基于机器学习的人工智能拉曼检测与识别系统(AIRDIS)对金黄色葡萄球菌、粪肠球菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、铜绿假单胞菌和鲍曼不动杆菌的拉曼光谱识别

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Yu-Tzu Lin , Hsiu-Hsien Lin , Chih-Hao Chen , Kun-Hao Tseng , Pang-Chien Hsu , Ya-Lun Wu , Wei-Cheng Chang , Nai-Shun Liao , Yi-Fan Chou , Chun-Yi Hsu , Yu-Hui Liao , Mao-Wang Ho , Shih-Sheng Chang , Po-Ren Hsueh , Der-Yang Cho
{"title":"基于机器学习的人工智能拉曼检测与识别系统(AIRDIS)对金黄色葡萄球菌、粪肠球菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、铜绿假单胞菌和鲍曼不动杆菌的拉曼光谱识别","authors":"Yu-Tzu Lin ,&nbsp;Hsiu-Hsien Lin ,&nbsp;Chih-Hao Chen ,&nbsp;Kun-Hao Tseng ,&nbsp;Pang-Chien Hsu ,&nbsp;Ya-Lun Wu ,&nbsp;Wei-Cheng Chang ,&nbsp;Nai-Shun Liao ,&nbsp;Yi-Fan Chou ,&nbsp;Chun-Yi Hsu ,&nbsp;Yu-Hui Liao ,&nbsp;Mao-Wang Ho ,&nbsp;Shih-Sheng Chang ,&nbsp;Po-Ren Hsueh ,&nbsp;Der-Yang Cho","doi":"10.1016/j.jmii.2024.11.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Rapid and accurate identification of bacteria is required in order to develop effective treatment strategies. Traditional culture-based methods are time-consuming, while MALDI-TOF MS is expensive. The Raman spectroscopy, due to its relatively cost-effectiveness, offers a promising alternative for bacterial identification. However, its clinical utility still requires further validation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this study, the artificial intelligent Raman detection and identification system (AIRDIS) was implemented to identify bacterial species, including <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (n = 1290), <em>Enterococcus faecium</em> (n = 1020), <em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em> (n = 1366), <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> (n = 1067), and <em>Acinetobacter baumannii</em> (n = 811). Raman spectra were collected, preprocessed, and analyzed by machine learning (ML).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After training on 24,420 Raman spectra from 1221 isolates and testing on 4333 isolates, the AIRDIS demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99 for Gram classification, with accuracies of 97.64 % for Gram-positive bacteria and 98.86 % for Gram-negative bacteria. Spectral differences between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria were linked to structural variations in their cell walls, such as peptidoglycan and lipopolysaccharides. At the species level, <em>S. aureus</em>, <em>E. faecium</em>, <em>K. pneumoniae</em>, <em>P. aeruginosa</em>, and <em>A. baumannii</em> were identified with high accuracy, ranging from 94.76 % to 96.88 %, with all species achieving an AUC of 0.99.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Validation with a large number of clinical isolates demonstrated Raman spectroscopy combined with ML excels in identification of five bacterial species associated with multidrug resistance. This finding confirms the clinical utility of the system while laying a solid foundation for the future development of antimicrobial resistance prediction models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56117,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","volume":"58 1","pages":"Pages 77-85"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecium, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii from Raman spectra by Artificial Intelligent Raman Detection and Identification System (AIRDIS) with machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Tzu Lin ,&nbsp;Hsiu-Hsien Lin ,&nbsp;Chih-Hao Chen ,&nbsp;Kun-Hao Tseng ,&nbsp;Pang-Chien Hsu ,&nbsp;Ya-Lun Wu ,&nbsp;Wei-Cheng Chang ,&nbsp;Nai-Shun Liao ,&nbsp;Yi-Fan Chou ,&nbsp;Chun-Yi Hsu ,&nbsp;Yu-Hui Liao ,&nbsp;Mao-Wang Ho ,&nbsp;Shih-Sheng Chang ,&nbsp;Po-Ren Hsueh ,&nbsp;Der-Yang Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmii.2024.11.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Rapid and accurate identification of bacteria is required in order to develop effective treatment strategies. Traditional culture-based methods are time-consuming, while MALDI-TOF MS is expensive. The Raman spectroscopy, due to its relatively cost-effectiveness, offers a promising alternative for bacterial identification. However, its clinical utility still requires further validation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this study, the artificial intelligent Raman detection and identification system (AIRDIS) was implemented to identify bacterial species, including <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (n = 1290), <em>Enterococcus faecium</em> (n = 1020), <em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em> (n = 1366), <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> (n = 1067), and <em>Acinetobacter baumannii</em> (n = 811). Raman spectra were collected, preprocessed, and analyzed by machine learning (ML).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After training on 24,420 Raman spectra from 1221 isolates and testing on 4333 isolates, the AIRDIS demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99 for Gram classification, with accuracies of 97.64 % for Gram-positive bacteria and 98.86 % for Gram-negative bacteria. Spectral differences between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria were linked to structural variations in their cell walls, such as peptidoglycan and lipopolysaccharides. At the species level, <em>S. aureus</em>, <em>E. faecium</em>, <em>K. pneumoniae</em>, <em>P. aeruginosa</em>, and <em>A. baumannii</em> were identified with high accuracy, ranging from 94.76 % to 96.88 %, with all species achieving an AUC of 0.99.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Validation with a large number of clinical isolates demonstrated Raman spectroscopy combined with ML excels in identification of five bacterial species associated with multidrug resistance. This finding confirms the clinical utility of the system while laying a solid foundation for the future development of antimicrobial resistance prediction models.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 77-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118224002202\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118224002202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了制定有效的治疗策略,需要快速准确地鉴定细菌。传统的基于培养的方法耗时长,而MALDI-TOF质谱法价格昂贵。拉曼光谱由于其相对的成本效益,为细菌鉴定提供了一个有前途的替代方案。然而,其临床应用仍需进一步验证。方法:本研究采用人工智能拉曼检测识别系统(AIRDIS)对金黄色葡萄球菌(1290株)、屎肠球菌(1020株)、肺炎克雷伯菌(1366株)、铜绿假单胞菌(1067株)、鲍曼不动杆菌(811株)等细菌进行鉴定。拉曼光谱采集、预处理和机器学习分析。结果:经1221株菌株的24420张拉曼光谱训练和4333株菌株的检测,AIRDIS对革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌的分类准确率分别为97.64%和98.86%,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.99。革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌的光谱差异与细胞壁的结构变化有关,如肽聚糖和脂多糖。在种水平上,金黄色葡萄球菌、粪肠球菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、铜绿假单胞菌和鲍曼假单胞菌的鉴定准确率在94.76% ~ 96.88%之间,所有种的AUC均达到0.99。结论:通过大量临床分离菌株的验证,拉曼光谱联合ML在鉴定5种与多药耐药相关的细菌方面表现出色。这一发现证实了该系统的临床实用性,同时也为未来抗菌药物耐药性预测模型的发展奠定了坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identification of Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecium, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii from Raman spectra by Artificial Intelligent Raman Detection and Identification System (AIRDIS) with machine learning

