Henriikka Mälkönen, Jukka Lehtonen, Pauli Pöyhönen, Valtteri Uusitalo, Mikko I. Mäyränpää, Markku Kupari
{"title":"心内膜肌活检在心脏结节病诊断中的应用","authors":"Henriikka Mälkönen, Jukka Lehtonen, Pauli Pöyhönen, Valtteri Uusitalo, Mikko I. Mäyränpää, Markku Kupari","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.3545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimsWe set out to assess the utility of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Historically, EMB sensitivity in CS is only ≤25%, but comprehensive analyses of its current diagnostic performance are not available.Methods and resultsThe data of 260 consecutive patients with <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CS</jats:styled-content> (mean age 49 years, 60% female) meeting the Heart Rhythm Society diagnostic criteria were analysed retrospectively. Overall, 216 patients (83%) had undergone <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">EMB</jats:styled-content>, 47 with repeat procedures. <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">EMB</jats:styled-content> overall sensitivity was 38%, rising to 49% after repeat biopsies. On logistic regression analysis, positive <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">EMB</jats:styled-content> was predicted independently by presentation with ventricular tachyarrhythmia with an odds ratio (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">OR</jats:styled-content>) of 3.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–12.0, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.021), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45% (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">OR</jats:styled-content> 3.7, 95% CI 1.5–9.1, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.004), elevation of cardiac troponins (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">OR</jats:styled-content> 2.7, 95% CI 1.1–6.4, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.024), and presence of late gadolinium enhancement in left ventricular mid‐apical septal segments on magnetic resonance imaging (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">OR</jats:styled-content> 4.1, 95% CI 1.2–13.8, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.024). <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">EMB</jats:styled-content> sensitivity, counting in repeats, was 16% in patients (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 37) without any independent predictor versus 38%, 60%, 79%, and 88% in those with 1 (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 76), 2 (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 62), 3 (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 33), and 4/4 (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 8) predictors, respectively. The rate of serious complications was 0.7% without mortality or permanent harm. Positive <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">EMB</jats:styled-content> was not an independent predictor of prognosis.ConclusionThe sensitivity of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">EMB</jats:styled-content> in <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CS</jats:styled-content> depends on the extent, activity, and location of myocardial involvement, being the higher the more severe <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CS</jats:styled-content> is. Its use should rely on weighing the pre‐test likelihood and individual value of positive biopsy against the procedural risks.","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endomyocardial biopsy in the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis\",\"authors\":\"Henriikka Mälkönen, Jukka Lehtonen, Pauli Pöyhönen, Valtteri Uusitalo, Mikko I. Mäyränpää, Markku Kupari\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejhf.3545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AimsWe set out to assess the utility of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Historically, EMB sensitivity in CS is only ≤25%, but comprehensive analyses of its current diagnostic performance are not available.Methods and resultsThe data of 260 consecutive patients with <jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">CS</jats:styled-content> (mean age 49 years, 60% female) meeting the Heart Rhythm Society diagnostic criteria were analysed retrospectively. Overall, 216 patients (83%) had undergone <jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">EMB</jats:styled-content>, 47 with repeat procedures. <jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">EMB</jats:styled-content> overall sensitivity was 38%, rising to 49% after repeat biopsies. On logistic regression analysis, positive <jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">EMB</jats:styled-content> was predicted independently by presentation with ventricular tachyarrhythmia with an odds ratio (<jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">OR</jats:styled-content>) of 3.