揭示局灶性癫痫的语言缺陷:超越名词命名和语言流畅性的限制。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
A D Reardon, L Gillinder, D A Copland, K L McMahon, S L E Brownsett
{"title":"揭示局灶性癫痫的语言缺陷:超越名词命名和语言流畅性的限制。","authors":"A D Reardon, L Gillinder, D A Copland, K L McMahon, S L E Brownsett","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A range of language impairments have been reported in people with epilepsy both pre- and post-surgically, however language is not routinely comprehensively assessed in epilepsy clinics. When language is assessed, this is typically as part of a broader neuropsychological battery of assessment, often limited to tests of noun naming and/or verbal fluency, despite evidence to suggest these tests are not sufficiently sensitive to detect the often-subtle deficits present in chronic focal epilepsy. Many areas of language function, including the production of connected speech, have also not been adequately explored in this population, and research relating to subjective report of language and communication difficulties is limited. A more comprehensive assessment of language, which includes patient report, is required to determine the presence and extent of language impairment in people with focal epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the present study was to systematically investigate the prevalence and pattern of language impairment in a group of people with chronic focal epilepsy using a comprehensive aphasia battery and a patient reported outcome measure.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Language skills were assessed in 26 right-handed people with chronic focal epilepsy using the Comprehensive Aphasia test (CAT), in addition to standard clinical assessments of noun naming and verbal fluency. Participants' self-report of their language and communication skills was also collected, using the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire (LCQ).</p><p><strong>Outcomes and results: </strong>85% of participants with focal epilepsy were impaired on one or more language subtests of the CAT. In contrast, only 15% of participants were impaired on tests of confrontation noun naming, and none were impaired on a test of verbal fluency. The CAT findings were supported by subjective data, with 82% of participants self-reporting a communication difficulty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results show that current approaches to language assessment are inadequate for identifying language impairments in people with focal epilepsy, and likely underestimate the prevalence of language impairment in this population. In particular, verb naming and picture description subtests revealed deficits across the majority of the sample, highlighting the need for more comprehensive assessment of language to be routinely conducted in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"163 ","pages":"110181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncovering language deficits in focal epilepsy: Beyond the limits of noun naming and verbal fluency.\",\"authors\":\"A D Reardon, L Gillinder, D A Copland, K L McMahon, S L E Brownsett\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A range of language impairments have been reported in people with epilepsy both pre- and post-surgically, however language is not routinely comprehensively assessed in epilepsy clinics. When language is assessed, this is typically as part of a broader neuropsychological battery of assessment, often limited to tests of noun naming and/or verbal fluency, despite evidence to suggest these tests are not sufficiently sensitive to detect the often-subtle deficits present in chronic focal epilepsy. Many areas of language function, including the production of connected speech, have also not been adequately explored in this population, and research relating to subjective report of language and communication difficulties is limited. A more comprehensive assessment of language, which includes patient report, is required to determine the presence and extent of language impairment in people with focal epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the present study was to systematically investigate the prevalence and pattern of language impairment in a group of people with chronic focal epilepsy using a comprehensive aphasia battery and a patient reported outcome measure.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Language skills were assessed in 26 right-handed people with chronic focal epilepsy using the Comprehensive Aphasia test (CAT), in addition to standard clinical assessments of noun naming and verbal fluency. Participants' self-report of their language and communication skills was also collected, using the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire (LCQ).</p><p><strong>Outcomes and results: </strong>85% of participants with focal epilepsy were impaired on one or more language subtests of the CAT. In contrast, only 15% of participants were impaired on tests of confrontation noun naming, and none were impaired on a test of verbal fluency. The CAT findings were supported by subjective data, with 82% of participants self-reporting a communication difficulty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results show that current approaches to language assessment are inadequate for identifying language impairments in people with focal epilepsy, and likely underestimate the prevalence of language impairment in this population. In particular, verb naming and picture description subtests revealed deficits across the majority of the sample, highlighting the need for more comprehensive assessment of language to be routinely conducted in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsy & Behavior\",\"volume\":\"163 \",\"pages\":\"110181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsy & Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110181\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110181","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:癫痫患者在手术前和手术后都有一系列语言障碍的报道,然而在癫痫诊所中,语言能力并没有得到常规的全面评估。当评估语言时,这通常是作为更广泛的神经心理学评估的一部分,通常仅限于名词命名和/或语言流畅性的测试,尽管有证据表明这些测试不够敏感,无法发现慢性局灶性癫痫中经常存在的细微缺陷。语言功能的许多领域,包括连接语音的产生,也没有在这一人群中得到充分的探索,有关语言和沟通困难的主观报告的研究也很有限。需要对语言进行更全面的评估,包括患者报告,以确定局灶性癫痫患者是否存在语言障碍及其程度。目的:本研究的目的是系统地调查一组慢性局灶性癫痫患者语言障碍的患病率和模式,使用综合失语电池和患者报告的结果测量。方法:采用综合失语测验(CAT)对26例慢性局灶性癫痫右撇子患者的语言能力进行评估,并对其进行名词命名和语言流畅性的标准临床评估。使用拉筹伯沟通问卷(LCQ)收集参与者的语言和沟通能力自述。结果和结果:85%的局灶性癫痫患者在CAT的一项或多项语言测试中受损。相比之下,只有15%的参与者在对抗性名词命名测试中受损,没有人在语言流畅性测试中受损。CAT的调查结果得到了主观数据的支持,82%的参与者自我报告有沟通困难。结论:我们的研究结果表明,目前的语言评估方法不足以识别局灶性癫痫患者的语言障碍,并且可能低估了该人群中语言障碍的患病率。特别是,动词命名和图片描述子测试揭示了大多数样本的缺陷,突出了对这一人群进行更全面的语言常规评估的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uncovering language deficits in focal epilepsy: Beyond the limits of noun naming and verbal fluency.

Background: A range of language impairments have been reported in people with epilepsy both pre- and post-surgically, however language is not routinely comprehensively assessed in epilepsy clinics. When language is assessed, this is typically as part of a broader neuropsychological battery of assessment, often limited to tests of noun naming and/or verbal fluency, despite evidence to suggest these tests are not sufficiently sensitive to detect the often-subtle deficits present in chronic focal epilepsy. Many areas of language function, including the production of connected speech, have also not been adequately explored in this population, and research relating to subjective report of language and communication difficulties is limited. A more comprehensive assessment of language, which includes patient report, is required to determine the presence and extent of language impairment in people with focal epilepsy.

Aim: The aim of the present study was to systematically investigate the prevalence and pattern of language impairment in a group of people with chronic focal epilepsy using a comprehensive aphasia battery and a patient reported outcome measure.

Method: Language skills were assessed in 26 right-handed people with chronic focal epilepsy using the Comprehensive Aphasia test (CAT), in addition to standard clinical assessments of noun naming and verbal fluency. Participants' self-report of their language and communication skills was also collected, using the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire (LCQ).

Outcomes and results: 85% of participants with focal epilepsy were impaired on one or more language subtests of the CAT. In contrast, only 15% of participants were impaired on tests of confrontation noun naming, and none were impaired on a test of verbal fluency. The CAT findings were supported by subjective data, with 82% of participants self-reporting a communication difficulty.

Conclusions: Our results show that current approaches to language assessment are inadequate for identifying language impairments in people with focal epilepsy, and likely underestimate the prevalence of language impairment in this population. In particular, verb naming and picture description subtests revealed deficits across the majority of the sample, highlighting the need for more comprehensive assessment of language to be routinely conducted in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信