磁转移血流无关的深色血液延迟增强心脏MRI优化st段抬高心肌梗死边界的区分。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-11192-7
Paulina Poskaite, Christian Kremser, Mathias Pamminger, Felix Troger, Gert Reiter, Sebastian J Reinstadler, Bernhard Metzler, Wolfgang G Rehwald, Raymond J Kim, Agnes Mayr
{"title":"磁转移血流无关的深色血液延迟增强心脏MRI优化st段抬高心肌梗死边界的区分。","authors":"Paulina Poskaite, Christian Kremser, Mathias Pamminger, Felix Troger, Gert Reiter, Sebastian J Reinstadler, Bernhard Metzler, Wolfgang G Rehwald, Raymond J Kim, Agnes Mayr","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-11192-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To prospectively compare image quality and infarct sizing methods between magnetization-transfer \"flow-independent dark-blood delayed enhancement\" (MT-FIDDLE) and standard \"bright-blood\"-late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac-magnetic-resonance (CMR) sequence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>\"Bright-blood\"-LGE and MT-FIDDLE sequence were acquired in 110 patients at 4 days (n = 33), 4 months (n = 39) and 12 months (n = 38) after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Subjective image quality, including confidence in infarct segmentation and blood-pool bordering, were each rated on a 4-point Likert scale. Objective image quality was assessed by the detectability index (DI). Infarct volumes derived via full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) and different number of standard deviations (\"n-SD\") methods on MT-FIDDLE images were compared with FWHM and reference 5-SD results from \"bright-blood-LGE images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall subjective median image quality was excellent for both LGE sequences. Qualitative analysis revealed a significantly higher confidence in infarct segmentation and in blood-pool bordering for MT-FIDDLE as compared to \"bright-blood\"-LGE (all p < 0.001). Infarct volumes assessed by the FWHM technique on MT-FIDDLE and \"bright-blood\"-LGE showed excellent agreement overall (Concordance correlation coefficient, CCC = 0.96). The 3-SD technique for MT-FIDDLE showed the best agreement with the 5-SD method for \"bright-blood\"-LGE overall (CCC = 0.94), as well as in the subgroup with excellent confidence in infarct segmentation on \"bright-blood\"-LGE (CCC = 0.96). DI of scar versus LV blood-pool was higher for MT-FIDDLE (8.9 ± 5.5) compared to \"bright-blood\"-LGE sequence (2.0 ± 1.5; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MT-FIDDLE significantly optimizes the discrimination between myocardial infarction and adjacent blood-pool in STEMI patients. As compared to the established 5-SD technique on \"bright-blood\"-LGE, the 3-SD method on MT-FIDDLE results in consistent infarct volumes.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Does magnetization-transfer \"flow-independent dark-blood delayed enhancement\" (MT-FIDDLE) offer any benefits over standard \"bright-blood\"-late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac-magnetic-resonance (CMR) for identifying STEMI infarct borders? Findings MT-FIDDLE image quality was higher than LGE CMR and measured infarct volume comparability to the standard 5-SD-threshold-technique. Clinical relevance MT-FIDDLE facilitates the assessment of myocardial infarctions at the subendocardial border, improving the discrimination between myocardial infarction and adjacent blood-pool in STEMI patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"3030-3041"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Magnetization-transfer flow-independent dark-blood delayed enhancement cardiac MRI optimizes discrimination of ST-elevation myocardial infarct borders.\",\"authors\":\"Paulina Poskaite, Christian Kremser, Mathias Pamminger, Felix Troger, Gert Reiter, Sebastian J Reinstadler, Bernhard Metzler, Wolfgang G Rehwald, Raymond J Kim, Agnes Mayr\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00330-024-11192-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To prospectively compare image quality and infarct sizing methods between magnetization-transfer \\\"flow-independent dark-blood delayed enhancement\\\" (MT-FIDDLE) and standard \\\"bright-blood\\\"-late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac-magnetic-resonance (CMR) sequence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>\\\"Bright-blood\\\"-LGE and MT-FIDDLE sequence were acquired in 110 patients at 4 days (n = 33), 4 months (n = 39) and 12 months (n = 38) after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Subjective image quality, including confidence in infarct segmentation and blood-pool bordering, were each rated on a 4-point Likert scale. Objective image quality was assessed by the detectability index (DI). Infarct volumes derived via full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) and different number of standard deviations (\\\"n-SD\\\") methods on MT-FIDDLE images were compared with FWHM and reference 5-SD results from \\\"bright-blood-LGE images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall subjective median image quality was excellent for both LGE sequences. Qualitative analysis revealed a significantly higher confidence in infarct segmentation and in blood-pool bordering for MT-FIDDLE as compared to \\\"bright-blood\\\"-LGE (all p < 0.001). Infarct volumes assessed by the FWHM technique on MT-FIDDLE and \\\"bright-blood\\\"-LGE showed excellent agreement overall (Concordance correlation coefficient, CCC = 0.96). The 3-SD technique for MT-FIDDLE showed the best agreement with the 5-SD method for \\\"bright-blood\\\"-LGE overall (CCC = 0.94), as well as in the subgroup with excellent confidence in infarct segmentation on \\\"bright-blood\\\"-LGE (CCC = 0.96). DI of scar versus LV blood-pool was higher for MT-FIDDLE (8.9 ± 5.5) compared to \\\"bright-blood\\\"-LGE sequence (2.0 ± 1.5; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MT-FIDDLE significantly optimizes the discrimination between myocardial infarction and adjacent blood-pool in STEMI patients. As compared to the established 5-SD technique on \\\"bright-blood\\\"-LGE, the 3-SD method on MT-FIDDLE results in consistent infarct volumes.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Does magnetization-transfer \\\"flow-independent dark-blood delayed enhancement\\\" (MT-FIDDLE) offer any benefits over standard \\\"bright-blood\\\"-late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac-magnetic-resonance (CMR) for identifying STEMI infarct borders? Findings MT-FIDDLE image quality was higher than LGE CMR and measured infarct volume comparability to the standard 5-SD-threshold-technique. Clinical relevance MT-FIDDLE facilitates the assessment of myocardial infarctions at the subendocardial border, improving the discrimination between myocardial infarction and adjacent blood-pool in STEMI patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3030-3041\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081512/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11192-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11192-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:前瞻性地比较磁化转移“血流无关的暗血延迟增强”(MT-FIDDLE)和标准“亮血”-晚钆增强(LGE)心脏磁共振(CMR)序列的图像质量和梗死面积测定方法。方法:对110例急性st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)后4 d (n = 33)、4个月(n = 39)和12个月(n = 38)的患者进行“Bright-blood”-LGE和MT-FIDDLE序列测定。主观图像质量,包括梗死分割和血池边界的置信度,均按4分李克特量表评分。用可检测性指数(detection index, DI)评价客观图像质量。将MT-FIDDLE图像上通过半最大全宽(FWHM)和不同标准偏差数(n-SD)方法得出的梗死体积与“亮血lge”图像上的FWHM和参考5-SD结果进行比较。结果:两个LGE序列的总体主观图像质量中值都很好。定性分析显示,与“bright-blood”-LGE相比,MT-FIDDLE在梗死分割和血池边界上的置信度显著提高(均p)。结论:MT-FIDDLE显著优化了STEMI患者心肌梗死和邻近血池的区分。与已建立的“亮血”-LGE的5-SD技术相比,MT-FIDDLE的3-SD方法可获得一致的梗死面积。在鉴别STEMI梗死边界时,磁化转移“血流无关的暗血延迟增强”(MT-FIDDLE)是否比标准的“亮血”-晚钆增强(LGE)心脏磁共振(CMR)有任何好处?发现MT-FIDDLE图像质量高于LGE CMR,测量的梗死体积与标准5- sd阈值技术的可比性。MT-FIDDLE有助于评估心内膜下边界心肌梗死,提高STEMI患者心肌梗死与邻近血池的区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Magnetization-transfer flow-independent dark-blood delayed enhancement cardiac MRI optimizes discrimination of ST-elevation myocardial infarct borders.

