儿童踝关节扭伤的非约束:一项非劣效性随机临床试验。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Sara Suarez-Cabezas, Begoña Perez-Moneo, Maria Cabrerizo Ortiz, Monica Hortigüela Aparicio, Carmen Gómez Gérez, Elisa M Molanes-López, Ricardo Larrainzar-Garijo, Paula Vazquez Lopez
{"title":"儿童踝关节扭伤的非约束:一项非劣效性随机临床试验。","authors":"Sara Suarez-Cabezas, Begoña Perez-Moneo, Maria Cabrerizo Ortiz, Monica Hortigüela Aparicio, Carmen Gómez Gérez, Elisa M Molanes-López, Ricardo Larrainzar-Garijo, Paula Vazquez Lopez","doi":"10.1007/s00431-024-05904-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ankle sprains are common injuries in pediatric populations, yet current literature lacks consensus on optimal management strategies. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of non-restraint treatment versus bandaging in children with mild ankle sprains, focusing on functional recovery and pain management.A single-center, open-label, non-inferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted at a pediatric emergency service. Patients aged 5-16 years with mild ankle sprains were included. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a standardized functional bandage or only general measures with non-restraint. The primary endpoints were a 10-point difference in the OXAFQ-C and a 2-point difference in pain intensity at day 5 after discharge. A total of 113 participants were randomly assigned to receive a functional bandage (n = 51) or non-restraint measures (n = 62). At day 5, the OXAFQ-C score in the non-restraint group was 76.59 (SD 15.51) and 69.71 (SD 15.24) in the restraint group, with a mean difference of 6.295 (90% CI - 0.058 to 12.647). The mean difference in pain intensity was 0.048 (90% CI - 0.741 to 0.838). No differences were observed in the OXAFQ-C scores or pain intensity at 14 and 30 days. Conclusions: This single-center, randomized clinical trial demonstrates that non-restraint is non-inferior to bandaging for functional recovery and short- to medium-term pain management in pediatric patients with mild ankle sprains. The treatment was very well accepted among patients and no adverse effects were reported.Trial registration: Retrospectively registered in January 2024 on clinicaltrials.org with identifier: NCT06189625. What is Known • Current literature lacks consensus on optimal ankle sprain management, with no evidence supporting non-restraint approaches. Guidelines recommend immobilization despite insufficient comparative data on different restraint systems. Some studies seem to demonstrate that early mobilization may offer better outcomes. What is New • This study contributes novel evidence by demonstrating the non-inferiority of non-restraint treatment compared to bandaging in pediatric ankle sprains. It highlights the safety and efficacy of early mobilization without restraint, suggesting a potential shift in standard management practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"184 1","pages":"70"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11625057/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-restraint in pediatric ankle sprain: a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Suarez-Cabezas, Begoña Perez-Moneo, Maria Cabrerizo Ortiz, Monica Hortigüela Aparicio, Carmen Gómez Gérez, Elisa M Molanes-López, Ricardo Larrainzar-Garijo, Paula Vazquez Lopez\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00431-024-05904-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ankle sprains are common injuries in pediatric populations, yet current literature lacks consensus on optimal management strategies. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of non-restraint treatment versus bandaging in children with mild ankle sprains, focusing on functional recovery and pain management.A single-center, open-label, non-inferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted at a pediatric emergency service. Patients aged 5-16 years with mild ankle sprains were included. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a standardized functional bandage or only general measures with non-restraint. The primary endpoints were a 10-point difference in the OXAFQ-C and a 2-point difference in pain intensity at day 5 after discharge. A total of 113 participants were randomly assigned to receive a functional bandage (n = 51) or non-restraint measures (n = 62). At day 5, the OXAFQ-C score in the non-restraint group was 76.59 (SD 15.51) and 69.71 (SD 15.24) in the restraint group, with a mean difference of 6.295 (90% CI - 0.058 to 12.647). The mean difference in pain intensity was 0.048 (90% CI - 0.741 to 0.838). No differences were observed in the OXAFQ-C scores or pain intensity at 14 and 30 days. Conclusions: This single-center, randomized clinical trial demonstrates that