Weijie Ma, Li Gao, Xinya Wu, Lei Zhong, Xun Huang, Rui Yang, Hanxin Wu, Liangyu Zhu, Weijiang Ma, Li Peng, Bingxue Li, Jieqin Song, Suyi Luo, Fukai Bao, Aihua Liu
{"title":"全球流行的伯氏疏螺旋体和嗜吞噬细胞无原体在野生和家养动物的共同感染:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Weijie Ma, Li Gao, Xinya Wu, Lei Zhong, Xun Huang, Rui Yang, Hanxin Wu, Liangyu Zhu, Weijiang Ma, Li Peng, Bingxue Li, Jieqin Song, Suyi Luo, Fukai Bao, Aihua Liu","doi":"10.7189/jogh.14.04231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) and Anaplasma phagocytophilum (Ap) can infect humans and animals through tick-borne transmission, resulting in zoonosis. Under certain conditions, human infection can lead to Lyme disease (LD) and human granulocytosis (HGA), whereas infection in animals can cause various acute and non-specific symptoms. The combination of Bb and Ap has been reported to increase the disease severity in infected animals. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated the global diversity of Bb and Ap coinfection in animals and their prevalence and distribution regarding spatial and species ecoepidemiology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for original studies on Bb and Ap coinfection. We assessed the rate of Bb and Ap in all included articles by single-group meta-analysis and subgroup analyses. We evaluated publication bias using a combination of funnel plots, Egger's tests, and Begg's tests, and conducted risk of bias assessment using the SYRCLE tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search retrieved 40 articles, with eight involving 8419 infected animals meeting our inclusion criteria. The SYRCLE bias risk assessment indicated that most of the included studies were of high quality. Forest maps showed that the combined Bb and Ap infection rate in animals worldwide was 5.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.4-9.6). Subgroup analysis of forest maps showed that the coinfection rates were 8.2% (95% CI = 2.2-17.2) in North American, 0.2% (95% CI = 0.1-0.7) in European, and 1.2% (95% CI = 0.8-1.8) in Asian animals. Coinfection rates were 6.7% (95% CI = 2.7-12.2) in domestic and 0.0% (95% CI = 0.0-0.4) in wild animals. The coinfection rates were 9% (95% CI = 5.7-12.8) in domestic horses and 6% (95% CI = 1.9-12.2) in domestic dogs, whereas 7.5% (95% CI = 3-17.9) in wild squirrels and 0.2% (95% CI = 0.1-0.7) in wild mice. Funnel diagrams, Egger's tests, and Begg's tests showed no significant publication bias in the included studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Spatial epidemiology showed that coinfection with Bb and Ap in animals worldwide was most prevalent in the southwestern region of North America, whereas species epidemiology showed that coinfection was most prevalent in domesticated horses, followed by wild squirrels and domesticated dogs, but was less common in wild mice. These data on the epidemiological status of Bb and Ap coinfection in animals may help guide the prevention and treatment of zoonosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"14 ","pages":"04231"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622344/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi and Anaplasma phagocytophilum coinfection in wild and domesticated animals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Weijie Ma, Li Gao, Xinya Wu, Lei Zhong, Xun Huang, Rui Yang, Hanxin Wu, Liangyu Zhu, Weijiang Ma, Li Peng, Bingxue Li, Jieqin Song, Suyi Luo, Fukai Bao, Aihua Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.7189/jogh.14.04231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) and Anaplasma phagocytophilum (Ap) can infect humans and animals through tick-borne transmission, resulting in zoonosis. Under certain conditions, human infection can lead to Lyme disease (LD) and human granulocytosis (HGA), whereas infection in animals can cause various acute and non-specific symptoms. The combination of Bb and Ap has been reported to increase the disease severity in infected animals. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated the global diversity of Bb and Ap coinfection in animals and their prevalence and distribution regarding spatial and species ecoepidemiology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for original studies on Bb and Ap coinfection. We assessed the rate of Bb and Ap in all included articles by single-group meta-analysis and subgroup analyses. We evaluated publication bias using a combination of funnel plots, Egger's tests, and Begg's tests, and conducted risk of bias assessment using the SYRCLE tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search retrieved 40 articles, with eight involving 8419 infected animals meeting our inclusion criteria. The SYRCLE bias risk assessment indicated that most of the included studies were of high quality. Forest maps showed that the combined Bb and Ap infection rate in animals worldwide was 5.