桡骨远端骨折手术患者活动与活动的有效性:一项单盲、随机对照研究。

Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) Pub Date : 2024-12-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1806-9282.20241190
Levent Horoz, Basak Cigdem-Karacay, Ismail Ceylan, Halil Alkan
{"title":"桡骨远端骨折手术患者活动与活动的有效性:一项单盲、随机对照研究。","authors":"Levent Horoz, Basak Cigdem-Karacay, Ismail Ceylan, Halil Alkan","doi":"10.1590/1806-9282.20241190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the use of Mulligan's mobilization with movement technique in patients who underwent surgery for distal radius fracture. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of adding Mulligan's mobilization with movement to the conventional exercise program for those who underwent open reduction and volar plate application due to distal radius fracture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled, single-blind study was conducted with 53 patients who had been operated on for distal radius fracture. The patients were divided into two groups, the mobilization with movement group and the control group. Patients in the mobilization with movement group were mobilized using Mulligan's mobilization with movement technique in addition to the rehabilitation program used in the control group. The degree of volar inclination and radial inclination were recorded. Radial height was measured in millimeters. Ulnar variance was recorded. Perimeter was measured using the Figure of Eight method. The range of motion of the joint was measured by goniometry. Hand grip strength was measured with Jamar® hand dynamometer, and pinch grip was measured with a pinch meter. The Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire was used to assess functionality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is no statistically significant difference identified between the groups (p>0.05). The intra-group changes in the data of the groups were found to be statistically significant in visual analog scale, range of motion, pinch grip, hand grip, and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation parameters (p<0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the mobilization with movement group and the control group for pronation value and hand grip strength value in measurements (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>XThe mobilization with movement had no additive effect on parameters other than hand grip strength and pronation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94194,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)","volume":"70 11","pages":"e20241190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11639520/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of mobilization with movement in patients operated for distal radius fracture: a single-blinded, randomized controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Levent Horoz, Basak Cigdem-Karacay, Ismail Ceylan, Halil Alkan\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1806-9282.20241190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the use of Mulligan's mobilization with movement technique in patients who underwent surgery for distal radius fracture. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of adding Mulligan's mobilization with movement to the conventional exercise program for those who underwent open reduction and volar plate application due to distal radius fracture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled, single-blind study was conducted with 53 patients who had been operated on for distal radius fracture. The patients were divided into two groups, the mobilization with movement group and the control group. Patients in the mobilization with movement group were mobilized using Mulligan's mobilization with movement technique in addition to the rehabilitation program used in the control group. The degree of volar inclination and radial inclination were recorded. Radial height was measured in millimeters. Ulnar variance was recorded. Perimeter was measured using the Figure of Eight method. The range of motion of the joint was measured by goniometry. Hand grip strength was measured with Jamar® hand dynamometer, and pinch grip was measured with a pinch meter. The Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire was used to assess functionality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is no statistically significant difference identified between the groups (p>0.05). The intra-group changes in the data of the groups were found to be statistically significant in visual analog scale, range of motion, pinch grip, hand grip, and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation parameters (p<0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the mobilization with movement group and the control group for pronation value and hand grip strength value in measurements (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>XThe mobilization with movement had no additive effect on parameters other than hand grip strength and pronation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)\",\"volume\":\"70 11\",\"pages\":\"e20241190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11639520/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20241190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20241190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:背景:在桡骨远端骨折手术患者中使用Mulligan活动技术的数据有限。目的:本研究旨在评估由于桡骨远端骨折接受切开复位和掌侧钢板应用的患者在常规运动方案中增加Mulligan活动的有效性。方法:对53例桡骨远端骨折手术患者进行随机对照、单盲研究。将患者分为两组,带运动动员组和对照组。活动组患者在对照组康复方案的基础上,采用Mulligan's活动技术进行活动。记录掌侧倾角和桡侧倾角。径向高度以毫米为单位测量。记录尺侧方差。周长采用八字形法测量。关节的运动范围用角测量法测量。握力用Jamar®手测力仪测量,握力用捏计测量。采用患者评定腕关节评估问卷来评估腕关节功能。结果:两组间比较差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。各组数据的组内变化在视觉模拟量表、运动范围、捏握、手握和患者评定腕关节评价参数上均有统计学意义(p结论:x随运动的移动对除手握力和旋前外的其他参数无加性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of mobilization with movement in patients operated for distal radius fracture: a single-blinded, randomized controlled study.

Objective: BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the use of Mulligan's mobilization with movement technique in patients who underwent surgery for distal radius fracture. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of adding Mulligan's mobilization with movement to the conventional exercise program for those who underwent open reduction and volar plate application due to distal radius fracture.

Methods: This randomized controlled, single-blind study was conducted with 53 patients who had been operated on for distal radius fracture. The patients were divided into two groups, the mobilization with movement group and the control group. Patients in the mobilization with movement group were mobilized using Mulligan's mobilization with movement technique in addition to the rehabilitation program used in the control group. The degree of volar inclination and radial inclination were recorded. Radial height was measured in millimeters. Ulnar variance was recorded. Perimeter was measured using the Figure of Eight method. The range of motion of the joint was measured by goniometry. Hand grip strength was measured with Jamar® hand dynamometer, and pinch grip was measured with a pinch meter. The Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire was used to assess functionality.

Results: There is no statistically significant difference identified between the groups (p>0.05). The intra-group changes in the data of the groups were found to be statistically significant in visual analog scale, range of motion, pinch grip, hand grip, and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation parameters (p<0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the mobilization with movement group and the control group for pronation value and hand grip strength value in measurements (p<0.05).

Conclusions: XThe mobilization with movement had no additive effect on parameters other than hand grip strength and pronation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信