评估死亡对离散选择实验效用的直接影响。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Hossein Ameri, Thomas G. Poder
{"title":"评估死亡对离散选择实验效用的直接影响。","authors":"Hossein Ameri,&nbsp;Thomas G. Poder","doi":"10.1007/s40258-024-00929-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The dead state can affect the value sets derived from discrete choice experiments (DCEs). Our aim was to empirically assess the direct impact of the immediate death state on health utilities using discrete choice experiment with time (DCE<sub>TTO</sub>).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A sample of the general population in Quebec, Canada, completed two approaches: DCE<sub>TTO</sub> followed by a best-worst scaling with time (BWS<sub>TTO</sub>) (hereafter referred to as DCE<sub>BWS</sub>), versus DCE<sub>TTO</sub> followed by the dominated option and the immediate death state (hereafter referred to as DCE<sub>DOD</sub>), both designed with the SF-6Dv2. In DCE<sub>BWS</sub>, all participants first completed 10 DCE<sub>TTO</sub> choices (i.e., option A vs B), followed by 3 BWS<sub>TTO</sub>. In DCE<sub>DOD</sub>, the same participants first completed the same 10 DCE<sub>TTO</sub> choices, followed by a repeated choice between the dominated option (i.e., A or B) and the immediate death state. A conditional logit model was used to estimate value sets. The performance of models was assessed using goodness of fit using Bayesian information criterion, parameters’ logical consistency, and levels’ significance. The direct impact of the death state on DCE latent utilities was evaluated by examining the magnitude of coefficients, assessing the agreement among the value sets estimated by DCE<sub>TTO</sub> with DCE<sub>BWS</sub> and with DCE<sub>DOD</sub> using Bland-Altman plots, the proportion of worst-than-dead (WTD) health states, and analyzing the range of estimated values.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>From 398 participants, a total of 348 participants were included for final analysis. The number of parameters with illogical consistency and non-significant coefficients was lower in DCE<sub>BWS</sub>. The observed consistency in the relative importance of dimensions across all approaches suggests a stable and reliable ranking. The utility range for DCE<sub>DOD</sub> (− 0.921 to 1) was narrower than for DCE<sub>TTO</sub> (− 1.578 to 1) and DCE<sub>BWS</sub> (− 1.150 to 1). The DCE<sub>DOD</sub> estimated a lower percentage of WTD health states (20.01 %) compared to DCE<sub>TTO</sub> (47.19 %) and DCE<sub>BWS</sub> (33.73 %). The agreement between DCE<sub>TTO</sub> and DCE<sub>BWS</sub> was slightly stronger than between DCE<sub>TTO</sub> and DCE<sub>DOD</sub>, and the mean utility values were higher in DCE<sub>DOD</sub> than in DCE<sub>BWS</sub>.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The inclusion of the immediate death state directly within DCE increased utility values. This increase was higher when the immediate death was included in a sequence within a DCE<sub>TTO</sub> (i.e., DCE<sub>DOD</sub>) than when it was included in a continuum of DCE<sub>TTO</sub> (i.e., DCE<sub>BWS</sub>). The use of DCE<sub>DOD</sub> was potentially better suited to incorporate the dead state into a DCE.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":"23 2","pages":"319 - 327"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Direct Impact of Death on Discrete Choice Experiment Utilities\",\"authors\":\"Hossein Ameri,&nbsp;Thomas G. Poder\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40258-024-00929-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The dead state can affect the value sets derived from discrete choice experiments (DCEs). Our aim was to empirically assess the direct impact of the immediate death state on health utilities using discrete choice experiment with time (DCE<sub>TTO</sub>).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A sample of the general population in Quebec, Canada, completed two approaches: DCE<sub>TTO</sub> followed by a best-worst scaling with time (BWS<sub>TTO</sub>) (hereafter referred to as DCE<sub>BWS</sub>), versus DCE<sub>TTO</sub> followed by the dominated option and the immediate death state (hereafter referred to as DCE<sub>DOD</sub>), both designed with the SF-6Dv2. In DCE<sub>BWS</sub>, all participants first completed 10 DCE<sub>TTO</sub> choices (i.e., option A vs B), followed by 3 BWS<sub>TTO</sub>. In DCE<sub>DOD</sub>, the same participants first completed the same 10 DCE<sub>TTO</sub> choices, followed by a repeated choice between the dominated option (i.e., A or B) and the immediate death state. A conditional logit model was used to estimate value sets. The performance of models was assessed using goodness of fit using Bayesian information criterion, parameters’ logical consistency, and levels’ significance. The direct impact of the death state on DCE latent utilities was evaluated by examining the magnitude of coefficients, assessing the agreement among the value sets estimated by DCE<sub>TTO</sub> with DCE<sub>BWS</sub> and with DCE<sub>DOD</sub> using Bland-Altman plots, the proportion of worst-than-dead (WTD) health states, and analyzing the range of estimated values.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>From 398 participants, a total of 348 participants were included for final analysis. The number of parameters with illogical consistency and non-significant coefficients was lower in DCE<sub>BWS</sub>. The observed consistency in the relative importance of dimensions across all approaches suggests a stable and reliable ranking. The utility range for DCE<sub>DOD</sub> (− 0.921 to 1) was narrower than for DCE<sub>TTO</sub> (− 1.578 to 1) and DCE<sub>BWS</sub> (− 1.150 to 1). The DCE<sub>DOD</sub> estimated a lower percentage of WTD health states (20.01 %) compared to DCE<sub>TTO</sub> (47.19 %) and DCE<sub>BWS</sub> (33.73 %). The agreement between DCE<sub>TTO</sub> and DCE<sub>BWS</sub> was slightly stronger than between DCE<sub>TTO</sub> and DCE<sub>DOD</sub>, and the mean utility values were higher in DCE<sub>DOD</sub> than in DCE<sub>BWS</sub>.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The inclusion of the immediate death state directly within DCE increased utility values. This increase was higher when the immediate death was included in a sequence within a DCE<sub>TTO</sub> (i.e., DCE<sub>DOD</sub>) than when it was included in a continuum of DCE<sub>TTO</sub> (i.e., DCE<sub>BWS</sub>). The use of DCE<sub>DOD</sub> was potentially better suited to incorporate the dead state into a DCE.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"319 - 327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40258-024-00929-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40258-024-00929-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:死态会影响离散选择实验(dce)的值集。我们的目的是利用时间离散选择实验(DCETTO)实证评估即时死亡状态对医疗效用的直接影响。方法:在加拿大魁北克省的一个普通人群样本中,完成了两种方法:采用SF-6Dv2设计的DCETTO和最佳最差随时间尺度(BWSTTO)(以下简称DCEBWS),以及采用优势选项和立即死亡状态(以下简称DCEDOD)的DCETTO。在DCEBWS中,所有参与者首先完成10个dceto选项(即选项A与选项B),然后完成3个BWSTTO。在DCEDOD中,相同的参与者首先完成相同的10个dceto选项,然后在主导选项(即a或B)和立即死亡状态之间重复选择。使用条件logit模型估计值集。使用贝叶斯信息准则、参数逻辑一致性和水平显著性来评估模型的性能。死亡状态对DCE潜在效用的直接影响是通过检查系数的大小、使用Bland-Altman图评估DCETTO与DCEBWS和DCEDOD估计的值集之间的一致性、比死亡严重的健康状态(WTD)的比例以及分析估计值的范围来评估的。结果:从398名参与者中,共有348名参与者被纳入最终分析。DCEBWS中具有非逻辑一致性和非显著性系数的参数数量较少。在所有方法中观察到的维度相对重要性的一致性表明了一个稳定可靠的排名。DCEDOD的效用范围(- 0.921比1)比DCETTO(- 1.578比1)和DCEBWS(- 1.150比1)窄。与DCETTO(47.19%)和DCEBWS(33.73%)相比,DCEDOD估计的WTD健康状态百分比(20.01%)较低。DCETTO和DCEBWS之间的一致性略强于DCETTO和DCEDOD之间,并且DCEDOD的平均效用值高于DCEBWS。结论:直接将立即死亡状态纳入DCE增加了实用价值。当立即死亡被包括在DCETTO(即DCEDOD)序列中时,这种增加高于被包括在DCETTO连续序列(即DCEBWS)中。使用DCEDOD可能更适合将死状态合并到DCE中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Direct Impact of Death on Discrete Choice Experiment Utilities

