运动训练引起的V˙o2动力学加速不具有强度域特异性,也不与运动表现指标相关。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
European Journal of Applied Physiology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1007/s00421-024-05674-1
Erin Calaine Inglis, Letizia Rasica, Danilo Iannetta, Kate M Sales, Daniel A Keir, Martin J MacInnis, Juan M Murias
{"title":"运动训练引起的V˙o2动力学加速不具有强度域特异性,也不与运动表现指标相关。","authors":"Erin Calaine Inglis, Letizia Rasica, Danilo Iannetta, Kate M Sales, Daniel A Keir, Martin J MacInnis, Juan M Murias","doi":"10.1007/s00421-024-05674-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined the effect of 3 and 6 weeks of intensity domain-based exercise training on <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </math> kinetics changes and their relationship with indices of performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-four young healthy participants (42 M, 42 F) were randomly assigned to six groups (14 participants each, age and sex-matched) consisting of: continuous cycling in the (1) moderate (MOD)-, (2) lower heavy (HVY1)-, and (3) upper heavy-intensity (HVY2)- domain; interval cycling in the (4) severe-intensity domain (i.e., high-intensity interval training (HIIT), or (5) extreme-intensity domain (i.e., sprint-interval training (SIT)); or (6) control (CON). Training participants completed two three-week phases of three supervised sessions per week, with physiological evaluations performed at PRE, MID and POST intervention. All training protocols, except SIT, were work-matched.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant time effect for the time constant ( <math><mrow><mi>τ</mi> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </mrow> </math> ) between PRE (31.6 ± 10.4 s) and MID (22.6 ± 6.9 s) (p < 0.05) and PRE and POST (21.8 ± 6.3 s) (p < 0.05), but no difference between MID and POST (p > 0.05) and no group or interaction effects (p > 0.05). There were no PRE to POST differences for CON (p < 0.05) in any variables. Despite significant increases in maximal <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </math> ( <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mtext>2max</mtext></msub> </math> ), estimated lactate threshold (θ<sub>LT</sub>), maximal metabolic steady state (MMSS), and peak power output (PPO) for the intervention groups (p < 0.05), there were no significant correlations from PRE to MID or MID to POST between <math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>τ</mi> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </mrow> </math> and <math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mtext>2max</mtext></msub> </mrow> </math> (r = - 0.221, r = 0.119), ΔPPO (r = - 0.112, r = - 0.017), Δθ<sub>LT</sub> (r = 0.083, r = 0.142) and ΔMMSS (r = - 0.213, r = 0.049)(p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that (i) the rapid speeding of <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </math> kinetics was not intensity-dependent; and (ii) changes in indices of performance were not significantly correlated with <math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>τ</mi> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </mrow> </math> .</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":"1297-1310"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12055666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<ArticleTitle xmlns:ns0=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\">Exercise training-induced speeding of <ns0:math> <ns0:msub> <ns0:mrow><ns0:mover><ns0:mtext>V</ns0:mtext> <ns0:mo>˙</ns0:mo></ns0:mover> <ns0:mtext>O</ns0:mtext></ns0:mrow> <ns0:mn>2</ns0:mn></ns0:msub> </ns0:math> kinetics is not intensity domain-specific or correlated with indices of exercise performance.\",\"authors\":\"Erin Calaine Inglis, Letizia Rasica, Danilo Iannetta, Kate M Sales, Daniel A Keir, Martin J MacInnis, Juan M Murias\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00421-024-05674-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined the effect of 3 and 6 weeks of intensity domain-based exercise training on <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </math> kinetics changes and their relationship with indices of performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-four young healthy participants (42 M, 42 F) were randomly assigned to six groups (14 participants each, age and sex-matched) consisting of: continuous cycling in the (1) moderate (MOD)-, (2) lower heavy (HVY1)-, and (3) upper heavy-intensity (HVY2)- domain; interval cycling in the (4) severe-intensity domain (i.e., high-intensity interval training (HIIT), or (5) extreme-intensity domain (i.e., sprint-interval training (SIT)); or (6) control (CON). Training participants completed two three-week phases of three supervised sessions per week, with physiological evaluations performed at PRE, MID and POST intervention. All training protocols, except SIT, were work-matched.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant time effect for the time constant ( <math><mrow><mi>τ</mi> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </mrow> </math> ) between PRE (31.6 ± 10.4 s) and MID (22.6 ± 6.9 s) (p < 0.05) and PRE and POST (21.8 ± 6.3 s) (p < 0.05), but no difference between MID and POST (p > 0.05) and no group or interaction effects (p > 0.05). There were no PRE to POST differences for CON (p < 0.05) in any variables. Despite significant increases in maximal <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </math> ( <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mtext>2max</mtext></msub> </math> ), estimated lactate threshold (θ<sub>LT</sub>), maximal metabolic steady state (MMSS), and peak power output (PPO) for the intervention groups (p < 0.05), there were no significant correlations from PRE to MID or MID to POST between <math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>τ</mi> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </mrow> </math> and <math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mtext>2max</mtext></msub> </mrow> </math> (r = - 0.221, r = 0.119), ΔPPO (r = - 0.112, r = - 0.017), Δθ<sub>LT</sub> (r = 0.083, r = 0.142) and ΔMMSS (r = - 0.213, r = 0.049)(p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that (i) the rapid speeding of <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </math> kinetics was not intensity-dependent; and (ii) changes in indices of performance were not significantly correlated with <math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>τ</mi> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </mrow> </math> .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1297-1310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12055666/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05674-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05674-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究探讨了3周和6周强度域运动训练对V˙O 2动力学变化的影响及其与运动表现指标的关系。方法:84名年轻健康参与者(42名男性,42名女性)随机分为6组(每组14名,年龄和性别匹配),包括:在(1)中度(MOD)-,(2)低强度(HVY1)-和(3)高强度(HVY2)-区域连续骑行;(4)高强度领域(即高强度间歇训练(HIIT))或(5)极端强度领域(即短跑-间歇训练(SIT))的间歇骑行;(6)控制(CON)训练参与者完成了两个为期三周的阶段,每周三次有监督的会议,在PRE, MID和POST干预期间进行生理评估。除了SIT之外,所有的训练方案都是工作匹配的。结果:PRE(31.6±10.4 s)与MID(22.6±6.9 s)在时间常数τ V˙o2上存在显著的时间效应(p < 0.05),无组效应或交互效应(p < 0.05)。反对没有PRE发布差异(p V˙O 2 (V˙O 2 max),估计乳酸阈值(θLT)、最大代谢稳态(mms),和峰值功率输出(PPO)干预组(pΔτV O 2和Δ˙˙O 2马克斯(r = - 0.221, r = 0.119),ΔPPO (r = - 0.112, r = - 0.017),ΔθLT (r = 0.083, r = 0.142)和Δmms (r = - 0.213, r = 0.049) (p > 0.05)。结论:该研究表明(i) V˙o2动力学的快速加速不依赖于强度;(ii)性能指标的变化与Δ τ V˙o2无显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exercise training-induced speeding of V ˙ O 2 kinetics is not intensity domain-specific or correlated with indices of exercise performance.

