低强度光治疗和强脉冲光治疗睑板腺功能障碍。系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Kai En Chan, Beth Shin Rei Lau, Blanche Xiao Hong Lim, Ruochen Du, Giuseppe Giannaccare, Louis Tong, Fiona Stapleton, Chris Hong Long Lim
{"title":"低强度光治疗和强脉冲光治疗睑板腺功能障碍。系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Kai En Chan, Beth Shin Rei Lau, Blanche Xiao Hong Lim, Ruochen Du, Giuseppe Giannaccare, Louis Tong, Fiona Stapleton, Chris Hong Long Lim","doi":"10.1016/j.clae.2024.102344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is a leading cause of dry eye disease, affecting over a third of the global population. This disease is associated with ocular discomfort, reduced visual quality, and quality of life. Novel treatments like Intense Pulse Light (IPL) therapy and Low-Level Light Therapy (LLLT) have been reported to be useful in refractory MGD treatment. However, no systematic review has explored the utility of combining these two therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched for articles on LLLT + IPL therapy in MGD. A meta-analysis of single means was conducted to assess clinical endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 12 studies showed that LLLT + IPL therapy in MGD patients led to a significant decrease in Ocular Surface Disease Index score (MD: -22.8, 95 %CI: -29.1 to -16.5, I<sup>2</sup> = 97.5 %, p < 0.001), and a significant increase in both Tear Break-up Time (MD: 2.2 s, 95 %CI: 0.9 s to 3.4 s, I<sup>2</sup> = 98.6 %, p < 0.001) and Schirmer test (MD: 1.5 mm, 95 %CI: 0.6 mm to 2.5 mm, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0 %, p = 0.001) at ≤ 3 months post treatment. These improvements were sustained in a sensitivity analysis at endpoints ≥ 6 months post treatment. While the percentage of loss of meibomian gland area (n = 4, MD: -3.8 %, 95 %CI: -7.2 % to -0.4 %, I<sup>2</sup> = 40.0 %, p = 0.031) was reported to be significantly reduced, this was not found to be sustained at endpoints ≥ 6 months post treatment (n = 2, MD: 5.9 %, 95 %CI: 1.8 % to 10.0 %, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0 %, p = 0.005) in two studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis provides quantitative evidence supporting the clinical efficacy of LLLT + IPL therapy in MGD. Future research should evaluate its long-term safety and efficacy and compare it with alternative treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":49087,"journal":{"name":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","volume":" ","pages":"102344"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-level light therapy and intense pulse light therapy in meibomian gland dysfunction. A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kai En Chan, Beth Shin Rei Lau, Blanche Xiao Hong Lim, Ruochen Du, Giuseppe Giannaccare, Louis Tong, Fiona Stapleton, Chris Hong Long Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clae.2024.102344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is a leading cause of dry eye disease, affecting over a third of the global population. This disease is associated with ocular discomfort, reduced visual quality, and quality of life. Novel treatments like Intense Pulse Light (IPL) therapy and Low-Level Light Therapy (LLLT) have been reported to be useful in refractory MGD treatment. However, no systematic review has explored the utility of combining these two therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched for articles on LLLT + IPL therapy in MGD. A meta-analysis of single means was conducted to assess clinical endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 12 studies showed that LLLT + IPL therapy in MGD patients led to a significant decrease in Ocular Surface Disease Index score (MD: -22.8, 95 %CI: -29.1 to -16.5, I<sup>2</sup> = 97.5 %, p < 0.001), and a significant increase in both Tear Break-up Time (MD: 2.2 s, 95 %CI: 0.9 s to 3.4 s, I<sup>2</sup> = 98.6 %, p < 0.001) and Schirmer test (MD: 1.5 mm, 95 %CI: 0.6 mm to 2.5 