[Pembrolizumab治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌
安全性和有效性的现实研究]。

Q4 Medicine
Ning Wan, Bing Wang, Ya Guo, Zijian He, Chen Yang, Ning Yang, Liqing Lu, Hongyi Liang, Weibin Xiao, Dandan Yang, Zhuojia Chen, Wenfeng Fang, Weiting Liang
{"title":"[Pembrolizumab治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌\u2029安全性和有效性的现实研究]。","authors":"Ning Wan, Bing Wang, Ya Guo, Zijian He, Chen Yang, Ning Yang, Liqing Lu, Hongyi Liang, Weibin Xiao, Dandan Yang, Zhuojia Chen, Wenfeng Fang, Weiting Liang","doi":"10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.106.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pembrolizumab (PEM) has been shown to be effective in clinical trials for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but clinical trials were based on cohorts of patients selected on specific criteria, and whether the findings are consistent with real-world patients is debatable. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PEM in the treatment of advanced NSCLC based on real-world data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective collection of real-world data from patients with advanced NSCLC receiving PEM was conducted. Propensity score matching was used to eliminate inter-group differences and assess the efficacy and safety of PEM compared to chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 450 matched patients, the incidence rates of any-grade adverse events were 79.87% in the PEM group and 86.71% in the chemotherapy group, while the incidence rates of grade ≥3 adverse events were 4.03% and 7.31%, respectively. The objective response rates were 48.63% for PEM and 36.00% for chemotherapy (P=0.011). The median progression-free survival was 15.5 months for PEM and 8.8 months for chemotherapy (P<0.001), and the median overall survival was not reached for PEM and 26.2 months for chemotherapy (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PEM treatment for advanced NSCLC demonstrates favorable survival outcomes and acceptable safety in real-world clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":39317,"journal":{"name":"中国肺癌杂志","volume":"27 10","pages":"745-754"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Real-world Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in the Treatment \\u2029of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].\",\"authors\":\"Ning Wan, Bing Wang, Ya Guo, Zijian He, Chen Yang, Ning Yang, Liqing Lu, Hongyi Liang, Weibin Xiao, Dandan Yang, Zhuojia Chen, Wenfeng Fang, Weiting Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.106.29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pembrolizumab (PEM) has been shown to be effective in clinical trials for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but clinical trials were based on cohorts of patients selected on specific criteria, and whether the findings are consistent with real-world patients is debatable. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PEM in the treatment of advanced NSCLC based on real-world data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective collection of real-world data from patients with advanced NSCLC receiving PEM was conducted. Propensity score matching was used to eliminate inter-group differences and assess the efficacy and safety of PEM compared to chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 450 matched patients, the incidence rates of any-grade adverse events were 79.87% in the PEM group and 86.71% in the chemotherapy group, while the incidence rates of grade ≥3 adverse events were 4.03% and 7.31%, respectively. The objective response rates were 48.63% for PEM and 36.00% for chemotherapy (P=0.011). The median progression-free survival was 15.5 months for PEM and 8.8 months for chemotherapy (P<0.001), and the median overall survival was not reached for PEM and 26.2 months for chemotherapy (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PEM treatment for advanced NSCLC demonstrates favorable survival outcomes and acceptable safety in real-world clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国肺癌杂志\",\"volume\":\"27 10\",\"pages\":\"745-754\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629088/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国肺癌杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.106.29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国肺癌杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.106.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Pembrolizumab (PEM)在治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床试验中已被证明是有效的,但临床试验是基于特定标准选择的患者队列,研究结果是否与现实世界的患者一致是有争议的。本研究的目的是基于真实数据评估PEM治疗晚期NSCLC的有效性和安全性。方法:回顾性收集接受PEM的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的真实数据。倾向评分匹配用于消除组间差异,并评估PEM与化疗相比的有效性和安全性。结果:450例匹配患者中,PEM组任意级别不良事件发生率为79.87%,化疗组为86.71%,≥3级不良事件发生率分别为4.03%和7.31%。PEM组和化疗组的客观有效率分别为48.63%和36.00% (P=0.011)。PEM治疗的中位无进展生存期为15.5个月,化疗的中位无进展生存期为8.8个月(结论:PEM治疗晚期NSCLC在实际临床实践中表现出良好的生存结果和可接受的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Real-world Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in the Treatment 
of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].

Background: Pembrolizumab (PEM) has been shown to be effective in clinical trials for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but clinical trials were based on cohorts of patients selected on specific criteria, and whether the findings are consistent with real-world patients is debatable. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PEM in the treatment of advanced NSCLC based on real-world data.

Methods: A retrospective collection of real-world data from patients with advanced NSCLC receiving PEM was conducted. Propensity score matching was used to eliminate inter-group differences and assess the efficacy and safety of PEM compared to chemotherapy.

Results: Among 450 matched patients, the incidence rates of any-grade adverse events were 79.87% in the PEM group and 86.71% in the chemotherapy group, while the incidence rates of grade ≥3 adverse events were 4.03% and 7.31%, respectively. The objective response rates were 48.63% for PEM and 36.00% for chemotherapy (P=0.011). The median progression-free survival was 15.5 months for PEM and 8.8 months for chemotherapy (P<0.001), and the median overall survival was not reached for PEM and 26.2 months for chemotherapy (P<0.001).

Conclusions: PEM treatment for advanced NSCLC demonstrates favorable survival outcomes and acceptable safety in real-world clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中国肺癌杂志
中国肺癌杂志 Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5131
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer(CJLC, pISSN 1009-3419, eISSN 1999-6187), a monthly Open Access journal, is hosted by Chinese Anti-Cancer Association, Chinese Antituberculosis Association, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital. CJLC was indexed in DOAJ, EMBASE/SCOPUS, Chemical Abstract(CA), CSA-Biological Science, HINARI, EBSCO-CINAHL,CABI Abstract, Global Health, CNKI, etc. Editor-in-Chief: Professor Qinghua ZHOU.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信