广角数字乳房断层合成系统中飞行焦斑技术的评价。

IF 1.9 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1117/1.JMI.12.S1.S13009
Katrien Houbrechts, Nicholas Marshall, Lesley Cockmartin, Hilde Bosmans
{"title":"广角数字乳房断层合成系统中飞行焦斑技术的评价。","authors":"Katrien Houbrechts, Nicholas Marshall, Lesley Cockmartin, Hilde Bosmans","doi":"10.1117/1.JMI.12.S1.S13009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We characterize the flying focal spot (FFS) technology in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), designed to overcome source motion blurring.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>A wide-angle DBT system with continuous gantry and focus motion (\"uncompensated focus\") and a system with FFS were compared for image sharpness and lesion detectability. The modulation transfer function (MTF) was assessed as a function of height in the projections and reconstructed images, along with lesion detectability using the contrast detail phantom for mammography (CDMAM) and the L1 phantom.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the uncompensated focus system, the spatial frequency for 25% MTF value ( <math> <mrow><msub><mi>f</mi> <mrow><mn>25</mn> <mo>%</mo></mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math> ) measured at 2, 4, and 6 cm in DBT projections fell by 35%, 49%, and 59%, respectively in the tube-travel direction compared with the FFS system. There was no significant difference in <math> <mrow><msub><mi>f</mi> <mrow><mn>25</mn> <mo>%</mo></mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math> for the front-back and tube-travel directions for the FFS unit. The in-plane MTF in the tube-travel direction also improved with the FFS technology.The threshold gold thickness ( <math> <mrow><msub><mi>T</mi> <mi>t</mi></msub> </mrow> </math> ) for the 0.16-mm diameter discs of contrast detail phantom for mammography (CDMAM) improved for the FFS system in DBT mode, especially at greater heights above the table; <math> <mrow><msub><mi>T</mi> <mi>t</mi></msub> </mrow> </math> at 45 and 65 mm improved by 16% and 24%, respectively, compared with the uncompensated focus system. In addition, improvements in calcification and mass detection in a structured background were observed for DBT and synthetic mammography. The FFS system demonstrated faster scan times (4.8 s versus 21.7 s), potentially reducing patient motion artifacts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FFS technology offers isotropic resolution, improved small detail detectability, and faster scan times in DBT mode compared with the traditional continuous gantry and focus motion approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":47707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging","volume":"12 Suppl 1","pages":"S13009"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the flying focal spot technology in a wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis system.\",\"authors\":\"Katrien Houbrechts, Nicholas Marshall, Lesley Cockmartin, Hilde Bosmans\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/1.JMI.12.S1.S13009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We characterize the flying focal spot (FFS) technology in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), designed to overcome source motion blurring.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>A wide-angle DBT system with continuous gantry and focus motion (\\\"uncompensated focus\\\") and a system with FFS were compared for image sharpness and lesion detectability. The modulation transfer function (MTF) was assessed as a function of height in the projections and reconstructed images, along with lesion detectability using the contrast detail phantom for mammography (CDMAM) and the L1 phantom.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the uncompensated focus system, the spatial frequency for 25% MTF value ( <math> <mrow><msub><mi>f</mi> <mrow><mn>25</mn> <mo>%</mo></mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math> ) measured at 2, 4, and 6 cm in DBT projections fell by 35%, 49%, and 59%, respectively in the tube-travel direction compared with the FFS system. There was no significant difference in <math> <mrow><msub><mi>f</mi> <mrow><mn>25</mn> <mo>%</mo></mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math> for the front-back and tube-travel directions for the FFS unit. The in-plane MTF in the tube-travel direction also improved with the FFS technology.The threshold gold thickness ( <math> <mrow><msub><mi>T</mi> <mi>t</mi></msub> </mrow> </math> ) for the 0.16-mm diameter discs of contrast detail phantom for mammography (CDMAM) improved for the FFS system in DBT mode, especially at greater heights above the table; <math> <mrow><msub><mi>T</mi> <mi>t</mi></msub> </mrow> </math> at 45 and 65 mm improved by 16% and 24%, respectively, compared with the uncompensated focus system. In addition, improvements in calcification and mass detection in a structured background were observed for DBT and synthetic mammography. The FFS system demonstrated faster scan times (4.8 s versus 21.7 s), potentially reducing patient motion artifacts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FFS technology offers isotropic resolution, improved small detail detectability, and faster scan times in DBT mode compared with the traditional continuous gantry and focus motion approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"12 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"S13009\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616485/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.12.S1.S13009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.12.S1.S13009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们描述了数字乳房断层合成(DBT)中的飞行焦点(FFS)技术,旨在克服源运动模糊。方法:将具有连续龙门和焦点运动(“无补偿焦点”)的广角DBT系统与具有FFS的系统进行图像清晰度和病变可检测性的比较。调制传递函数(MTF)作为投影和重建图像中高度的函数进行评估,同时使用乳腺x线造影对比度细节幻像(CDMAM)和L1幻像评估病变可检测性。结果:对于无补偿聚焦系统,与FFS系统相比,DBT投影在2、4和6 cm处测量的25% MTF值(f 25%)的空间频率在管行程方向上分别下降了35%、49%和59%。在FFS装置的前后和管行方向上,没有25%的显著差异。采用FFS技术后,管行程方向的面内MTF也得到了改善。在DBT模式下,FFS系统中直径0.16 mm的乳腺造影对比度细节幻影(CDMAM)盘的阈值金厚度(T T)有所提高,特别是在表上方较高的高度;与无补偿对焦系统相比,45和65 mm处的焦距分别提高了16%和24%。此外,观察到DBT和合成乳房x线摄影在结构化背景下钙化和肿块检测方面的改善。FFS系统显示出更快的扫描时间(4.8秒比21.7秒),潜在地减少了患者的运动伪影。结论:与传统的连续龙门和聚焦运动方法相比,FFS技术在DBT模式下提供了各向同性分辨率,提高了小细节检测能力,并且更快的扫描时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the flying focal spot technology in a wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis system.