mm, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0 %, p = 0.001) at ≤ 3 months post treatment. These improvements were sustained in a sensitivity analysis at endpoints ≥ 6 months post treatment. While the percentage of loss of meibomian gland area (n = 4, MD: -3.8 %, 95 %CI: -7.2 % to -0.4 %, I<sup>2</sup> = 40.0 %, p = 0.031) was reported to be significantly reduced, this was not found to be sustained at endpoints ≥ 6 months post treatment (n = 2, MD: 5.9 %, 95 %CI: 1.8 % to 10.0 %, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0 %, p = 0.005) in two studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis provides quantitative evidence supporting the clinical efficacy of LLLT + IPL therapy in MGD. Future research should evaluate its long-term safety and efficacy and compare it with alternative treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2024.102344\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2024.102344","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)是干眼病的主要原因,影响全球三分之一以上的人口。此病与眼部不适、视觉质量下降和生活质量有关。据报道,强脉冲光(IPL)疗法和低水平光疗法(LLLT)等新疗法可用于难治性MGD的治疗。然而,尚无系统综述探讨这两种疗法联合使用的效果。方法:检索Medline、Embase和CENTRAL数据库中有关LLLT + IPL治疗MGD的文章。采用单手段进行荟萃分析以评估临床终点。结果:12项研究分析显示,在MGD患者治疗后≤3个月,LLLT + IPL治疗可显著降低眼表疾病指数评分(MD: -22.8, 95% CI: -29.1 ~ -16.5, I2 = 97.5%, p 2 = 98.6%, p 2 = 0.0%, p = 0.001)。在治疗后≥6个月的终点,这些改善在敏感性分析中得以持续。虽然睑板腺面积损失的百分比(n = 4, MD: - 3.8%, 95% CI: - 7.2%至- 0.4%,I2 = 40.0%, p = 0.031)被报道显着减少,但在两项研究中,在治疗后≥6个月的终点(n = 2, MD: 5.9%, 95% CI: 1.8%至10.0%,I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.005)未发现这种情况持续。结论:本荟萃分析为支持LLLT + IPL治疗MGD的临床疗效提供了定量证据。未来的研究应评估其长期安全性和有效性,并与其他治疗方法进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Low-level light therapy and intense pulse light therapy in meibomian gland dysfunction. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is a leading cause of dry eye disease, affecting over a third of the global population. This disease is associated with ocular discomfort, reduced visual quality, and quality of life. Novel treatments like Intense Pulse Light (IPL) therapy and Low-Level Light Therapy (LLLT) have been reported to be useful in refractory MGD treatment. However, no systematic review has explored the utility of combining these two therapies.

Methods: Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched for articles on LLLT + IPL therapy in MGD. A meta-analysis of single means was conducted to assess clinical endpoints.

Results: Analysis of 12 studies showed that LLLT + IPL therapy in MGD patients led to a significant decrease in Ocular Surface Disease Index score (MD: -22.8, 95 %CI: -29.1 to -16.5, I2 = 97.5 %, p < 0.001), and a significant increase in both Tear Break-up Time (MD: 2.2 s, 95 %CI: 0.9 s to 3.4 s, I2 = 98.6 %, p < 0.001) and Schirmer test (MD: 1.5 mm, 95 %CI: 0.6 mm to 2.5 mm, I2 = 0.0 %, p = 0.001) at ≤ 3 months post treatment. These improvements were sustained in a sensitivity analysis at endpoints ≥ 6 months post treatment. While the percentage of loss of meibomian gland area (n = 4, MD: -3.8 %, 95 %CI: -7.2 % to -0.4 %, I2 = 40.0 %, p = 0.031) was reported to be significantly reduced, this was not found to be sustained at endpoints ≥ 6 months post treatment (n = 2, MD: 5.9 %, 95 %CI: 1.8 % to 10.0 %, I2 = 0.0 %, p = 0.005) in two studies.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis provides quantitative evidence supporting the clinical efficacy of LLLT + IPL therapy in MGD. Future research should evaluate its long-term safety and efficacy and compare it with alternative treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
198
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Contact Lens & Anterior Eye is a research-based journal covering all aspects of contact lens theory and practice, including original articles on invention and innovations, as well as the regular features of: Case Reports; Literary Reviews; Editorials; Instrumentation and Techniques and Dates of Professional Meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信