使用SKILLCOURT技术调节成人运动认知训练中的体育锻炼强度。

IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Gülsa Erdogan, Bettina Karsten, Lutz Vogt, Andreas Mierau, Thorben Hülsdünker
{"title":"使用SKILLCOURT技术调节成人运动认知训练中的体育锻炼强度。","authors":"Gülsa Erdogan, Bettina Karsten, Lutz Vogt, Andreas Mierau, Thorben Hülsdünker","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Motor-cognitive training and exergaming often only reach low-to-medium intensities that limits their training efficiency. This study evaluated the physiological profile of different exercises on a novel motor-cognitive training technology designed to cover a broad range of exercise intensities. Twenty-six healthy trained adults (17 males, 23.7 ± 3.8 years) performed five motor-cognitive training tasks on the SKILLCOURT technology. Oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2</sub>), heart rate (HR), blood [lactate], perceived physical exertion (RPE) responses, and metabolic equivalent (MET) were assessed and compared to an incremental treadmill ramp test determining the maximal oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2max</sub>) and maximal heart rate (HR<sub>max</sub>). Computer-based cognitive training served as control condition. Motor-cognitive exercises reached a higher %VO<sub>2max</sub> and %HR<sub>max</sub> levels when compared to computer-based training (p < 0.001). Average intensity varied significantly between motor-cognitive tasks, with %VO<sub>2max</sub> ranging from 22% to 81% (p < 0.001), %HR<sub>max</sub> from 49% to 89% (p < 0.001), METs from 3.57 to 13.37 (p < 0.001), blood [lactate] from 0.93 to 7.81 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup> (p < 0.001), and RPE from 8.5 to 16.4 (p < 0.001). Motor-cognitive training covers a wide range of exercise intensities. This supports individual training subscription and allows high-intensity training to facilitate cardio-vascular adaptations and neural plasticity.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"12 23","pages":"e70136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11620832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modulation of physical exercise intensity in motor-cognitive training of adults using the SKILLCOURT technology.\",\"authors\":\"Gülsa Erdogan, Bettina Karsten, Lutz Vogt, Andreas Mierau, Thorben Hülsdünker\",\"doi\":\"10.14814/phy2.70136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Motor-cognitive training and exergaming often only reach low-to-medium intensities that limits their training efficiency. This study evaluated the physiological profile of different exercises on a novel motor-cognitive training technology designed to cover a broad range of exercise intensities. Twenty-six healthy trained adults (17 males, 23.7 ± 3.8 years) performed five motor-cognitive training tasks on the SKILLCOURT technology. Oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2</sub>), heart rate (HR), blood [lactate], perceived physical exertion (RPE) responses, and metabolic equivalent (MET) were assessed and compared to an incremental treadmill ramp test determining the maximal oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2max</sub>) and maximal heart rate (HR<sub>max</sub>). Computer-based cognitive training served as control condition. Motor-cognitive exercises reached a higher %VO<sub>2max</sub> and %HR<sub>max</sub> levels when compared to computer-based training (p < 0.001). Average intensity varied significantly between motor-cognitive tasks, with %VO<sub>2max</sub> ranging from 22% to 81% (p < 0.001), %HR<sub>max</sub> from 49% to 89% (p < 0.001), METs from 3.57 to 13.37 (p < 0.001), blood [lactate] from 0.93 to 7.81 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup> (p < 0.001), and RPE from 8.5 to 16.4 (p < 0.001). Motor-cognitive training covers a wide range of exercise intensities. This supports individual training subscription and allows high-intensity training to facilitate cardio-vascular adaptations and neural plasticity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"volume\":\"12 23\",\"pages\":\"e70136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11620832/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

运动认知训练和运动训练通常只能达到低到中等强度,这限制了他们的训练效率。本研究评估了一种新的运动-认知训练技术的不同运动的生理特征,该技术旨在涵盖广泛的运动强度。26名健康成人(17名男性,23.7±3.8岁)在SKILLCOURT技术上完成了5项运动认知训练任务。评估耗氧量(VO2)、心率(HR)、血[乳酸]、感知体力消耗(RPE)反应和代谢当量(MET),并与确定最大耗氧量(VO2max)和最大心率(HRmax)的增量跑步机斜坡试验进行比较。计算机认知训练作为对照条件。与基于计算机的训练相比,运动认知训练达到了更高的%VO2max和%HRmax水平(p 2max从22%到81% (p max从49%到89% (p -1))
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modulation of physical exercise intensity in motor-cognitive training of adults using the SKILLCOURT technology.

Motor-cognitive training and exergaming often only reach low-to-medium intensities that limits their training efficiency. This study evaluated the physiological profile of different exercises on a novel motor-cognitive training technology designed to cover a broad range of exercise intensities. Twenty-six healthy trained adults (17 males, 23.7 ± 3.8 years) performed five motor-cognitive training tasks on the SKILLCOURT technology. Oxygen consumption (VO2), heart rate (HR), blood [lactate], perceived physical exertion (RPE) responses, and metabolic equivalent (MET) were assessed and compared to an incremental treadmill ramp test determining the maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) and maximal heart rate (HRmax). Computer-based cognitive training served as control condition. Motor-cognitive exercises reached a higher %VO2max and %HRmax levels when compared to computer-based training (p < 0.001). Average intensity varied significantly between motor-cognitive tasks, with %VO2max ranging from 22% to 81% (p < 0.001), %HRmax from 49% to 89% (p < 0.001), METs from 3.57 to 13.37 (p < 0.001), blood [lactate] from 0.93 to 7.81 mmol·L-1 (p < 0.001), and RPE from 8.5 to 16.4 (p < 0.001). Motor-cognitive training covers a wide range of exercise intensities. This supports individual training subscription and allows high-intensity training to facilitate cardio-vascular adaptations and neural plasticity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信