Background

Rapid and accurate identification of bacteria is required in order to develop effective treatment strategies. Traditional culture-based methods are time-consuming, while MALDI-TOF MS is expensive. The Raman spectroscopy, due to its relatively cost-effectiveness, offers a promising alternative for bacterial identification. However, its clinical utility still requires further validation.

Methods

In this study, the artificial intelligent Raman detection and identification system (AIRDIS) was implemented to identify bacterial species, including Staphylococcus aureus (n = 1290), Enterococcus faecium (n = 1020), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 1366), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1067), and Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 811). Raman spectra were collected, preprocessed, and analyzed by machine learning (ML).

Results

After training on 24,420 Raman spectra from 1221 isolates and testing on 4333 isolates, the AIRDIS demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99 for Gram classification, with accuracies of 97.64 % for Gram-positive bacteria and 98.86 % for Gram-negative bacteria. Spectral differences between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria were linked to structural variations in their cell walls, such as peptidoglycan and lipopolysaccharides. At the species level, S. aureus, E. faecium, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii were identified with high accuracy, ranging from 94.76 % to 96.88 %, with all species achieving an AUC of 0.99.

Conclusions

Validation with a large number of clinical isolates demonstrated Raman spectroscopy combined with ML excels in identification of five bacterial species associated with multidrug resistance. This finding confirms the clinical utility of the system while laying a solid foundation for the future development of antimicrobial resistance prediction models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
5.40%
发文量
159
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection is an open access journal, committed to disseminating information on the latest trends and advances in microbiology, immunology, infectious diseases and parasitology. Article types considered include perspectives, review articles, original articles, brief reports and correspondence. With the aim of promoting effective and accurate scientific information, an expert panel of referees constitutes the backbone of the peer-review process in evaluating the quality and content of manuscripts submitted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信