Objectives: To prospectively compare image quality and infarct sizing methods between magnetization-transfer "flow-independent dark-blood delayed enhancement" (MT-FIDDLE) and standard "bright-blood"-late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac-magnetic-resonance (CMR) sequence.

Methods: "Bright-blood"-LGE and MT-FIDDLE sequence were acquired in 110 patients at 4 days (n = 33), 4 months (n = 39) and 12 months (n = 38) after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Subjective image quality, including confidence in infarct segmentation and blood-pool bordering, were each rated on a 4-point Likert scale. Objective image quality was assessed by the detectability index (DI). Infarct volumes derived via full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) and different number of standard deviations ("n-SD") methods on MT-FIDDLE images were compared with FWHM and reference 5-SD results from "bright-blood-LGE images.

Results: Overall subjective median image quality was excellent for both LGE sequences. Qualitative analysis revealed a significantly higher confidence in infarct segmentation and in blood-pool bordering for MT-FIDDLE as compared to "bright-blood"-LGE (all p < 0.001). Infarct volumes assessed by the FWHM technique on MT-FIDDLE and "bright-blood"-LGE showed excellent agreement overall (Concordance correlation coefficient, CCC = 0.96). The 3-SD technique for MT-FIDDLE showed the best agreement with the 5-SD method for "bright-blood"-LGE overall (CCC = 0.94), as well as in the subgroup with excellent confidence in infarct segmentation on "bright-blood"-LGE (CCC = 0.96). DI of scar versus LV blood-pool was higher for MT-FIDDLE (8.9 ± 5.5) compared to "bright-blood"-LGE sequence (2.0 ± 1.5; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: MT-FIDDLE significantly optimizes the discrimination between myocardial infarction and adjacent blood-pool in STEMI patients. As compared to the established 5-SD technique on "bright-blood"-LGE, the 3-SD method on MT-FIDDLE results in consistent infarct volumes.

Key points: Question Does magnetization-transfer "flow-independent dark-blood delayed enhancement" (MT-FIDDLE) offer any benefits over standard "bright-blood"-late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac-magnetic-resonance (CMR) for identifying STEMI infarct borders? Findings MT-FIDDLE image quality was higher than LGE CMR and measured infarct volume comparability to the standard 5-SD-threshold-technique. Clinical relevance MT-FIDDLE facilitates the assessment of myocardial infarctions at the subendocardial border, improving the discrimination between myocardial infarction and adjacent blood-pool in STEMI patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信