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–12.0, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.021), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45% (<jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">OR</jats:styled-content> 3.7, 95% CI 1.5–9.1, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.004), elevation of cardiac troponins (<jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">OR</jats:styled-content> 2.7, 95% CI 1.1–6.4, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.024), and presence of late gadolinium enhancement in left ventricular mid‐apical septal segments on magnetic resonance imaging (<jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">OR</jats:styled-content> 4.1, 95% CI 1.2–13.8, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.024). <jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">EMB</jats:styled-content> sensitivity, counting in repeats, was 16% in patients (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 37) without any independent predictor versus 38%, 60%, 79%, and 88% in those with 1 (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 76), 2 (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 62), 3 (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 33), and 4/4 (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 8) predictors, respectively. The rate of serious complications was 0.7% without mortality or permanent harm. Positive <jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">EMB</jats:styled-content> was not an independent predictor of prognosis.ConclusionThe sensitivity of <jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">EMB</jats:styled-content> in <jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">CS</jats:styled-content> depends on the extent, activity, and location of myocardial involvement, being the higher the more severe <jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">CS</jats:styled-content> is. Its use should rely on weighing the pre‐test likelihood and individual value of positive biopsy against the procedural risks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3545\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3545","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:我们开始评估心肌内膜活检(EMB)在心脏结节病(CS)中的应用。从历史上看,EMB在CS中的敏感性仅≤25%,但目前还没有对其诊断性能的全面分析。方法与结果对符合心律学会诊断标准的连续260例CS患者(平均年龄49岁,60%为女性)的资料进行回顾性分析。总的来说,216名患者(83%)接受了EMB, 47名患者接受了重复手术。EMB的总体敏感性为38%,在重复活检后上升至49%。在logistic回归分析中,EMB阳性的独立预测是:表现为室性心动过速,比值比(OR)为3.8(95%可信区间[CI] 1.2-12.0, p = 0.021),左心室射血分数≤45% (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.5-9.1, p = 0.004),心肌肌钙蛋白升高(OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.1-6.4, p = 0.024),磁共振成像显示左心室中尖间隔段晚期钆增强(OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.2-13.8, p = 0.024)。P = 0.024)。以重复数计算,无独立预测因子的患者(n = 37)的EMB敏感性为16%,而有1 (n = 76)、2 (n = 62)、3 (n = 33)和4/4 (n = 8)预测因子的患者的EMB敏感性分别为38%、60%、79%和88%。严重并发症发生率为0.7%,无死亡或永久性伤害。EMB阳性不是预后的独立预测因子。结论EMB对CS的敏感性与心肌受累程度、活动程度和部位有关,CS越严重,EMB的敏感性越高。它的使用应该依赖于权衡测试前的可能性和阳性活检的个体价值与程序风险。
Endomyocardial biopsy in the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis
AimsWe set out to assess the utility of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Historically, EMB sensitivity in CS is only ≤25%, but comprehensive analyses of its current diagnostic performance are not available.Methods and resultsThe data of 260 consecutive patients with CS (mean age 49 years, 60% female) meeting the Heart Rhythm Society diagnostic criteria were analysed retrospectively. Overall, 216 patients (83%) had undergone EMB, 47 with repeat procedures. EMB overall sensitivity was 38%, rising to 49% after repeat biopsies. On logistic regression analysis, positive EMB was predicted independently by presentation with ventricular tachyarrhythmia with an odds ratio (OR) of 3.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–12.0, p = 0.021), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45% (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.5–9.1, p = 0.004), elevation of cardiac troponins (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.1–6.4, p = 0.024), and presence of late gadolinium enhancement in left ventricular mid‐apical septal segments on magnetic resonance imaging (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.2–13.8, p = 0.024). EMB sensitivity, counting in repeats, was 16% in patients (n = 37) without any independent predictor versus 38%, 60%, 79%, and 88% in those with 1 (n = 76), 2 (n = 62), 3 (n = 33), and 4/4 (n = 8) predictors, respectively. The rate of serious complications was 0.7% without mortality or permanent harm. Positive EMB was not an independent predictor of prognosis.ConclusionThe sensitivity of EMB in CS depends on the extent, activity, and location of myocardial involvement, being the higher the more severe CS is. Its use should rely on weighing the pre‐test likelihood and individual value of positive biopsy against the procedural risks.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Heart Failure is an international journal dedicated to advancing knowledge in the field of heart failure management. The journal publishes reviews and editorials aimed at improving understanding, prevention, investigation, and treatment of heart failure. It covers various disciplines such as molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, clinical sciences, social sciences, and population sciences. The journal welcomes submissions of manuscripts on basic, clinical, and population sciences, as well as original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics, and other related specialist fields. It is published monthly and has a readership that includes cardiologists, emergency room physicians, intensivists, internists, general physicians, cardiac nurses, diabetologists, epidemiologists, basic scientists focusing on cardiovascular research, and those working in rehabilitation. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Academic Search, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Science Citation Index.