{"title":"高密度城区口袋公园的活力。西南地区用户视角下的评价体系","authors":"Geng Ma , Paola Pellegrini , Huiqing Han","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>When concentration increases and urban land prices rise, the realization of urban parks can be difficult in new developments as well as in established areas. The scarcity of urban parks causes the decrease of residents’ accessibility to green sites, contributing to the increase of recreational and health issues. In response, pocket parks have emerged as a viable and effective solution in high-density urban conditions due to low construction costs, easy accessibility, potential widespread distribution. Although research on pocket parks is growing, very few studies propose an assessment system of pocket parks tailored to the characteristics of Chinese users. This paper explores pocket parks in high-density neighborhoods in the main cities of Southwest China and develops a system for evaluating parks' vitality from the users' perspective. The main data source are on-site observation of the activity patterns of park users, interviews on users’ experiences and perceptions of park spaces, questionnaires distributed within a representative sample of pocket parks. The research findings highlight that facilities are the elements which influence the usage of pocket parks the most, surpassing natural elements, articulation of the spaces, and location. Pocket parks, in fact, primarily provide residents with venues for daily exercise and leisure opportunities. Low-income groups are especially active participants in park’s activities. The findings allow to propose some design elements for improving the parks’ effectiveness, such as a balance between ecological benefits and functional utility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 128596"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The vitality of pocket parks in high-density urban areas. An evaluation system from the users' perspective in Southwest China\",\"authors\":\"Geng Ma , Paola Pellegrini , Huiqing Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>When concentration increases and urban land prices rise, the realization of urban parks can be difficult in new developments as well as in established areas. The scarcity of urban parks causes the decrease of residents’ accessibility to green sites, contributing to the increase of recreational and health issues. In response, pocket parks have emerged as a viable and effective solution in high-density urban conditions due to low construction costs, easy accessibility, potential widespread distribution. Although research on pocket parks is growing, very few studies propose an assessment system of pocket parks tailored to the characteristics of Chinese users. This paper explores pocket parks in high-density neighborhoods in the main cities of Southwest China and develops a system for evaluating parks' vitality from the users' perspective. The main data source are on-site observation of the activity patterns of park users, interviews on users’ experiences and perceptions of park spaces, questionnaires distributed within a representative sample of pocket parks. The research findings highlight that facilities are the elements which influence the usage of pocket parks the most, surpassing natural elements, articulation of the spaces, and location. Pocket parks, in fact, primarily provide residents with venues for daily exercise and leisure opportunities. Low-income groups are especially active participants in park’s activities. The findings allow to propose some design elements for improving the parks’ effectiveness, such as a balance between ecological benefits and functional utility.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"volume\":\"104 \",\"pages\":\"Article 128596\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866724003947\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866724003947","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The vitality of pocket parks in high-density urban areas. An evaluation system from the users' perspective in Southwest China
When concentration increases and urban land prices rise, the realization of urban parks can be difficult in new developments as well as in established areas. The scarcity of urban parks causes the decrease of residents’ accessibility to green sites, contributing to the increase of recreational and health issues. In response, pocket parks have emerged as a viable and effective solution in high-density urban conditions due to low construction costs, easy accessibility, potential widespread distribution. Although research on pocket parks is growing, very few studies propose an assessment system of pocket parks tailored to the characteristics of Chinese users. This paper explores pocket parks in high-density neighborhoods in the main cities of Southwest China and develops a system for evaluating parks' vitality from the users' perspective. The main data source are on-site observation of the activity patterns of park users, interviews on users’ experiences and perceptions of park spaces, questionnaires distributed within a representative sample of pocket parks. The research findings highlight that facilities are the elements which influence the usage of pocket parks the most, surpassing natural elements, articulation of the spaces, and location. Pocket parks, in fact, primarily provide residents with venues for daily exercise and leisure opportunities. Low-income groups are especially active participants in park’s activities. The findings allow to propose some design elements for improving the parks’ effectiveness, such as a balance between ecological benefits and functional utility.
期刊介绍:
Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries.
The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects:
-Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology.
-Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation.
-Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments.
-Management of urban forests and other vegetation.
Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.