Eduardo Redondo-Cerezo, Raúl Fernandez-García, Manuel López Vico, Eva Julissa Ortega-Suazo, Cristina Tendero-Peinado, Jose María López-Tobaruela, Ana Lancho, Francisco Valverde-López, Juan Gabriel Martínez-Cara, Rita Jiménez-Rosales
{"title":"抗栓治疗中上消化道出血患者的住院和延迟死亡率:停药和恢复的影响","authors":"Eduardo Redondo-Cerezo, Raúl Fernandez-García, Manuel López Vico, Eva Julissa Ortega-Suazo, Cristina Tendero-Peinado, Jose María López-Tobaruela, Ana Lancho, Francisco Valverde-López, Juan Gabriel Martínez-Cara, Rita Jiménez-Rosales","doi":"10.1080/00325481.2024.2436840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antithrombotic drugs pose a dual challenge to acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, with associated risks of bleeding complications and thromboembolic events upon withdrawal. We aimed to determine the impact of antithrombotic medications on in-hospital and delayed outcomes and whether suspension and resumption influenced delayed mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a prospective registry analysis of patients between 2013-2021. Anticoagulants and antiplatelets were classified as antithrombotic. The examined outcomes included in-hospital mortality and delayed 6-month cardiovascular, bleeding, and mortality events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1345 patients were included. 21.7% were taking anticoagulants and 19.1% were taking antiplatelets. Patients on antithrombotic therapy have a longer delay in endoscopic performance (11 ± 11 h vs. 9.6 ± 8 h; <i>p</i> = 0.027) and less need for therapy (38.5% vs. 48.1%;<i>p</i> = 0.002), with gastric erosion being more usual (14.2% vs. 9.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.006).In-hospital mortality was higher in patients not taking antithrombotic (12% vs. 8%;<i>p</i> = 0.022) and suspension < 72 h was associated with increased mortality (14.9% vs. 2.3%;<i>p</i> = 0.001).Delayed mortality was higher in patients taking antithrombotic (9.4% vs. 6%; <i>p</i>=0.034) and in those who suspended them for more than 7days (17% vs. 8.7%; <i>p</i>=0.033), with no differences when it lasted<72h.Patients on antithrombotic therapy exhibited more delayed cardiovascular (13.7% vs. 3.4%; <i>p</i><0.0001) and hemorrhagic events (22.9% vs. 12.9%; <i>p</i><0.0001), with no differences observed in patients who withheld antithrombotic medication.Multivariate analysis identified ASA, disseminated malignancy, and NSAIDs as independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality, whereas antithrombotic therapy and hemoglobin levels were protective factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding treated with antithrombotic drugs had lower in-hospital mortality despite increased comorbidities and older age. Conversely, delayed 6-month mortality was higher. Shorter antithrombotic suspension durations increased in-hospital mortality, whereas suspension for > 7 days increased delayed mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":94176,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-hospital and delayed mortality in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding on antithrombotic treatment: effects of withdrawal and resuming.\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo Redondo-Cerezo, Raúl Fernandez-García, Manuel López Vico, Eva Julissa Ortega-Suazo, Cristina Tendero-Peinado, Jose María López-Tobaruela, Ana Lancho, Francisco Valverde-López, Juan Gabriel Martínez-Cara, Rita Jiménez-Rosales\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00325481.2024.2436840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antithrombotic drugs pose a dual challenge to acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, with associated risks of bleeding complications and thromboembolic events upon withdrawal. We aimed to determine the impact of antithrombotic medications on in-hospital and delayed outcomes and whether suspension and resumption influenced delayed mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a prospective registry analysis of patients between 2013-2021. Anticoagulants and antiplatelets were classified as antithrombotic. The examined outcomes included in-hospital mortality and delayed 6-month cardiovascular, bleeding, and mortality events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1345 patients were included. 21.7% were taking anticoagulants and 19.1% were taking antiplatelets. Patients on antithrombotic therapy have a longer delay in endoscopic performance (11 ± 11 h vs. 9.6 ± 8 h; <i>p</i> = 0.027) and less need for therapy (38.5% vs. 48.1%;<i>p</i> = 0.002), with gastric erosion being more usual (14.2% vs. 9.