导航对象定位记忆评估在真实和虚拟环境:系统回顾。

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Behavioural Brain Research Pub Date : 2025-03-05 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115388
Tania Llana, Marta Mendez, M-Carmen Juan, Magdalena Mendez-Lopez
{"title":"导航对象定位记忆评估在真实和虚拟环境:系统回顾。","authors":"Tania Llana, Marta Mendez, M-Carmen Juan, Magdalena Mendez-Lopez","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Navigational object-location memory (OLM) is a form of spatial memory involving actual or virtual body displacement for repositioning previously encoded objects within an environment. Despite its potential for higher ecological validity measures, navigational OLM has been less frequently assessed than static OLM. The present systematic review aims to characterize the methodology and devices used for OLM assessment in navigational real and virtual environments and synthesize recent literature to offer a comprehensive overview of OLM performance in both pathological and non-pathological adult samples. A search through four different databases was conducted, identifying 39 studies. Most studies assessed navigational OLM in healthy adults by 2-dimensional or 3-dimensional computerized tasks, although immersive Virtual Reality (VR) devices were also frequently employed. Small environments and objects with high-semantic value were predominantly used, with assessment mainly conducted immediately after learning through free-recall tasks. The findings revealed that healthy samples outperformed clinical ones in navigational OLM. Men showed superior performance compared to women when cues or landmarks were used, but this advantage disappeared in their absence. Better results were also noted with shorter intervals between learning and recall. Fewer OLM errors occurred in real environments compared to both immersive and non-immersive VR. Influences of environmental features, object semantics, and participant characteristics on OLM performance were also observed. These results highlight the need for standardized methodologies, the inclusion of a broader age range in populations, and careful control over the devices, environments, and objects used in navigational OLM assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":" ","pages":"115388"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigational object-location memory assessment in real and virtual environments: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Tania Llana, Marta Mendez, M-Carmen Juan, Magdalena Mendez-Lopez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Navigational object-location memory (OLM) is a form of spatial memory involving actual or virtual body displacement for repositioning previously encoded objects within an environment. Despite its potential for higher ecological validity measures, navigational OLM has been less frequently assessed than static OLM. The present systematic review aims to characterize the methodology and devices used for OLM assessment in navigational real and virtual environments and synthesize recent literature to offer a comprehensive overview of OLM performance in both pathological and non-pathological adult samples. A search through four different databases was conducted, identifying 39 studies. Most studies assessed navigational OLM in healthy adults by 2-dimensional or 3-dimensional computerized tasks, although immersive Virtual Reality (VR) devices were also frequently employed. Small environments and objects with high-semantic value were predominantly used, with assessment mainly conducted immediately after learning through free-recall tasks. The findings revealed that healthy samples outperformed clinical ones in navigational OLM. Men showed superior performance compared to women when cues or landmarks were used, but this advantage disappeared in their absence. Better results were also noted with shorter intervals between learning and recall. Fewer OLM errors occurred in real environments compared to both immersive and non-immersive VR. Influences of environmental features, object semantics, and participant characteristics on OLM performance were also observed. These results highlight the need for standardized methodologies, the inclusion of a broader age range in populations, and careful control over the devices, environments, and objects used in navigational OLM assessments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioural Brain Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"115388\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioural Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115388\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115388","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导航对象定位记忆(OLM)是一种空间记忆形式,涉及实际或虚拟的身体位移,用于在环境中重新定位先前编码的对象。尽管具有更高生态有效性的潜力,但与静态OLM相比,导航OLM的评估频率较低。本系统综述旨在描述导航真实和虚拟环境中用于OLM评估的方法和设备,并综合最近的文献,以提供病理和非病理成人样本中OLM性能的全面概述。通过四个不同的数据库进行了搜索,确定了39项研究。大多数研究通过二维或三维计算机化任务评估健康成人的导航性OLM,尽管沉浸式虚拟现实(VR)设备也经常使用。主要使用语义价值高的小环境和物体,评估主要通过自由回忆任务在学习后立即进行。研究结果表明,健康样本在导航OLM中的表现优于临床样本。当使用线索或地标时,男性的表现优于女性,但在没有线索或地标时,这种优势就消失了。学习和回忆之间的间隔越短,结果也越好。与沉浸式和非沉浸式VR相比,真实环境中发生的OLM错误更少。环境特征、对象语义和参与者特征对OLM绩效的影响也被观察到。这些结果强调需要标准化的方法,在人群中纳入更广泛的年龄范围,并仔细控制导航OLM评估中使用的设备、环境和对象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigational object-location memory assessment in real and virtual environments: A systematic review.

Navigational object-location memory (OLM) is a form of spatial memory involving actual or virtual body displacement for repositioning previously encoded objects within an environment. Despite its potential for higher ecological validity measures, navigational OLM has been less frequently assessed than static OLM. The present systematic review aims to characterize the methodology and devices used for OLM assessment in navigational real and virtual environments and synthesize recent literature to offer a comprehensive overview of OLM performance in both pathological and non-pathological adult samples. A search through four different databases was conducted, identifying 39 studies. Most studies assessed navigational OLM in healthy adults by 2-dimensional or 3-dimensional computerized tasks, although immersive Virtual Reality (VR) devices were also frequently employed. Small environments and objects with high-semantic value were predominantly used, with assessment mainly conducted immediately after learning through free-recall tasks. The findings revealed that healthy samples outperformed clinical ones in navigational OLM. Men showed superior performance compared to women when cues or landmarks were used, but this advantage disappeared in their absence. Better results were also noted with shorter intervals between learning and recall. Fewer OLM errors occurred in real environments compared to both immersive and non-immersive VR. Influences of environmental features, object semantics, and participant characteristics on OLM performance were also observed. These results highlight the need for standardized methodologies, the inclusion of a broader age range in populations, and careful control over the devices, environments, and objects used in navigational OLM assessments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Brain Research
Behavioural Brain Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
383
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信