Florez, Raisa Amiruddin, Wondwossen Lerebo, Ami Gokli, Michael Francavilla, Janet Reid\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00247-024-06116-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Using artificial intelligence (AI) to augment knowledge is key to establishing precision education in modern radiology training. Our department has developed a novel AI-derived knowledge recommender, the first reported precision education program in radiology, RADHawk (RH), that augments the training of radiology residents and fellows by pushing personalized and relevant educational content in real-time and in context with the case being interpreted.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the impact on trainees of an AI-based knowledge recommender compared to traditional knowledge sourcing for radiology reporting through reporting time, quality, cognitive load, and learning experiences.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A mixed methods prospective study allocated trainees to intervention and control groups, working with and without access to RH, respectively. Validated questionnaires and observed and graded simulated picture archiving and communication system (PACS)-based reporting at the start and end of a month's rotation assessed technology acceptance, case report quality, case report time and sourcing time, cognitive load, and attitudes toward modified learning strategies. Non-parametric regression analyses and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare outcomes between groups, with significance set at P<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention group (n=28) demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the case report time by -162 s per case (95%CI -275.76 s to -52.40 s) (P-value = 0.002) and an increase of 14% (95%CI 8.1-19.8%) (P-value <0.001) in accuracy scores compared to the control group (n=29) at the end of the rotation. The intervention group also showed lower levels of mental demand (P=0.030) and experienced less effort (P=0.030) and frustration (P=0.030) while reporting. Additionally, >78% of the intervention group gave positive ratings on RH's effectiveness, increase in productivity, job usefulness, and ease of use. Eighty-nine percent of participants in the intervention group requested access to RH for their next rotation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that RH, as the first reported AI-derived knowledge recommender for radiology education, significantly reduces reporting time and improves reporting accuracy while reducing overall workload and mental demand for radiology trainees. The high acceptance among trainees suggests its potential for supporting self-directed learning. Further testing of a larger external cohort will support more widespread implementation of RH for precision education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"259-267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-06116-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-06116-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在现代放射学培训中,利用人工智能(AI)增强知识是建立精准教育的关键。我们部门开发了一种新型的人工智能知识推荐系统,这是第一个报道的放射学精确教育项目,RADHawk (RH),通过实时推送个性化和相关的教育内容,并结合病例进行解释,增强了放射学住院医师和研究员的培训。目的:通过报告时间、质量、认知负荷和学习经验,评估基于人工智能的知识推荐者与传统的放射学报告知识来源相比对受训者的影响。材料和方法:一项混合方法前瞻性研究将受训者分配到干预组和对照组,分别使用和不使用RH。在一个月的轮换开始和结束时,通过验证问卷,观察和评分模拟图片存档和通信系统(PACS)为基础的报告,评估技术接受程度、病例报告质量、病例报告时间和采购时间、认知负荷和对改进学习策略的态度。采用非参数回归分析和Mann-Whitney检验比较两组间的结果,显著性设置为results:干预组(n=28)显示病例报告时间每例减少-162 s (95%CI -275.76 s至-52.40 s) (p值= 0.002),增加14% (95%CI 8.1-19.8%) (p值78%的干预组对RH的有效性、提高生产率、工作有用性和易用性给予积极评价。干预组中89%的参与者要求在下一轮轮换时获得RH。结论:本研究表明,RH作为首个报道的人工智能衍生的放射学教育知识推荐,显著缩短了报告时间,提高了报告准确性,同时减少了放射学学员的总体工作量和精神需求。学员的高接受度表明其支持自主学习的潜力。对更大的外部队列的进一步测试将支持更广泛地实施RH进行精确教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RADHawk-an AI-based knowledge recommender to support precision education, improve reporting productivity, and reduce cognitive load.

Background: Using artificial intelligence (AI) to augment knowledge is key to establishing precision education in modern radiology training. Our department has developed a novel AI-derived knowledge recommender, the first reported precision education program in radiology, RADHawk (RH), that augments the training of radiology residents and fellows by pushing personalized and relevant educational content in real-time and in context with the case being interpreted.

Purpose: To assess the impact on trainees of an AI-based knowledge recommender compared to traditional knowledge sourcing for radiology reporting through reporting time, quality, cognitive load, and learning experiences.

Materials and methods: A mixed methods prospective study allocated trainees to intervention and control groups, working with and without access to RH, respectively. Validated questionnaires and observed and graded simulated picture archiving and communication system (PACS)-based reporting at the start and end of a month's rotation assessed technology acceptance, case report quality, case report time and sourcing time, cognitive load, and attitudes toward modified learning strategies. Non-parametric regression analyses and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare outcomes between groups, with significance set at P<0.05.

Results: The intervention group (n=28) demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the case report time by -162 s per case (95%CI -275.76 s to -52.40 s) (P-value = 0.002) and an increase of 14% (95%CI 8.1-19.8%) (P-value <0.001) in accuracy scores compared to the control group (n=29) at the end of the rotation. The intervention group also showed lower levels of mental demand (P=0.030) and experienced less effort (P=0.030) and frustration (P=0.030) while reporting. Additionally, >78% of the intervention group gave positive ratings on RH's effectiveness, increase in productivity, job usefulness, and ease of use. Eighty-nine percent of participants in the intervention group requested access to RH for their next rotation.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that RH, as the first reported AI-derived knowledge recommender for radiology education, significantly reduces reporting time and improves reporting accuracy while reducing overall workload and mental demand for radiology trainees. The high acceptance among trainees suggests its potential for supporting self-directed learning. Further testing of a larger external cohort will support more widespread implementation of RH for precision education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Radiology
Pediatric Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Asian and Oceanic Society for Pediatric Radiology Pediatric Radiology informs its readers of new findings and progress in all areas of pediatric imaging and in related fields. This is achieved by a blend of original papers, complemented by reviews that set out the present state of knowledge in a particular area of the specialty or summarize specific topics in which discussion has led to clear conclusions. Advances in technology, methodology, apparatus and auxiliary equipment are presented, and modifications of standard techniques are described. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信