Ning Wan, Bing Wang, Ya Guo, Zijian He, Chen Yang, Ning Yang, Liqing Lu, Hongyi Liang, Weibin Xiao, Dandan Yang, Zhuojia Chen, Wenfeng Fang, Weiting Liang
{"title":"[Pembrolizumab治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌\u2029安全性和有效性的现实研究]。","authors":"Ning Wan, Bing Wang, Ya Guo, Zijian He, Chen Yang, Ning Yang, Liqing Lu, Hongyi Liang, Weibin Xiao, Dandan Yang, Zhuojia Chen, Wenfeng Fang, Weiting Liang","doi":"10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.106.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pembrolizumab (PEM) has been shown to be effective in clinical trials for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but clinical trials were based on cohorts of patients selected on specific criteria, and whether the findings are consistent with real-world patients is debatable. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PEM in the treatment of advanced NSCLC based on real-world data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective collection of real-world data from patients with advanced NSCLC receiving PEM was conducted. Propensity score matching was used to eliminate inter-group differences and assess the efficacy and safety of PEM compared to chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 450 matched patients, the incidence rates of any-grade adverse events were 79.87% in the PEM group and 86.71% in the chemotherapy group, while the incidence rates of grade ≥3 adverse events were 4.03% and 7.31%, respectively. The objective response rates were 48.63% for PEM and 36.00% for chemotherapy (P=0.011). The median progression-free survival was 15.5 months for PEM and 8.8 months for chemotherapy (P<0.001), and the median overall survival was not reached for PEM and 26.2 months for chemotherapy (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PEM treatment for advanced NSCLC demonstrates favorable survival outcomes and acceptable safety in real-world clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":39317,"journal":{"name":"中国肺癌杂志","volume":"27 10","pages":"745-754"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Real-world Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in the Treatment \\u2029of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].\",\"authors\":\"Ning Wan, Bing Wang, Ya Guo, Zijian He, Chen Yang, Ning Yang, Liqing Lu, Hongyi Liang, Weibin Xiao, Dandan Yang, Zhuojia Chen, Wenfeng Fang, Weiting Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.106.29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pembrolizumab (PEM) has been shown to be effective in clinical trials for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but clinical trials were based on cohorts of patients selected on specific criteria, and whether the findings are consistent with real-world patients is debatable. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PEM in the treatment of advanced NSCLC based on real-world data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective collection of real-world data from patients with advanced NSCLC receiving PEM was conducted. Propensity score matching was used to eliminate inter-group differences and assess the efficacy and safety of PEM compared to chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 450 matched patients, the incidence rates of any-grade adverse events were 79.87% in the PEM group and 86.71% in the chemotherapy group, while the incidence rates of grade ≥3 adverse events were 4.03% and 7.31%, respectively. The objective response rates were 48.63% for PEM and 36.00% for chemotherapy (P=0.011). The median progression-free survival was 15.5 months for PEM and 8.8 months for chemotherapy (P<0.001), and the median overall survival was not reached for PEM and 26.2 months for chemotherapy (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PEM treatment for advanced NSCLC demonstrates favorable survival outcomes and acceptable safety in real-world clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国肺癌杂志\",\"volume\":\"27 10\",\"pages\":\"745-754\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629088/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国肺癌杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.106.29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国肺癌杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.106.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Real-world Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in the Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].
Background: Pembrolizumab (PEM) has been shown to be effective in clinical trials for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but clinical trials were based on cohorts of patients selected on specific criteria, and whether the findings are consistent with real-world patients is debatable. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PEM in the treatment of advanced NSCLC based on real-world data.
Methods: A retrospective collection of real-world data from patients with advanced NSCLC receiving PEM was conducted. Propensity score matching was used to eliminate inter-group differences and assess the efficacy and safety of PEM compared to chemotherapy.
Results: Among 450 matched patients, the incidence rates of any-grade adverse events were 79.87% in the PEM group and 86.71% in the chemotherapy group, while the incidence rates of grade ≥3 adverse events were 4.03% and 7.31%, respectively. The objective response rates were 48.63% for PEM and 36.00% for chemotherapy (P=0.011). The median progression-free survival was 15.5 months for PEM and 8.8 months for chemotherapy (P<0.001), and the median overall survival was not reached for PEM and 26.2 months for chemotherapy (P<0.001).
Conclusions: PEM treatment for advanced NSCLC demonstrates favorable survival outcomes and acceptable safety in real-world clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer(CJLC, pISSN 1009-3419, eISSN 1999-6187), a monthly Open Access journal, is hosted by Chinese Anti-Cancer Association, Chinese Antituberculosis Association, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital. CJLC was indexed in DOAJ, EMBASE/SCOPUS, Chemical Abstract(CA), CSA-Biological Science, HINARI, EBSCO-CINAHL,CABI Abstract, Global Health, CNKI, etc. Editor-in-Chief: Professor Qinghua ZHOU.