Ahmad Sweid, Ahmad Chahine, Stephanie Hage, Rami Z Morsi, Sonam Thind, Lina Karar, Archit Baskaran, Julián Carrión-Penagos, Harsh Desai, Sachin A Kothari, Rohini Rana, Okker Verhagen Metman, Jehad Zakaria, James E Siegler, Issam Awad, Michael C Hurley, Shyam Prabhakaran, Sean Polster, Tareq Kass-Hout
{"title":"第四代管道™优势导流:首次报道了美国安全性和可行性的经验。","authors":"Ahmad Sweid, Ahmad Chahine, Stephanie Hage, Rami Z Morsi, Sonam Thind, Lina Karar, Archit Baskaran, Julián Carrión-Penagos, Harsh Desai, Sachin A Kothari, Rohini Rana, Okker Verhagen Metman, Jehad Zakaria, James E Siegler, Issam Awad, Michael C Hurley, Shyam Prabhakaran, Sean Polster, Tareq Kass-Hout","doi":"10.1177/15910199241301119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Pipeline<sup>™</sup> Vantage embolization device (Medtronic, Irvine, CA) is the fourth generation of Pipeline flow diverter devices, offering numerous technical improvements. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of The Pipeline<sup>™</sup> Vantage embolization device (Medtronic, Irvine, CA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective study describing the use of The Pipeline<sup>™</sup> Vantage embolization device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Technical feasibility and safety were assessed in terms of intra and postprocedural complications, as well as neurological morbidity upon follow-up. Both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 12 patients in our study (mean age 62; females: <i>n</i> = 9/12, 75%). Aneurysm morphology varied between saccular (41.6%), fusiform (41.6%), blister (8.3%), and pseudoaneurysm (8.3%). Three cases (25%) involved ruptured aneurysms treated in the acute setting. A transradial access was used in 10 cases (83.3%). There was a 100% success in deployment. Seven cases (58.3%) were treated with adjunct embolization device other than a flow diversion. Eight cases (66.6%) were treated with a single flow diversion, three cases (25%) were treated with two flow diversion, and one case (8.3%) was treated with three flow diversion stents. There were no intraoperative complications. There was one postprocedural complication in a dissecting ruptured PICA aneurysm that was ultimately treated with two flow diversion stents and an intrasaccular device.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>To our knowledge, this is the first US series assessing the periprocedural safety and feasibility of consecutive patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with the Pipeline<sup>™</sup> Vantage device (Medtronic, Irvine, CA).</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241301119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fourth-generation Pipeline<sup>™</sup> Vantage flow diversion: First reported US experience of safety and feasibility.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Sweid, Ahmad Chahine, Stephanie Hage, Rami Z Morsi, Sonam Thind, Lina Karar, Archit Baskaran, Julián Carrión-Penagos, Harsh Desai, Sachin A Kothari, Rohini Rana, Okker Verhagen Metman, Jehad Zakaria, James E Siegler, Issam Awad, Michael C Hurley, Shyam Prabhakaran, Sean Polster, Tareq Kass-Hout\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15910199241301119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Pipeline<sup>™</sup> Vantage embolization device (Medtronic, Irvine, CA) is the fourth generation of Pipeline flow diverter devices, offering numerous technical improvements. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of The Pipeline<sup>™</sup> Vantage embolization device (Medtronic, Irvine, CA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective study describing the use of The Pipeline<sup>™</sup> Vantage embolization device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Technical feasibility and safety were assessed in terms of intra and postprocedural complications, as well as neurological morbidity upon follow-up. Both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 12 patients in our study (mean age 62; females: <i>n</i> = 9/12, 75%). Aneurysm morphology varied between saccular (41.6%), fusiform (41.6%), blister (8.3%), and pseudoaneurysm (8.3%). Three cases (25%) involved ruptured aneurysms treated in the acute setting. A transradial access was used in 10 cases (83.3%). There was a 100% success in deployment. Seven cases (58.3%) were treated with adjunct embolization device other than a flow diversion. Eight cases (66.6%) were treated with a single flow diversion, three cases (25%) were treated with two flow diversion, and one case (8.3%) was treated with three flow diversion stents. There were no intraoperative complications. There was one postprocedural complication in a dissecting ruptured PICA aneurysm that was ultimately treated with two flow diversion stents and an intrasaccular device.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>To our knowledge, this is the first US series assessing the periprocedural safety and feasibility of consecutive patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with the Pipeline<sup>™</sup> Vantage device (Medtronic, Irvine, CA).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15910199241301119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618843/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241301119\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241301119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fourth-generation Pipeline™ Vantage flow diversion: First reported US experience of safety and feasibility.
Background: The Pipeline™ Vantage embolization device (Medtronic, Irvine, CA) is the fourth generation of Pipeline flow diverter devices, offering numerous technical improvements. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of The Pipeline™ Vantage embolization device (Medtronic, Irvine, CA).
Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study describing the use of The Pipeline™ Vantage embolization device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Technical feasibility and safety were assessed in terms of intra and postprocedural complications, as well as neurological morbidity upon follow-up. Both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms were included.
Results: We included 12 patients in our study (mean age 62; females: n = 9/12, 75%). Aneurysm morphology varied between saccular (41.6%), fusiform (41.6%), blister (8.3%), and pseudoaneurysm (8.3%). Three cases (25%) involved ruptured aneurysms treated in the acute setting. A transradial access was used in 10 cases (83.3%). There was a 100% success in deployment. Seven cases (58.3%) were treated with adjunct embolization device other than a flow diversion. Eight cases (66.6%) were treated with a single flow diversion, three cases (25%) were treated with two flow diversion, and one case (8.3%) was treated with three flow diversion stents. There were no intraoperative complications. There was one postprocedural complication in a dissecting ruptured PICA aneurysm that was ultimately treated with two flow diversion stents and an intrasaccular device.
Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first US series assessing the periprocedural safety and feasibility of consecutive patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with the Pipeline™ Vantage device (Medtronic, Irvine, CA).
期刊介绍:
Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...