对采用mlop的挑战进行了分析

IF 15.6 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Chintan Amrit, Ashwini Kolar Narayanappa
{"title":"对采用mlop的挑战进行了分析","authors":"Chintan Amrit,&nbsp;Ashwini Kolar Narayanappa","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2024.100637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The field of MLOps (Machine Learning Operations), which focuses on effectively managing and operationalizing ML workflows, has grown because of the advancements in machine learning (ML). The goal of this study is to examine and contrast the difficulties encountered in the implementation of MLOps in enterprises with those encountered in DevOps. An SLR (Systematic Literature Review) is the first step in the research process to find the issues raised in the literature. The results of this study are based on qualitative content analysis using grounded theory and semi-structured interviews with 12 ML practitioners from different sectors. Organisational, technical, operational, and business problems are the four distinct aspects of challenges for MLOps that our study highlights. These challenges are further defined by eleven different themes. Our research indicates that while some issues, such as data and model complexity, are unique to MLOps, others are shared by DevOps and MLOps as well. The report offers suggestions for further research and summarises the difficulties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"10 1","pages":"Article 100637"},"PeriodicalIF":15.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An analysis of the challenges in the adoption of MLOps\",\"authors\":\"Chintan Amrit,&nbsp;Ashwini Kolar Narayanappa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jik.2024.100637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The field of MLOps (Machine Learning Operations), which focuses on effectively managing and operationalizing ML workflows, has grown because of the advancements in machine learning (ML). The goal of this study is to examine and contrast the difficulties encountered in the implementation of MLOps in enterprises with those encountered in DevOps. An SLR (Systematic Literature Review) is the first step in the research process to find the issues raised in the literature. The results of this study are based on qualitative content analysis using grounded theory and semi-structured interviews with 12 ML practitioners from different sectors. Organisational, technical, operational, and business problems are the four distinct aspects of challenges for MLOps that our study highlights. These challenges are further defined by eleven different themes. Our research indicates that while some issues, such as data and model complexity, are unique to MLOps, others are shared by DevOps and MLOps as well. The report offers suggestions for further research and summarises the difficulties.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X24001768\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X24001768","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

MLOps(机器学习操作)领域专注于有效管理和操作机器学习工作流,由于机器学习(ML)的进步而不断发展。本研究的目的是检查和对比企业在实施MLOps和DevOps时遇到的困难。系统性文献综述(SLR)是研究过程中发现文献中提出的问题的第一步。本研究的结果基于定性内容分析,使用扎根理论和对来自不同行业的12名ML从业者的半结构化访谈。我们的研究强调了组织、技术、运营和业务问题是MLOps面临的四个不同方面的挑战。这些挑战由11个不同的主题进一步定义。我们的研究表明,虽然有些问题(如数据和模型复杂性)是mlop所独有的,但其他问题也是DevOps和mlop所共有的。该报告提出了进一步研究的建议,并总结了困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An analysis of the challenges in the adoption of MLOps
The field of MLOps (Machine Learning Operations), which focuses on effectively managing and operationalizing ML workflows, has grown because of the advancements in machine learning (ML). The goal of this study is to examine and contrast the difficulties encountered in the implementation of MLOps in enterprises with those encountered in DevOps. An SLR (Systematic Literature Review) is the first step in the research process to find the issues raised in the literature. The results of this study are based on qualitative content analysis using grounded theory and semi-structured interviews with 12 ML practitioners from different sectors. Organisational, technical, operational, and business problems are the four distinct aspects of challenges for MLOps that our study highlights. These challenges are further defined by eleven different themes. Our research indicates that while some issues, such as data and model complexity, are unique to MLOps, others are shared by DevOps and MLOps as well. The report offers suggestions for further research and summarises the difficulties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
12.70%
发文量
118
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices. JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience. In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信