耳聋和特殊学习障碍:一种可能的共病。

IF 2.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Elena Tomasuolo , Arianna Bello , Manuela Gragnaniello , Alessandra Resca , Maddalena Bassoli , Erika Benassi
{"title":"耳聋和特殊学习障碍:一种可能的共病。","authors":"Elena Tomasuolo ,&nbsp;Arianna Bello ,&nbsp;Manuela Gragnaniello ,&nbsp;Alessandra Resca ,&nbsp;Maddalena Bassoli ,&nbsp;Erika Benassi","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Background and aim: Most children and adolescents with deafness receive one or two cochlear implants (CIs). Despite the CI expanding the potential for auditory rehabilitation in deaf children, the improvements in language and literacy skills of some of these children do not align with the expected outcomes. As the main research question, we wondered if the reading and writing deficits reported in some deaf children with CIs may be characterized as a domain-specific learning disorder, rather than only a consequence of deafness. Thus, we analyzed the academic discrepancies, in both reading and writing, between two groups of deaf children with early CI. Method: Three prelingually deaf children with CI and with unexplained disproportionate learning disorders (Deaf+LD group) were compared to control deaf children with similar clinical history, age at CI implantation and auditory experience (Deaf group). The Deaf+LD group was also matched on chronological age to three hearing children with Specific Learning Disorder (SLD group). Results: The results showed that the three cases of the Deaf+LD group demonstrated severe reading and writing deficits, with performances significantly below the age level, similarly to children of the SLD group. By contrast, the three children of the Deaf group demonstrated normal reading and writing abilities. Conclusions: We suggested considering the possibility of comorbidity between deafness and SLD. This hypothesis was supported by the specific features of the language profile that justify such an association; in fact, deaf children with presumed SLD have profiles much more similar to hearing children with SLD than to other deaf children.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 104632"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deafness and Specific Learning Disorder: towards a possible comorbidity\",\"authors\":\"Elena Tomasuolo ,&nbsp;Arianna Bello ,&nbsp;Manuela Gragnaniello ,&nbsp;Alessandra Resca ,&nbsp;Maddalena Bassoli ,&nbsp;Erika Benassi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Background and aim: Most children and adolescents with deafness receive one or two cochlear implants (CIs). Despite the CI expanding the potential for auditory rehabilitation in deaf children, the improvements in language and literacy skills of some of these children do not align with the expected outcomes. As the main research question, we wondered if the reading and writing deficits reported in some deaf children with CIs may be characterized as a domain-specific learning disorder, rather than only a consequence of deafness. Thus, we analyzed the academic discrepancies, in both reading and writing, between two groups of deaf children with early CI. Method: Three prelingually deaf children with CI and with unexplained disproportionate learning disorders (Deaf+LD group) were compared to control deaf children with similar clinical history, age at CI implantation and auditory experience (Deaf group). The Deaf+LD group was also matched on chronological age to three hearing children with Specific Learning Disorder (SLD group). Results: The results showed that the three cases of the Deaf+LD group demonstrated severe reading and writing deficits, with performances significantly below the age level, similarly to children of the SLD group. By contrast, the three children of the Deaf group demonstrated normal reading and writing abilities. Conclusions: We suggested considering the possibility of comorbidity between deafness and SLD. This hypothesis was supported by the specific features of the language profile that justify such an association; in fact, deaf children with presumed SLD have profiles much more similar to hearing children with SLD than to other deaf children.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"volume\":\"251 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104632\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691824005109\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691824005109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:大多数耳聋儿童和青少年接受一到两次人工耳蜗植入。尽管CI扩大了聋儿听觉康复的潜力,但其中一些儿童在语言和识字技能方面的改善与预期的结果并不一致。作为主要的研究问题,我们想知道在一些患有CIs的聋儿中报道的阅读和写作缺陷是否可能被描述为一种特定领域的学习障碍,而不仅仅是耳聋的结果。因此,我们分析了两组早期CI失聪儿童在阅读和写作方面的学术差异。方法:将3例伴有CI和不明原因不成比例学习障碍的语前聋儿童(聋+LD组)与具有相似临床病史、CI植入年龄和听觉经历的对照组聋儿(聋组)进行比较。聋人+学习障碍组也与三名患有特殊学习障碍的听力儿童(SLD组)按实际年龄进行匹配。结果:结果显示,聋儿+LD组的3例患儿表现出严重的阅读和写作缺陷,其表现明显低于年龄水平,与SLD组相似。相比之下,聋哑人组的三个孩子表现出正常的阅读和写作能力。结论:我们建议考虑耳聋和SLD合并症的可能性。这一假设得到了语言特征的支持,这些特征证明了这种联系是正确的;事实上,假定患有特殊语言障碍的失聪儿童的特征与患有特殊语言障碍的正常儿童比其他失聪儿童更相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Deafness and Specific Learning Disorder: towards a possible comorbidity

Deafness and Specific Learning Disorder: towards a possible comorbidity
Background and aim: Most children and adolescents with deafness receive one or two cochlear implants (CIs). Despite the CI expanding the potential for auditory rehabilitation in deaf children, the improvements in language and literacy skills of some of these children do not align with the expected outcomes. As the main research question, we wondered if the reading and writing deficits reported in some deaf children with CIs may be characterized as a domain-specific learning disorder, rather than only a consequence of deafness. Thus, we analyzed the academic discrepancies, in both reading and writing, between two groups of deaf children with early CI. Method: Three prelingually deaf children with CI and with unexplained disproportionate learning disorders (Deaf+LD group) were compared to control deaf children with similar clinical history, age at CI implantation and auditory experience (Deaf group). The Deaf+LD group was also matched on chronological age to three hearing children with Specific Learning Disorder (SLD group). Results: The results showed that the three cases of the Deaf+LD group demonstrated severe reading and writing deficits, with performances significantly below the age level, similarly to children of the SLD group. By contrast, the three children of the Deaf group demonstrated normal reading and writing abilities. Conclusions: We suggested considering the possibility of comorbidity between deafness and SLD. This hypothesis was supported by the specific features of the language profile that justify such an association; in fact, deaf children with presumed SLD have profiles much more similar to hearing children with SLD than to other deaf children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信