患者护理体验指数:一种新的、可靠的、有用的腰椎手术问卷。

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain & spine Pub Date : 2024-11-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bas.2024.104140
Arkan Sam Sayed Noor, Björn Knutsson
{"title":"患者护理体验指数:一种新的、可靠的、有用的腰椎手术问卷。","authors":"Arkan Sam Sayed Noor, Björn Knutsson","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2024.104140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient's experience of care (PEC) is crucial in enhancing and sustaining healthcare quality.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>the primary aim of this study is to establish and assess a new questionnaire index designed to measure PEC following elective spinal surgery. This index serves as a tool to document, enhance, and maintain the quality of healthcare provided in this context.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The studied PEC index comprises 7 questions, each addressing different aspects of perioperative care. Our study involved 300 post-spinal surgery patients, sourced from the Swedish national register for spine surgery. Collected data included age, gender, education level, self-rated health, and primary language. The patients were contacted via telephone by trained interviewers, approximately 35 days after their surgery (with 60 patients re-interviewed after a few weeks). We employed linear regression, <i>t</i>-test, and ANOVA models to examine the associations between the PEC index and the documented variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PEC index demonstrated good internal consistency and reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.76, interclass correlation coefficient = 0.87). Additionally, the utility measures indicated associations between the PEC index and factors such as higher age (p = 0.014), male gender (p = 0.012), and better self-rated health (p = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The PEC index seems to be a promising tool with a clinically useful composite questionnaire for assessing PEC in patients undergoing elective spine surgery. In clinical settings, the index can accompany other outcome scores to evaluate and compare different diagnoses and management methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"4 ","pages":"104140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients' experience of care index: A new, reliable, and useful questionnaire in lumbar spine surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Arkan Sam Sayed Noor, Björn Knutsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bas.2024.104140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient's experience of care (PEC) is crucial in enhancing and sustaining healthcare quality.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>the primary aim of this study is to establish and assess a new questionnaire index designed to measure PEC following elective spinal surgery. This index serves as a tool to document, enhance, and maintain the quality of healthcare provided in this context.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The studied PEC index comprises 7 questions, each addressing different aspects of perioperative care. Our study involved 300 post-spinal surgery patients, sourced from the Swedish national register for spine surgery. Collected data included age, gender, education level, self-rated health, and primary language. The patients were contacted via telephone by trained interviewers, approximately 35 days after their surgery (with 60 patients re-interviewed after a few weeks). We employed linear regression, <i>t</i>-test, and ANOVA models to examine the associations between the PEC index and the documented variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PEC index demonstrated good internal consistency and reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.76, interclass correlation coefficient = 0.87). Additionally, the utility measures indicated associations between the PEC index and factors such as higher age (p = 0.014), male gender (p = 0.012), and better self-rated health (p = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The PEC index seems to be a promising tool with a clinically useful composite questionnaire for assessing PEC in patients undergoing elective spine surgery. In clinical settings, the index can accompany other outcome scores to evaluate and compare different diagnoses and management methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain & spine\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"104140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616567/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain & spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2024.104140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2024.104140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患者的护理经验(PEC)是提高和维持医疗质量的关键。研究问题:本研究的主要目的是建立和评估一种新的问卷指数,用于测量选择性脊柱手术后的PEC。该指数可作为记录、提高和保持在这种情况下提供的医疗保健质量的工具。材料与方法:研究的PEC指数包括7个问题,每个问题涉及围手术期护理的不同方面。我们的研究涉及300名脊柱术后患者,来自瑞典国家脊柱外科登记。收集的数据包括年龄、性别、受教育程度、自评健康状况和主要语言。手术后约35天,接受过培训的采访者通过电话与患者联系(60名患者在几周后再次接受采访)。我们采用线性回归、t检验和方差分析模型来检验PEC指数与文献变量之间的关系。结果:PEC指标具有良好的内部一致性和信度(Cronbach α = 0.76,类间相关系数= 0.87)。此外,效用测量表明PEC指数与年龄较大(p = 0.014)、男性性别(p = 0.012)和更好的自评健康(p = 0.011)等因素之间存在关联。讨论与结论:PEC指数似乎是一种很有前途的工具,它是一种临床有用的复合问卷,用于评估选择性脊柱手术患者的PEC。在临床设置中,该指数可以与其他结果评分一起评估和比较不同的诊断和管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patients' experience of care index: A new, reliable, and useful questionnaire in lumbar spine surgery.

Introduction: Patient's experience of care (PEC) is crucial in enhancing and sustaining healthcare quality.

Research question: the primary aim of this study is to establish and assess a new questionnaire index designed to measure PEC following elective spinal surgery. This index serves as a tool to document, enhance, and maintain the quality of healthcare provided in this context.

Material and methods: The studied PEC index comprises 7 questions, each addressing different aspects of perioperative care. Our study involved 300 post-spinal surgery patients, sourced from the Swedish national register for spine surgery. Collected data included age, gender, education level, self-rated health, and primary language. The patients were contacted via telephone by trained interviewers, approximately 35 days after their surgery (with 60 patients re-interviewed after a few weeks). We employed linear regression, t-test, and ANOVA models to examine the associations between the PEC index and the documented variables.

Results: The PEC index demonstrated good internal consistency and reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.76, interclass correlation coefficient = 0.87). Additionally, the utility measures indicated associations between the PEC index and factors such as higher age (p = 0.014), male gender (p = 0.012), and better self-rated health (p = 0.011).

Discussion and conclusion: The PEC index seems to be a promising tool with a clinically useful composite questionnaire for assessing PEC in patients undergoing elective spine surgery. In clinical settings, the index can accompany other outcome scores to evaluate and compare different diagnoses and management methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信