Andreea-Roxana Florescu, Stefan Mihaicuta, Stefan Marian Frent, Oana-Claudia Deleanu, Mariela Romina Birza, Alina Mirela Popa, Andrei Raul Manzur, Loredana Gligor, Andras Bikov
{"title":"阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者复合脂质指数与巴韦诺分型的关系。","authors":"Andreea-Roxana Florescu, Stefan Mihaicuta, Stefan Marian Frent, Oana-Claudia Deleanu, Mariela Romina Birza, Alina Mirela Popa, Andrei Raul Manzur, Loredana Gligor, Andras Bikov","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-80113-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) is associated with the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, the risk is only weekly related to OSA severity traditionally determined by the apnoea-hypopnoea index. The Baveno classification was developed to improve patient selection who would benefit from OSA treatment in terms of symptoms improvement and CVD risk reduction. However, it is unclear how the classification relates to biomarkers of CVD risk. Composite lipid indices were evaluated in various populations and showed good predictive value for incident CVD. One thousand two hundred and forty-two patients with OSA were included in the study. Composite lipid indices, including the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), visceral adiposity index (VAI), lipid accumulation product (LAP) and cardiometabolic index (CMI) were compared between different Baveno groups (A - minor symptoms, minor comorbidities, B - severe symptoms, minor comorbidities, C - minor symptoms, severe comorbidities, D - severe symptoms, severe comorbidities). All composite lipid indices were higher in group D versus groups A and C. Only LAP (86.93 /58.40-119.49/ vs. 75.73 /48.37-99.04/) and CMI (1.03 /0.69-1.42/ vs. 0.91 /0.63-1.12/) were significantly different between the minimally symptomatic groups (C vs. A), and solely LAP was significantly higher (110.69 /76.76-147.22/ vs. 82.32 /60.35-113.50/) when the highly symptomatic groups (D vs. B) were compared. The Baveno classification correlates with cardiovascular risk estimated with composite lipid indices. Composite lipid indices may help better stratifying cardiovascular risk in both minimally- and highly symptomatic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"14 1","pages":"30384"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between composite lipid indices and baveno classification in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.\",\"authors\":\"Andreea-Roxana Florescu, Stefan Mihaicuta, Stefan Marian Frent, Oana-Claudia Deleanu, Mariela Romina Birza, Alina Mirela Popa, Andrei Raul Manzur, Loredana Gligor, Andras Bikov\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-024-80113-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) is associated with the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, the risk is only weekly related to OSA severity traditionally determined by the apnoea-hypopnoea index. The Baveno classification was developed to improve patient selection who would benefit from OSA treatment in terms of symptoms improvement and CVD risk reduction. However, it is unclear how the classification relates to biomarkers of CVD risk. Composite lipid indices were evaluated in various populations and showed good predictive value for incident CVD. One thousand two hundred and forty-two patients with OSA were included in the study. Composite lipid indices, including the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), visceral adiposity index (VAI), lipid accumulation product (LAP) and cardiometabolic index (CMI) were compared between different Baveno groups (A - minor symptoms, minor comorbidities, B - severe symptoms, minor comorbidities, C - minor symptoms, severe comorbidities, D - severe symptoms, severe comorbidities). All composite lipid indices were higher in group D versus groups A and C. Only LAP (86.93 /58.40-119.49/ vs. 75.73 /48.37-99.04/) and CMI (1.03 /0.69-1.42/ vs. 0.91 /0.63-1.12/) were significantly different between the minimally symptomatic groups (C vs. A), and solely LAP was significantly higher (110.69 /76.76-147.22/ vs. 82.32 /60.35-113.50/) when the highly symptomatic groups (D vs. B) were compared. The Baveno classification correlates with cardiovascular risk estimated with composite lipid indices. Composite lipid indices may help better stratifying cardiovascular risk in both minimally- and highly symptomatic patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"30384\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621549/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80113-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80113-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)与心血管疾病(CVD)的发生有关;然而,风险仅与每周的OSA严重程度相关,传统上由呼吸暂停-低通气指数决定。Baveno分类的发展是为了改善患者的选择,从症状改善和CVD风险降低方面来看,谁将从OSA治疗中受益。然而,目前尚不清楚这种分类与心血管疾病风险的生物标志物之间的关系。综合脂质指数在不同人群中进行了评估,显示出对心血管疾病的良好预测价值。这项研究包括了1242名阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者。比较不同Baveno组(A -轻微症状、轻微合并症、B -严重症状、轻微合并症、C -轻微症状、严重合并症、D -严重症状、严重合并症)患者血浆粥样硬化指数(AIP)、内脏脂肪指数(VAI)、脂质堆积积(LAP)、心脏代谢指数(CMI)等复合脂质指标。D组综合脂质指数均高于A、C组。只有轻度症状组间LAP (86.93 /58.40-119.49/ vs. 75.73 /48.37-99.04/)和CMI (1.03 /0.69-1.42/ vs. 0.91 /0.63-1.12/)差异有统计学意义(C组与A组),重度症状组间LAP (110.69 /76.76-147.22/ vs. 82.32 /60.35-113.50/)差异有统计学意义(D组与B组)。Baveno分级与复合脂质指数估计的心血管风险相关。复合脂质指数可能有助于更好地分层心血管风险在轻度和高度症状的患者。
The relationship between composite lipid indices and baveno classification in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.
Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) is associated with the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, the risk is only weekly related to OSA severity traditionally determined by the apnoea-hypopnoea index. The Baveno classification was developed to improve patient selection who would benefit from OSA treatment in terms of symptoms improvement and CVD risk reduction. However, it is unclear how the classification relates to biomarkers of CVD risk. Composite lipid indices were evaluated in various populations and showed good predictive value for incident CVD. One thousand two hundred and forty-two patients with OSA were included in the study. Composite lipid indices, including the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), visceral adiposity index (VAI), lipid accumulation product (LAP) and cardiometabolic index (CMI) were compared between different Baveno groups (A - minor symptoms, minor comorbidities, B - severe symptoms, minor comorbidities, C - minor symptoms, severe comorbidities, D - severe symptoms, severe comorbidities). All composite lipid indices were higher in group D versus groups A and C. Only LAP (86.93 /58.40-119.49/ vs. 75.73 /48.37-99.04/) and CMI (1.03 /0.69-1.42/ vs. 0.91 /0.63-1.12/) were significantly different between the minimally symptomatic groups (C vs. A), and solely LAP was significantly higher (110.69 /76.76-147.22/ vs. 82.32 /60.35-113.50/) when the highly symptomatic groups (D vs. B) were compared. The Baveno classification correlates with cardiovascular risk estimated with composite lipid indices. Composite lipid indices may help better stratifying cardiovascular risk in both minimally- and highly symptomatic patients.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.