Purpose: This study examined the effect of 3 and 6 weeks of intensity domain-based exercise training on V ˙ O 2 kinetics changes and their relationship with indices of performance.

Methods: Eighty-four young healthy participants (42 M, 42 F) were randomly assigned to six groups (14 participants each, age and sex-matched) consisting of: continuous cycling in the (1) moderate (MOD)-, (2) lower heavy (HVY1)-, and (3) upper heavy-intensity (HVY2)- domain; interval cycling in the (4) severe-intensity domain (i.e., high-intensity interval training (HIIT), or (5) extreme-intensity domain (i.e., sprint-interval training (SIT)); or (6) control (CON). Training participants completed two three-week phases of three supervised sessions per week, with physiological evaluations performed at PRE, MID and POST intervention. All training protocols, except SIT, were work-matched.

Results: There was a significant time effect for the time constant ( τ V ˙ O 2 ) between PRE (31.6 ± 10.4 s) and MID (22.6 ± 6.9 s) (p < 0.05) and PRE and POST (21.8 ± 6.3 s) (p < 0.05), but no difference between MID and POST (p > 0.05) and no group or interaction effects (p > 0.05). There were no PRE to POST differences for CON (p < 0.05) in any variables. Despite significant increases in maximal V ˙ O 2 ( V ˙ O 2max ), estimated lactate threshold (θLT), maximal metabolic steady state (MMSS), and peak power output (PPO) for the intervention groups (p < 0.05), there were no significant correlations from PRE to MID or MID to POST between Δ τ V ˙ O 2 and Δ V ˙ O 2max (r = - 0.221, r = 0.119), ΔPPO (r = - 0.112, r = - 0.017), ΔθLT (r = 0.083, r = 0.142) and ΔMMSS (r = - 0.213, r = 0.049)(p > 0.05).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that (i) the rapid speeding of V ˙ O 2 kinetics was not intensity-dependent; and (ii) changes in indices of performance were not significantly correlated with Δ τ V ˙ O 2 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
227
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信