non-restraint is non-inferior to bandaging for functional recovery and short- to medium-term pain management in pediatric patients with mild ankle sprains. The treatment was very well accepted among patients and no adverse effects were reported.Trial registration: Retrospectively registered in January 2024 on clinicaltrials.org with identifier: NCT06189625. What is Known • Current literature lacks consensus on optimal ankle sprain management, with no evidence supporting non-restraint approaches. Guidelines recommend immobilization despite insufficient comparative data on different restraint systems. Some studies seem to demonstrate that early mobilization may offer better outcomes. What is New • This study contributes novel evidence by demonstrating the non-inferiority of non-restraint treatment compared to bandaging in pediatric ankle sprains. It highlights the safety and efficacy of early mobilization without restraint, suggesting a potential shift in standard management practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"184 1\",\"pages\":\"70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11625057/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-024-05904-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-024-05904-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

踝关节扭伤是儿科人群中常见的损伤,但目前的文献缺乏对最佳管理策略的共识。本研究旨在比较无约束治疗与绑扎治疗对轻度踝关节扭伤儿童的疗效,重点关注功能恢复和疼痛管理。在儿科急诊中心进行了一项单中心、开放标签、非劣效性随机临床试验。患者年龄5-16岁,伴有轻度踝关节扭伤。参与者按1:1的比例随机分配,接受标准化的功能性绷带或仅采用无约束的一般措施。主要终点为出院后第5天OXAFQ-C评分差10分,疼痛强度差2分。共有113名参与者被随机分配接受功能性绷带(n = 51)或非约束措施(n = 62)。第5天,非约束组的OXAFQ-C评分为76.59 (SD 15.51),约束组的OXAFQ-C评分为69.71 (SD 15.24),平均差异为6.295 (90% CI - 0.058 ~ 12.647)。疼痛强度的平均差异为0.048 (90% CI - 0.741 ~ 0.838)。第14天和第30天的OXAFQ-C评分和疼痛强度均无差异。结论:这项单中心随机临床试验表明,对于轻度踝关节扭伤的儿童患者,在功能恢复和中短期疼痛管理方面,非约束不逊于绑扎。治疗在患者中得到很好的接受,没有不良反应的报道。试验注册:于2024年1月在clinicaltrials.org上回顾性注册,标识符:NCT06189625。•目前的文献缺乏关于最佳踝关节扭伤管理的共识,没有证据支持非约束方法。尽管缺乏不同约束系统的比较数据,但指南建议进行固定。一些研究似乎表明,早期动员可能会带来更好的结果。•本研究提供了新的证据,证明了与绑扎治疗相比,无拘束治疗在儿童踝关节扭伤中的非劣效性。它强调了不受限制的早期动员的安全性和有效性,表明标准管理实践的潜在转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-restraint in pediatric ankle sprain: a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial.

Ankle sprains are common injuries in pediatric populations, yet current literature lacks consensus on optimal management strategies. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of non-restraint treatment versus bandaging in children with mild ankle sprains, focusing on functional recovery and pain management.A single-center, open-label, non-inferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted at a pediatric emergency service. Patients aged 5-16 years with mild ankle sprains were included. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a standardized functional bandage or only general measures with non-restraint. The primary endpoints were a 10-point difference in the OXAFQ-C and a 2-point difference in pain intensity at day 5 after discharge. A total of 113 participants were randomly assigned to receive a functional bandage (n = 51) or non-restraint measures (n = 62). At day 5, the OXAFQ-C score in the non-restraint group was 76.59 (SD 15.51) and 69.71 (SD 15.24) in the restraint group, with a mean difference of 6.295 (90% CI - 0.058 to 12.647). The mean difference in pain intensity was 0.048 (90% CI - 0.741 to 0.838). No differences were observed in the OXAFQ-C scores or pain intensity at 14 and 30 days. Conclusions: This single-center, randomized clinical trial demonstrates that non-restraint is non-inferior to bandaging for functional recovery and short- to medium-term pain management in pediatric patients with mild ankle sprains. The treatment was very well accepted among patients and no adverse effects were reported.Trial registration: Retrospectively registered in January 2024 on clinicaltrials.org with identifier: NCT06189625. What is Known • Current literature lacks consensus on optimal ankle sprain management, with no evidence supporting non-restraint approaches. Guidelines recommend immobilization despite insufficient comparative data on different restraint systems. Some studies seem to demonstrate that early mobilization may offer better outcomes. What is New • This study contributes novel evidence by demonstrating the non-inferiority of non-restraint treatment compared to bandaging in pediatric ankle sprains. It highlights the safety and efficacy of early mobilization without restraint, suggesting a potential shift in standard management practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics. EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned. The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics. EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate. EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信