孤独症谱系障碍与社交焦虑的区别:大学生适应技能的探讨。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Gil Zukerman , Sigal Tikochinsky , Gili Yahav , Ester Ben-Itzchak
{"title":"孤独症谱系障碍与社交焦虑的区别:大学生适应技能的探讨。","authors":"Gil Zukerman ,&nbsp;Sigal Tikochinsky ,&nbsp;Gili Yahav ,&nbsp;Ester Ben-Itzchak","doi":"10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>High comorbidity and diagnostic overlap between autism spectrum disorder and social anxiety disorder have been documented. We examined if differences in adaptive behavior, essential for daily functioning, could differentiate these conditions among young university students. Eighty-eight autistic and 123 non-autistic undergraduates were categorized into four groups: autistic individuals: with low (<em>n</em> = 26)/high (<em>n</em> = 62) social anxiety (SA) symptoms; non-autistic: with low (<em>n</em> = 63)/high (<em>n</em> = 60) SA. The Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (ABAS) was utilized to assess three domains of adaptive skills essential for daily functioning: conceptual (academic and communication abilities), social (relationships and understanding social cues), and practical (everyday tasks such as self-care and work). Autistic students, regardless of SA level, reported ABAS scores within the low average range for the conceptual adaptive behavior domain, while non-autistic students had average scores. In terms of ABAS social adaptive behavior scores, both autistic and non-autistic groups with high levels of SA had low average scores. Conversely, those with low SA, whether autistic or non-autistic, exhibited average scores. These results were supported by the regression analyses outcomes. While autism traits and social anxiety showed medium (β=-0.37) and small (β=-0.27) effects, respectively, on conceptual adaptive scores, only social anxiety exhibited significant (medium) effects on social (β=-0.41) and practical (β=-0.34) adaptive scores. Reduced conceptual skills, previously linked to communication and executive function, may distinguish autism from social anxiety. Implications for research and practice are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20819,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Research","volume":"343 ","pages":"Article 116304"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinguishing autism spectrum disorder and social anxiety: Exploring adaptive skills among university students.\",\"authors\":\"Gil Zukerman ,&nbsp;Sigal Tikochinsky ,&nbsp;Gili Yahav ,&nbsp;Ester Ben-Itzchak\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>High comorbidity and diagnostic overlap between autism spectrum disorder and social anxiety disorder have been documented. We examined if differences in adaptive behavior, essential for daily functioning, could differentiate these conditions among young university students. Eighty-eight autistic and 123 non-autistic undergraduates were categorized into four groups: autistic individuals: with low (<em>n</em> = 26)/high (<em>n</em> = 62) social anxiety (SA) symptoms; non-autistic: with low (<em>n</em> = 63)/high (<em>n</em> = 60) SA. The Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (ABAS) was utilized to assess three domains of adaptive skills essential for daily functioning: conceptual (academic and communication abilities), social (relationships and understanding social cues), and practical (everyday tasks such as self-care and work). Autistic students, regardless of SA level, reported ABAS scores within the low average range for the conceptual adaptive behavior domain, while non-autistic students had average scores. In terms of ABAS social adaptive behavior scores, both autistic and non-autistic groups with high levels of SA had low average scores. Conversely, those with low SA, whether autistic or non-autistic, exhibited average scores. These results were supported by the regression analyses outcomes. While autism traits and social anxiety showed medium (β=-0.37) and small (β=-0.27) effects, respectively, on conceptual adaptive scores, only social anxiety exhibited significant (medium) effects on social (β=-0.41) and practical (β=-0.34) adaptive scores. Reduced conceptual skills, previously linked to communication and executive function, may distinguish autism from social anxiety. Implications for research and practice are discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry Research\",\"volume\":\"343 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165178124005894\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165178124005894","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自闭症谱系障碍和社交焦虑障碍之间的高合并症和诊断重叠已被证明。我们研究了对日常功能至关重要的适应行为的差异是否可以区分年轻大学生的这些情况。88名自闭症大学生和123名非自闭症大学生被分为四组:自闭症个体:有低(n = 26)/高(n = 62)社交焦虑症状;非自闭症:低SA (n = 63)/高SA (n = 60)。适应性行为评估系统(ABAS)用于评估日常功能中必不可少的三个适应技能领域:概念(学术和沟通能力),社会(关系和理解社会线索)和实践(日常任务,如自我照顾和工作)。自闭症学生在概念适应行为领域的得分处于低平均范围内,而非自闭症学生在概念适应行为领域的得分处于平均水平。在ABAS社会适应行为得分方面,高SA水平的自闭症组和非自闭症组的平均得分都较低。相反,那些低SA的人,无论是自闭症还是非自闭症,都表现出平均得分。这些结果得到回归分析结果的支持。自闭症特征和社交焦虑对概念适应得分的影响分别为中等(β=-0.37)和小(β=-0.27),只有社交焦虑对社会适应得分(β=-0.41)和实际适应得分(β=-0.34)有显著(中等)影响。先前与沟通和执行功能有关的概念能力下降,可能将自闭症与社交焦虑区分开来。讨论了对研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distinguishing autism spectrum disorder and social anxiety: Exploring adaptive skills among university students.
High comorbidity and diagnostic overlap between autism spectrum disorder and social anxiety disorder have been documented. We examined if differences in adaptive behavior, essential for daily functioning, could differentiate these conditions among young university students. Eighty-eight autistic and 123 non-autistic undergraduates were categorized into four groups: autistic individuals: with low (n = 26)/high (n = 62) social anxiety (SA) symptoms; non-autistic: with low (n = 63)/high (n = 60) SA. The Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (ABAS) was utilized to assess three domains of adaptive skills essential for daily functioning: conceptual (academic and communication abilities), social (relationships and understanding social cues), and practical (everyday tasks such as self-care and work). Autistic students, regardless of SA level, reported ABAS scores within the low average range for the conceptual adaptive behavior domain, while non-autistic students had average scores. In terms of ABAS social adaptive behavior scores, both autistic and non-autistic groups with high levels of SA had low average scores. Conversely, those with low SA, whether autistic or non-autistic, exhibited average scores. These results were supported by the regression analyses outcomes. While autism traits and social anxiety showed medium (β=-0.37) and small (β=-0.27) effects, respectively, on conceptual adaptive scores, only social anxiety exhibited significant (medium) effects on social (β=-0.41) and practical (β=-0.34) adaptive scores. Reduced conceptual skills, previously linked to communication and executive function, may distinguish autism from social anxiety. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatry Research
Psychiatry Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
527
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Psychiatry Research offers swift publication of comprehensive research reports and reviews within the field of psychiatry. The scope of the journal encompasses: Biochemical, physiological, neuroanatomic, genetic, neurocognitive, and psychosocial determinants of psychiatric disorders. Diagnostic assessments of psychiatric disorders. Evaluations that pursue hypotheses about the cause or causes of psychiatric diseases. Evaluations of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic psychiatric treatments. Basic neuroscience studies related to animal or neurochemical models for psychiatric disorders. Methodological advances, such as instrumentation, clinical scales, and assays directly applicable to psychiatric research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信