{"title":"COVID-19疫苗有效性和疫苗接种障碍:基于疫苗接种状况的认知比较","authors":"Saskia Shuman, Timnit Berhane, Devin Madden, Rita Larson, Ariel Jacobs, Jacqueline Chiofalo, Nita Vangeepuram","doi":"10.1007/s40615-024-02243-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>New York City (NYC) was the first epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA. Despite the availability of COVID-19 vaccines by 2021, vaccination rates varied among racial and ethnic groups, further exacerbating COVID-19-related health disparities. This study explores the relationship between vaccination status and perspectives on COVID-19-related topics among racially and ethnically diverse NYC residents. The New York Community Engagement Alliance Against COVID-19 Disparities (NYCEAL) conducted focus groups with NYC residents to explore their perceptions about vaccine effectiveness and barriers to vaccination that may impact vaccine decision-making. We conducted seven focus groups between December 2021 and April 2022 in English and Spanish with individuals grouped based on vaccination status: (1) those vaccinated when vaccines first became available, (2) those vaccinated after mandates were announced, and (3) those who remained unvaccinated. Transcripts were initially analyzed using a priori and in vivo codes, and the team utilized framework analysis to examine similarities and differences across groups. Emerging themes centered on trust in science, perceived vaccine effectiveness, and the evolution of people's COVID-19-related perspectives, experiences, and behaviors over time. Although there were distinctions between groups on concepts like trust in science and perceived vaccine effectiveness, people's cognitive biases seemed to affect their perceptions but not necessarily their (vaccine-related) behaviors. Findings from this study may help public health professionals understand vaccine decision-making from the perspective of a diverse set of New Yorkers for use during future epidemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness and Barriers to Vaccination: Comparing Perceptions Based on Vaccination Status.\",\"authors\":\"Saskia Shuman, Timnit Berhane, Devin Madden, Rita Larson, Ariel Jacobs, Jacqueline Chiofalo, Nita Vangeepuram\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40615-024-02243-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>New York City (NYC) was the first epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA. Despite the availability of COVID-19 vaccines by 2021, vaccination rates varied among racial and ethnic groups, further exacerbating COVID-19-related health disparities. This study explores the relationship between vaccination status and perspectives on COVID-19-related topics among racially and ethnically diverse NYC residents. The New York Community Engagement Alliance Against COVID-19 Disparities (NYCEAL) conducted focus groups with NYC residents to explore their perceptions about vaccine effectiveness and barriers to vaccination that may impact vaccine decision-making. We conducted seven focus groups between December 2021 and April 2022 in English and Spanish with individuals grouped based on vaccination status: (1) those vaccinated when vaccines first became available, (2) those vaccinated after mandates were announced, and (3) those who remained unvaccinated. Transcripts were initially analyzed using a priori and in vivo codes, and the team utilized framework analysis to examine similarities and differences across groups. Emerging themes centered on trust in science, perceived vaccine effectiveness, and the evolution of people's COVID-19-related perspectives, experiences, and behaviors over time. Although there were distinctions between groups on concepts like trust in science and perceived vaccine effectiveness, people's cognitive biases seemed to affect their perceptions but not necessarily their (vaccine-related) behaviors. Findings from this study may help public health professionals understand vaccine decision-making from the perspective of a diverse set of New Yorkers for use during future epidemics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02243-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02243-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness and Barriers to Vaccination: Comparing Perceptions Based on Vaccination Status.
New York City (NYC) was the first epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA. Despite the availability of COVID-19 vaccines by 2021, vaccination rates varied among racial and ethnic groups, further exacerbating COVID-19-related health disparities. This study explores the relationship between vaccination status and perspectives on COVID-19-related topics among racially and ethnically diverse NYC residents. The New York Community Engagement Alliance Against COVID-19 Disparities (NYCEAL) conducted focus groups with NYC residents to explore their perceptions about vaccine effectiveness and barriers to vaccination that may impact vaccine decision-making. We conducted seven focus groups between December 2021 and April 2022 in English and Spanish with individuals grouped based on vaccination status: (1) those vaccinated when vaccines first became available, (2) those vaccinated after mandates were announced, and (3) those who remained unvaccinated. Transcripts were initially analyzed using a priori and in vivo codes, and the team utilized framework analysis to examine similarities and differences across groups. Emerging themes centered on trust in science, perceived vaccine effectiveness, and the evolution of people's COVID-19-related perspectives, experiences, and behaviors over time. Although there were distinctions between groups on concepts like trust in science and perceived vaccine effectiveness, people's cognitive biases seemed to affect their perceptions but not necessarily their (vaccine-related) behaviors. Findings from this study may help public health professionals understand vaccine decision-making from the perspective of a diverse set of New Yorkers for use during future epidemics.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.