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.4-9.6). Subgroup analysis of forest maps showed that the coinfection rates were 8.2% (95% CI = 2.2-17.2) in North American, 0.2% (95% CI = 0.1-0.7) in European, and 1.2% (95% CI = 0.8-1.8) in Asian animals. Coinfection rates were 6.7% (95% CI = 2.7-12.2) in domestic and 0.0% (95% CI = 0.0-0.4) in wild animals. The coinfection rates were 9% (95% CI = 5.7-12.8) in domestic horses and 6% (95% CI = 1.9-12.2) in domestic dogs, whereas 7.5% (95% CI = 3-17.9) in wild squirrels and 0.2% (95% CI = 0.1-0.7) in wild mice. Funnel diagrams, Egger's tests, and Begg's tests showed no significant publication bias in the included studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Spatial epidemiology showed that coinfection with Bb and Ap in animals worldwide was most prevalent in the southwestern region of North America, whereas species epidemiology showed that coinfection was most prevalent in domesticated horses, followed by wild squirrels and domesticated dogs, but was less common in wild mice. These data on the epidemiological status of Bb and Ap coinfection in animals may help guide the prevention and treatment of zoonosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"04231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622344/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.04231\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.04231","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:伯氏疏螺旋体(Bb)和嗜吞噬细胞无原体(Ap)均可通过蜱传感染人和动物,引起人畜共患病。在某些情况下,人感染可导致莱姆病(LD)和人粒细胞缺乏症(HGA),而动物感染可引起各种急性和非特异性症状。据报道,Bb和Ap的结合可增加受感染动物的疾病严重程度。通过系统综述和荟萃分析,从空间和物种生态流行病学角度研究了全球动物乙型肝炎和乙型肝炎共感染的多样性及其流行和分布。方法:我们查询PubMed、Web of Science、Embase和Cochrane图书馆关于乙型肝炎和乙型肝炎合并感染的原始研究。我们通过单组荟萃分析和亚组分析评估所有纳入文章的Bb和Ap率。我们综合使用漏斗图、Egger检验和Begg检验来评估发表偏倚,并使用sycle工具进行偏倚风险评估。结果:我们检索到40篇文章,其中8篇涉及8419只感染动物符合我们的纳入标准。sycle偏倚风险评估显示,大多数纳入的研究都是高质量的。森林地图显示,全世界动物的Bb和Ap联合感染率为5.5%(95%可信区间(CI) = 2.4-9.6)。森林图亚组分析显示,北美动物共感染率为8.2% (95% CI = 2.2 ~ 17.2),欧洲动物共感染率为0.2% (95% CI = 0.1 ~ 0.7),亚洲动物共感染率为1.2% (95% CI = 0.8 ~ 1.8)。家养动物共感染率为6.7% (95% CI = 2.7 ~ 12.2),野生动物共感染率为0.0% (95% CI = 0.0 ~ 0.4)。家马共感染率为9% (95% CI = 5.7 ~ 12.8),家犬共感染率为6% (95% CI = 1.9 ~ 12.2),野生松鼠共感染率为7.5% (95% CI = 3 ~ 17.9),野生小鼠共感染率为0.2% (95% CI = 0.1 ~ 0.7)。漏斗图、Egger’s检验和Begg’s检验显示纳入的研究中没有显著的发表偏倚。结论:空间流行病学结果表明,全球动物Bb和Ap共感染以北美西南地区最为普遍;物种流行病学结果表明,共感染以驯养马最为普遍,其次为野生松鼠和家犬,而在野生小鼠中较少见。动物乙型肝炎和甲型肝炎合并感染的流行病学现状,对人畜共患病的预防和治疗具有指导意义。
Global prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi and Anaplasma phagocytophilum coinfection in wild and domesticated animals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Both Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) and Anaplasma phagocytophilum (Ap) can infect humans and animals through tick-borne transmission, resulting in zoonosis. Under certain conditions, human infection can lead to Lyme disease (LD) and human granulocytosis (HGA), whereas infection in animals can cause various acute and non-specific symptoms. The combination of Bb and Ap has been reported to increase the disease severity in infected animals. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated the global diversity of Bb and Ap coinfection in animals and their prevalence and distribution regarding spatial and species ecoepidemiology.
Methods: We queried PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for original studies on Bb and Ap coinfection. We assessed the rate of Bb and Ap in all included articles by single-group meta-analysis and subgroup analyses. We evaluated publication bias using a combination of funnel plots, Egger's tests, and Begg's tests, and conducted risk of bias assessment using the SYRCLE tool.
Results: Our search retrieved 40 articles, with eight involving 8419 infected animals meeting our inclusion criteria. The SYRCLE bias risk assessment indicated that most of the included studies were of high quality. Forest maps showed that the combined Bb and Ap infection rate in animals worldwide was 5.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.4-9.6). Subgroup analysis of forest maps showed that the coinfection rates were 8.2% (95% CI = 2.2-17.2) in North American, 0.2% (95% CI = 0.1-0.7) in European, and 1.2% (95% CI = 0.8-1.8) in Asian animals. Coinfection rates were 6.7% (95% CI = 2.7-12.2) in domestic and 0.0% (95% CI = 0.0-0.4) in wild animals. The coinfection rates were 9% (95% CI = 5.7-12.8) in domestic horses and 6% (95% CI = 1.9-12.2) in domestic dogs, whereas 7.5% (95% CI = 3-17.9) in wild squirrels and 0.2% (95% CI = 0.1-0.7) in wild mice. Funnel diagrams, Egger's tests, and Begg's tests showed no significant publication bias in the included studies.
Conclusions: Spatial epidemiology showed that coinfection with Bb and Ap in animals worldwide was most prevalent in the southwestern region of North America, whereas species epidemiology showed that coinfection was most prevalent in domesticated horses, followed by wild squirrels and domesticated dogs, but was less common in wild mice. These data on the epidemiological status of Bb and Ap coinfection in animals may help guide the prevention and treatment of zoonosis.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.