Olli Peltola , Toprak Aslan , Mika Aurela , Annalea Lohila , Ivan Mammarella , Dario Papale , Christoph K. Thomas , Timo Vesala , Tuomas Laurila
{"title":"涡流相关通量观测中检测垂直流解耦的增强度量","authors":"Olli Peltola , Toprak Aslan , Mika Aurela , Annalea Lohila , Ivan Mammarella , Dario Papale , Christoph K. Thomas , Timo Vesala , Tuomas Laurila","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The eddy covariance (EC) technique has emerged as the method of choice for observing ecosystem–atmosphere interactions across biomes and climate zones. However, EC measurements are biased when the turbulent flow is decoupled from the underlying surface, severely limiting the applicability of the technique in observing surface–atmosphere fluxes. Friction velocity (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>u</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>∗</mo></mrow></msub></math></span>) is typically used to detect and filter these periods from EC flux time series. The processes that control decoupling are understood qualitatively, including the strength of vertical turbulent mixing, stable stratification and canopy drag. However, the standard practice utilising <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>u</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>∗</mo></mrow></msub></math></span> misses most of these processes, resulting in a significant uncertainty in detecting decoupling. Consequently, a quantitative metric, <span><math><mi>Ω</mi></math></span>, which encapsulates all these processes in a unified framework, was recently proposed. However, it has not yet been systematically tested over a range of ecosystems and site characteristics. The objectives of this study were therefore to test the efficacy of <span><math><mi>Ω</mi></math></span> at a diverse range of EC sites, to quantify the processes controlling decoupling across sites, and to compare <span><math><mi>Ω</mi></math></span> against other decoupling metrics, such as <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>u</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>∗</mo></mrow></msub></math></span>. A similar <span><math><mi>Ω</mi></math></span> threshold value for coupling was observed at all the 45 tested EC sites, with a value of 0.59 (median; 0.5...0.63 interquartile range). This indicates that the <span><math><mi>Ω</mi></math></span> metric captured the essential features of decoupling across sites, thereby enabling deeper analyzes of the causes of decoupling. For example, <span><math><mi>Ω</mi></math></span> indicates that (1) flows above dense forest canopies can be decoupled from the forest floor also during the daytime due to canopy drag and that (2) during stable stratification decoupling is more likely with tall towers. These findings significantly enhance our scientific understanding of the underlying causes of decoupling, will inform improved analyzes of EC data and support near-surface turbulence transport analyzes in open and forested landscapes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"362 ","pages":"Article 110326"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards an enhanced metric for detecting vertical flow decoupling in eddy covariance flux observations\",\"authors\":\"Olli Peltola , Toprak Aslan , Mika Aurela , Annalea Lohila , Ivan Mammarella , Dario Papale , Christoph K. Thomas , Timo Vesala , Tuomas Laurila\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The eddy covariance (EC) technique has emerged as the method of choice for observing ecosystem–atmosphere interactions across biomes and climate zones. However, EC measurements are biased when the turbulent flow is decoupled from the underlying surface, severely limiting the applicability of the technique in observing surface–atmosphere fluxes. Friction velocity (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>u</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>∗</mo></mrow></msub></math></span>) is typically used to detect and filter these periods from EC flux time series. The processes that control decoupling are understood qualitatively, including the strength of vertical turbulent mixing, stable stratification and canopy drag. However, the standard practice utilising <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>u</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>∗</mo></mrow></msub></math></span> misses most of these processes, resulting in a significant uncertainty in detecting decoupling. Consequently, a quantitative metric, <span><math><mi>Ω</mi></math></span>, which encapsulates all these processes in a unified framework, was recently proposed. However, it has not yet been systematically tested over a range of ecosystems and site characteristics. The objectives of this study were therefore to test the efficacy of <span><math><mi>Ω</mi></math></span> at a diverse range of EC sites, to quantify the processes controlling decoupling across sites, and to compare <span><math><mi>Ω</mi></math></span> against other decoupling metrics, such as <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>u</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>∗</mo></mrow></msub></math></span>. A similar <span><math><mi>Ω</mi></math></span> threshold value for coupling was observed at all the 45 tested EC sites, with a value of 0.59 (median; 0.5...0.63 interquartile range). This indicates that the <span><math><mi>Ω</mi></math></span> metric captured the essential features of decoupling across sites, thereby enabling deeper analyzes of the causes of decoupling. For example, <span><math><mi>Ω</mi></math></span> indicates that (1) flows above dense forest canopies can be decoupled from the forest floor also during the daytime due to canopy drag and that (2) during stable stratification decoupling is more likely with tall towers. These findings significantly enhance our scientific understanding of the underlying causes of decoupling, will inform improved analyzes of EC data and support near-surface turbulence transport analyzes in open and forested landscapes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"volume\":\"362 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192324004398\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192324004398","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Towards an enhanced metric for detecting vertical flow decoupling in eddy covariance flux observations
The eddy covariance (EC) technique has emerged as the method of choice for observing ecosystem–atmosphere interactions across biomes and climate zones. However, EC measurements are biased when the turbulent flow is decoupled from the underlying surface, severely limiting the applicability of the technique in observing surface–atmosphere fluxes. Friction velocity () is typically used to detect and filter these periods from EC flux time series. The processes that control decoupling are understood qualitatively, including the strength of vertical turbulent mixing, stable stratification and canopy drag. However, the standard practice utilising misses most of these processes, resulting in a significant uncertainty in detecting decoupling. Consequently, a quantitative metric, , which encapsulates all these processes in a unified framework, was recently proposed. However, it has not yet been systematically tested over a range of ecosystems and site characteristics. The objectives of this study were therefore to test the efficacy of at a diverse range of EC sites, to quantify the processes controlling decoupling across sites, and to compare against other decoupling metrics, such as . A similar threshold value for coupling was observed at all the 45 tested EC sites, with a value of 0.59 (median; 0.5...0.63 interquartile range). This indicates that the metric captured the essential features of decoupling across sites, thereby enabling deeper analyzes of the causes of decoupling. For example, indicates that (1) flows above dense forest canopies can be decoupled from the forest floor also during the daytime due to canopy drag and that (2) during stable stratification decoupling is more likely with tall towers. These findings significantly enhance our scientific understanding of the underlying causes of decoupling, will inform improved analyzes of EC data and support near-surface turbulence transport analyzes in open and forested landscapes.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published.
Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.