Purpose: We characterize the flying focal spot (FFS) technology in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), designed to overcome source motion blurring.

Approach: A wide-angle DBT system with continuous gantry and focus motion ("uncompensated focus") and a system with FFS were compared for image sharpness and lesion detectability. The modulation transfer function (MTF) was assessed as a function of height in the projections and reconstructed images, along with lesion detectability using the contrast detail phantom for mammography (CDMAM) and the L1 phantom.

Results: For the uncompensated focus system, the spatial frequency for 25% MTF value ( f 25 % ) measured at 2, 4, and 6 cm in DBT projections fell by 35%, 49%, and 59%, respectively in the tube-travel direction compared with the FFS system. There was no significant difference in f 25 % for the front-back and tube-travel directions for the FFS unit. The in-plane MTF in the tube-travel direction also improved with the FFS technology.The threshold gold thickness ( T t ) for the 0.16-mm diameter discs of contrast detail phantom for mammography (CDMAM) improved for the FFS system in DBT mode, especially at greater heights above the table; T t at 45 and 65 mm improved by 16% and 24%, respectively, compared with the uncompensated focus system. In addition, improvements in calcification and mass detection in a structured background were observed for DBT and synthetic mammography. The FFS system demonstrated faster scan times (4.8 s versus 21.7 s), potentially reducing patient motion artifacts.

Conclusions: The FFS technology offers isotropic resolution, improved small detail detectability, and faster scan times in DBT mode compared with the traditional continuous gantry and focus motion approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Imaging
Journal of Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JMI covers fundamental and translational research, as well as applications, focused on medical imaging, which continue to yield physical and biomedical advancements in the early detection, diagnostics, and therapy of disease as well as in the understanding of normal. The scope of JMI includes: Imaging physics, Tomographic reconstruction algorithms (such as those in CT and MRI), Image processing and deep learning, Computer-aided diagnosis and quantitative image analysis, Visualization and modeling, Picture archiving and communications systems (PACS), Image perception and observer performance, Technology assessment, Ultrasonic imaging, Image-guided procedures, Digital pathology, Biomedical applications of biomedical imaging. JMI allows for the peer-reviewed communication and archiving of scientific developments, translational and clinical applications, reviews, and recommendations for the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信