斯洛伐克和捷克共和国住宅氡活度浓度测定方法的实验室间比较

IF 2.8 3区 物理与天体物理 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Vendula Filová, Vladimír Lesay, Josef Holeček, Branislav Vrban, Jakub Lüley, Štefan Čerba, Otto Glavo, Vladimír Nečas
{"title":"斯洛伐克和捷克共和国住宅氡活度浓度测定方法的实验室间比较","authors":"Vendula Filová, Vladimír Lesay, Josef Holeček, Branislav Vrban, Jakub Lüley, Štefan Čerba, Otto Glavo, Vladimír Nečas","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.112429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three methods for the measurement of the radon activity concentration were compared in a series of measurements in the Slovak and Czech Republics. Two methods were based on solid-state nuclear track detectors, TASTRAK (PADC) and RamaRn (LR 115), the third method was based on a semiconductor detector (Airthings Corentium Home). Seven sites were selected for comparison, the measurements were carried out in 21 rooms in total. The comparison shows agreement in the results within the range of uncertainties in the majority of measurements.","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interlaboratory comparison of methods for determining radon activity concentration in dwellings in Slovakia and the Czech Republic\",\"authors\":\"Vendula Filová, Vladimír Lesay, Josef Holeček, Branislav Vrban, Jakub Lüley, Štefan Čerba, Otto Glavo, Vladimír Nečas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.112429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Three methods for the measurement of the radon activity concentration were compared in a series of measurements in the Slovak and Czech Republics. Two methods were based on solid-state nuclear track detectors, TASTRAK (PADC) and RamaRn (LR 115), the third method was based on a semiconductor detector (Airthings Corentium Home). Seven sites were selected for comparison, the measurements were carried out in 21 rooms in total. The comparison shows agreement in the results within the range of uncertainties in the majority of measurements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Physics and Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Physics and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.112429\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.112429","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在斯洛伐克和捷克共和国的一系列测量中比较了测量氡活度浓度的三种方法。两种方法是基于固体核径迹探测器TASTRAK (PADC)和RamaRn (LR 115),第三种方法是基于半导体探测器Airthings Corentium Home。选择了7个地点进行比较,总共在21个房间中进行了测量。比较表明,在大多数测量的不确定度范围内,结果是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interlaboratory comparison of methods for determining radon activity concentration in dwellings in Slovakia and the Czech Republic
Three methods for the measurement of the radon activity concentration were compared in a series of measurements in the Slovak and Czech Republics. Two methods were based on solid-state nuclear track detectors, TASTRAK (PADC) and RamaRn (LR 115), the third method was based on a semiconductor detector (Airthings Corentium Home). Seven sites were selected for comparison, the measurements were carried out in 21 rooms in total. The comparison shows agreement in the results within the range of uncertainties in the majority of measurements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Physics and Chemistry
Radiation Physics and Chemistry 化学-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
17.20%
发文量
574
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing. The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信