Background

The dead state can affect the value sets derived from discrete choice experiments (DCEs). Our aim was to empirically assess the direct impact of the immediate death state on health utilities using discrete choice experiment with time (DCETTO).

Methods

A sample of the general population in Quebec, Canada, completed two approaches: DCETTO followed by a best-worst scaling with time (BWSTTO) (hereafter referred to as DCEBWS), versus DCETTO followed by the dominated option and the immediate death state (hereafter referred to as DCEDOD), both designed with the SF-6Dv2. In DCEBWS, all participants first completed 10 DCETTO choices (i.e., option A vs B), followed by 3 BWSTTO. In DCEDOD, the same participants first completed the same 10 DCETTO choices, followed by a repeated choice between the dominated option (i.e., A or B) and the immediate death state. A conditional logit model was used to estimate value sets. The performance of models was assessed using goodness of fit using Bayesian information criterion, parameters’ logical consistency, and levels’ significance. The direct impact of the death state on DCE latent utilities was evaluated by examining the magnitude of coefficients, assessing the agreement among the value sets estimated by DCETTO with DCEBWS and with DCEDOD using Bland-Altman plots, the proportion of worst-than-dead (WTD) health states, and analyzing the range of estimated values.

Results

From 398 participants, a total of 348 participants were included for final analysis. The number of parameters with illogical consistency and non-significant coefficients was lower in DCEBWS. The observed consistency in the relative importance of dimensions across all approaches suggests a stable and reliable ranking. The utility range for DCEDOD (− 0.921 to 1) was narrower than for DCETTO (− 1.578 to 1) and DCEBWS (− 1.150 to 1). The DCEDOD estimated a lower percentage of WTD health states (20.01 %) compared to DCETTO (47.19 %) and DCEBWS (33.73 %). The agreement between DCETTO and DCEBWS was slightly stronger than between DCETTO and DCEDOD, and the mean utility values were higher in DCEDOD than in DCEBWS.

Conclusions

The inclusion of the immediate death state directly within DCE increased utility values. This increase was higher when the immediate death was included in a sequence within a DCETTO (i.e., DCEDOD) than when it was included in a continuum of DCETTO (i.e., DCEBWS). The use of DCEDOD was potentially better suited to incorporate the dead state into a DCE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy provides timely publication of cutting-edge research and expert opinion from this increasingly important field, making it a vital resource for payers, providers and researchers alike. The journal includes high quality economic research and reviews of all aspects of healthcare from various perspectives and countries, designed to communicate the latest applied information in health economics and health policy. While emphasis is placed on information with practical applications, a strong basis of underlying scientific rigor is maintained.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信