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.006).In-hospital mortality was higher in patients not taking antithrombotic (12% vs. 8%;<i>p</i> = 0.022) and suspension < 72 h was associated with increased mortality (14.9% vs. 2.3%;<i>p</i> = 0.001).Delayed mortality was higher in patients taking antithrombotic (9.4% vs. 6%; <i>p</i>=0.034) and in those who suspended them for more than 7days (17% vs. 8.7%; <i>p</i>=0.033), with no differences when it lasted<72h.Patients on antithrombotic therapy exhibited more delayed cardiovascular (13.7% vs. 3.4%; <i>p</i><0.0001) and hemorrhagic events (22.9% vs. 12.9%; <i>p</i><0.0001), with no differences observed in patients who withheld antithrombotic medication.Multivariate analysis identified ASA, disseminated malignancy, and NSAIDs as independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality, whereas antithrombotic therapy and hemoglobin levels were protective factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding treated with antithrombotic drugs had lower in-hospital mortality despite increased comorbidities and older age. Conversely, delayed 6-month mortality was higher. Shorter antithrombotic suspension durations increased in-hospital mortality, whereas suspension for > 7 days increased delayed mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postgraduate medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postgraduate medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2024.2436840\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2024.2436840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:抗栓药物对急性上消化道出血构成双重挑战,在停药后存在出血并发症和血栓栓塞事件的相关风险。我们的目的是确定抗血栓药物对住院和延迟结局的影响,以及暂停和恢复是否影响延迟死亡率。方法:本研究对2013-2021年间的患者进行前瞻性登记分析。抗凝剂和抗血小板被归为抗血栓药物。检查的结果包括住院死亡率和延迟6个月的心血管、出血和死亡事件。结果:共纳入1345例患者。21.7%服用抗凝血药物,19.1%服用抗血小板药物。接受抗栓治疗的患者在内镜下表现的延迟时间更长(11±11小时比9.6±8小时;P = 0.027)和较少的治疗需求(38.5%比48.1%;P = 0.002),胃糜烂更常见(14.2%比9.1%;p = 0.006)。未服用抗栓药物的患者住院死亡率更高(12% vs 8%;p = 0.022)和悬浮液(p = 0.001)。服用抗栓药物的患者延迟死亡率更高(9.4% vs. 6%;P =0.034),停学7天以上的学生(17% vs. 8.7%;p=0.033),持续时间无差异。结论:抗栓药物治疗的上消化道出血患者住院死亡率较低,但合并症增加且年龄增大。相反,延迟6个月的死亡率更高。较短的抗凝停药时间增加了住院死亡率,而停药7天增加了延迟死亡率。
In-hospital and delayed mortality in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding on antithrombotic treatment: effects of withdrawal and resuming.
Background: Antithrombotic drugs pose a dual challenge to acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, with associated risks of bleeding complications and thromboembolic events upon withdrawal. We aimed to determine the impact of antithrombotic medications on in-hospital and delayed outcomes and whether suspension and resumption influenced delayed mortality.
Methods: This study was a prospective registry analysis of patients between 2013-2021. Anticoagulants and antiplatelets were classified as antithrombotic. The examined outcomes included in-hospital mortality and delayed 6-month cardiovascular, bleeding, and mortality events.
Results: A total of 1345 patients were included. 21.7% were taking anticoagulants and 19.1% were taking antiplatelets. Patients on antithrombotic therapy have a longer delay in endoscopic performance (11 ± 11 h vs. 9.6 ± 8 h; p = 0.027) and less need for therapy (38.5% vs. 48.1%;p = 0.002), with gastric erosion being more usual (14.2% vs. 9.1%; p = 0.006).In-hospital mortality was higher in patients not taking antithrombotic (12% vs. 8%;p = 0.022) and suspension < 72 h was associated with increased mortality (14.9% vs. 2.3%;p = 0.001).Delayed mortality was higher in patients taking antithrombotic (9.4% vs. 6%; p=0.034) and in those who suspended them for more than 7days (17% vs. 8.7%; p=0.033), with no differences when it lasted<72h.Patients on antithrombotic therapy exhibited more delayed cardiovascular (13.7% vs. 3.4%; p<0.0001) and hemorrhagic events (22.9% vs. 12.9%; p<0.0001), with no differences observed in patients who withheld antithrombotic medication.Multivariate analysis identified ASA, disseminated malignancy, and NSAIDs as independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality, whereas antithrombotic therapy and hemoglobin levels were protective factors.
Conclusion: Patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding treated with antithrombotic drugs had lower in-hospital mortality despite increased comorbidities and older age. Conversely, delayed 6-month mortality was higher. Shorter antithrombotic suspension durations increased in-hospital mortality, whereas suspension for > 7 days increased delayed mortality.