COVID-19疫苗有效性和疫苗接种障碍:基于疫苗接种状况的认知比较

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Saskia Shuman, Timnit Berhane, Devin Madden, Rita Larson, Ariel Jacobs, Jacqueline Chiofalo, Nita Vangeepuram
{"title":"COVID-19疫苗有效性和疫苗接种障碍:基于疫苗接种状况的认知比较","authors":"Saskia Shuman, Timnit Berhane, Devin Madden, Rita Larson, Ariel Jacobs, Jacqueline Chiofalo, Nita Vangeepuram","doi":"10.1007/s40615-024-02243-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>New York City (NYC) was the first epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA. Despite the availability of COVID-19 vaccines by 2021, vaccination rates varied among racial and ethnic groups, further exacerbating COVID-19-related health disparities. This study explores the relationship between vaccination status and perspectives on COVID-19-related topics among racially and ethnically diverse NYC residents. The New York Community Engagement Alliance Against COVID-19 Disparities (NYCEAL) conducted focus groups with NYC residents to explore their perceptions about vaccine effectiveness and barriers to vaccination that may impact vaccine decision-making. We conducted seven focus groups between December 2021 and April 2022 in English and Spanish with individuals grouped based on vaccination status: (1) those vaccinated when vaccines first became available, (2) those vaccinated after mandates were announced, and (3) those who remained unvaccinated. Transcripts were initially analyzed using a priori and in vivo codes, and the team utilized framework analysis to examine similarities and differences across groups. Emerging themes centered on trust in science, perceived vaccine effectiveness, and the evolution of people's COVID-19-related perspectives, experiences, and behaviors over time. Although there were distinctions between groups on concepts like trust in science and perceived vaccine effectiveness, people's cognitive biases seemed to affect their perceptions but not necessarily their (vaccine-related) behaviors. Findings from this study may help public health professionals understand vaccine decision-making from the perspective of a diverse set of New Yorkers for use during future epidemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness and Barriers to Vaccination: Comparing Perceptions Based on Vaccination Status.\",\"authors\":\"Saskia Shuman, Timnit Berhane, Devin Madden, Rita Larson, Ariel Jacobs, Jacqueline Chiofalo, Nita Vangeepuram\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40615-024-02243-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>New York City (NYC) was the first epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA. Despite the availability of COVID-19 vaccines by 2021, vaccination rates varied among racial and ethnic groups, further exacerbating COVID-19-related health disparities. This study explores the relationship between vaccination status and perspectives on COVID-19-related topics among racially and ethnically diverse NYC residents. The New York Community Engagement Alliance Against COVID-19 Disparities (NYCEAL) conducted focus groups with NYC residents to explore their perceptions about vaccine effectiveness and barriers to vaccination that may impact vaccine decision-making. We conducted seven focus groups between December 2021 and April 2022 in English and Spanish with individuals grouped based on vaccination status: (1) those vaccinated when vaccines first became available, (2) those vaccinated after mandates were announced, and (3) those who remained unvaccinated. Transcripts were initially analyzed using a priori and in vivo codes, and the team utilized framework analysis to examine similarities and differences across groups. Emerging themes centered on trust in science, perceived vaccine effectiveness, and the evolution of people's COVID-19-related perspectives, experiences, and behaviors over time. Although there were distinctions between groups on concepts like trust in science and perceived vaccine effectiveness, people's cognitive biases seemed to affect their perceptions but not necessarily their (vaccine-related) behaviors. Findings from this study may help public health professionals understand vaccine decision-making from the perspective of a diverse set of New Yorkers for use during future epidemics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02243-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02243-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纽约市是美国第一个新冠肺炎大流行的中心。尽管到2021年可获得COVID-19疫苗,但不同种族和族裔群体的疫苗接种率存在差异,进一步加剧了与COVID-19相关的健康差距。本研究探讨了纽约市不同种族和民族居民中疫苗接种状况与对covid -19相关话题的看法之间的关系。纽约社区参与联盟应对COVID-19差异(NYCEAL)与纽约市居民进行了焦点小组讨论,探讨他们对疫苗有效性的看法以及可能影响疫苗决策的疫苗接种障碍。我们在2021年12月至2022年4月期间用英语和西班牙语对七个焦点小组进行了分组,根据疫苗接种状况进行分组:(1)首次接种疫苗时接种疫苗的人,(2)宣布授权后接种疫苗的人,以及(3)未接种疫苗的人。转录本最初使用先验和体内代码进行分析,团队利用框架分析来检查组间的相似性和差异性。新出现的主题集中在对科学的信任、对疫苗有效性的认知以及人们对covid -19相关观点、经历和行为随时间的演变。尽管不同群体在信任科学和感知疫苗有效性等概念上存在差异,但人们的认知偏见似乎会影响他们的感知,但不一定会影响他们的(与疫苗相关的)行为。这项研究的发现可以帮助公共卫生专业人员从不同的纽约人的角度理解疫苗决策,以便在未来的流行病中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness and Barriers to Vaccination: Comparing Perceptions Based on Vaccination Status.

New York City (NYC) was the first epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA. Despite the availability of COVID-19 vaccines by 2021, vaccination rates varied among racial and ethnic groups, further exacerbating COVID-19-related health disparities. This study explores the relationship between vaccination status and perspectives on COVID-19-related topics among racially and ethnically diverse NYC residents. The New York Community Engagement Alliance Against COVID-19 Disparities (NYCEAL) conducted focus groups with NYC residents to explore their perceptions about vaccine effectiveness and barriers to vaccination that may impact vaccine decision-making. We conducted seven focus groups between December 2021 and April 2022 in English and Spanish with individuals grouped based on vaccination status: (1) those vaccinated when vaccines first became available, (2) those vaccinated after mandates were announced, and (3) those who remained unvaccinated. Transcripts were initially analyzed using a priori and in vivo codes, and the team utilized framework analysis to examine similarities and differences across groups. Emerging themes centered on trust in science, perceived vaccine effectiveness, and the evolution of people's COVID-19-related perspectives, experiences, and behaviors over time. Although there were distinctions between groups on concepts like trust in science and perceived vaccine effectiveness, people's cognitive biases seemed to affect their perceptions but not necessarily their (vaccine-related) behaviors. Findings from this study may help public health professionals understand vaccine decision-making from the perspective of a diverse set of New Yorkers for use during future epidemics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信