医疗补助扩大对可筛查性和非筛查性胃肠道癌症的影响。

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Omid Salehi , Kanishka Uttam Chandani , Cara J. Sammartino , Ponnandai Somasundar , N.Joseph Espat , Abdul Saied Calvino , Steve Kwon
{"title":"医疗补助扩大对可筛查性和非筛查性胃肠道癌症的影响。","authors":"Omid Salehi ,&nbsp;Kanishka Uttam Chandani ,&nbsp;Cara J. Sammartino ,&nbsp;Ponnandai Somasundar ,&nbsp;N.Joseph Espat ,&nbsp;Abdul Saied Calvino ,&nbsp;Steve Kwon","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Medicaid expansion afforded increased healthcare access to low-income Americans contributing to a positive impact on cancer outcomes. However, it is unclear if these benefits were mainly due to enhanced access to cancer screening and earlier diagnosis versus access to cancer treatment</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried between 2010 and 2021 for Medicaid and uninsured patients with GI malignancies. Patients were stratified by screenable (SGI) and non-screenable (NGI) cancers and expansion state (ES) categories: early (EES) and late (LES) adopters, and non-expansion state (NES) cohorts. Statistical analyses, including difference-in-difference (DiD) and adjusted models, assessed the impact of Medicaid expansion on stage at diagnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 230,159 pre-expansion and 539,028 post-expansion patients. There was an increase in Medicaid coverage (14.8 % vs. 11.1 %) and a concomitant decline in the uninsured population (5.3 % vs. 8.2 %) in the post-expansion era. For SGI cancers, Medicaid expansion was associated with significantly lower mean stage at diagnosis (DiD Coef. −0.12; p &lt; 0.01). For NGI cancers, Medicaid expansion was associated with a lower mean stage at diagnosis but with much smaller coefficient (DiD Coef. −0.015; p &lt; 0.01). Comparing EES and LES to NES, EES had more impact on lower mean stage at diagnosis (vs NES DiD Coef. −0.16; p &lt; 0.01) compared to LES (vs NES DiD Coef. −0.02; p = 0.04) for SGI cancers. For NGI cancers, there was a modest reduction in mean stage at diagnosis only for EES (vs NES DiD Coef. −0.04; p &lt; 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Medicaid expansion, particularly for SGI cancers and early adopters, had a profound impact in lowering the mean stage at diagnosis. This emphasizes that long-term advantages of providing access to preventive care and screening, and thus earlier treatment, may be one of the main mechanisms of Medicaid expansion on improving cancer outcomes for GI malignancies.</div></div><div><h3>Policy summary</h3><div>To establish the benefits of Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act 2010 for gastrointestinal cancer patients particularly in screening.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100525"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of medicaid expansion on screenable versus non-screenable gastrointestinal cancers\",\"authors\":\"Omid Salehi ,&nbsp;Kanishka Uttam Chandani ,&nbsp;Cara J. Sammartino ,&nbsp;Ponnandai Somasundar ,&nbsp;N.Joseph Espat ,&nbsp;Abdul Saied Calvino ,&nbsp;Steve Kwon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Medicaid expansion afforded increased healthcare access to low-income Americans contributing to a positive impact on cancer outcomes. However, it is unclear if these benefits were mainly due to enhanced access to cancer screening and earlier diagnosis versus access to cancer treatment</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried between 2010 and 2021 for Medicaid and uninsured patients with GI malignancies. Patients were stratified by screenable (SGI) and non-screenable (NGI) cancers and expansion state (ES) categories: early (EES) and late (LES) adopters, and non-expansion state (NES) cohorts. Statistical analyses, including difference-in-difference (DiD) and adjusted models, assessed the impact of Medicaid expansion on stage at diagnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 230,159 pre-expansion and 539,028 post-expansion patients. There was an increase in Medicaid coverage (14.8 % vs. 11.1 %) and a concomitant decline in the uninsured population (5.3 % vs. 8.2 %) in the post-expansion era. For SGI cancers, Medicaid expansion was associated with significantly lower mean stage at diagnosis (DiD Coef. −0.12; p &lt; 0.01). For NGI cancers, Medicaid expansion was associated with a lower mean stage at diagnosis but with much smaller coefficient (DiD Coef. −0.015; p &lt; 0.01). Comparing EES and LES to NES, EES had more impact on lower mean stage at diagnosis (vs NES DiD Coef. −0.16; p &lt; 0.01) compared to LES (vs NES DiD Coef. −0.02; p = 0.04) for SGI cancers. For NGI cancers, there was a modest reduction in mean stage at diagnosis only for EES (vs NES DiD Coef. −0.04; p &lt; 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Medicaid expansion, particularly for SGI cancers and early adopters, had a profound impact in lowering the mean stage at diagnosis. This emphasizes that long-term advantages of providing access to preventive care and screening, and thus earlier treatment, may be one of the main mechanisms of Medicaid expansion on improving cancer outcomes for GI malignancies.</div></div><div><h3>Policy summary</h3><div>To establish the benefits of Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act 2010 for gastrointestinal cancer patients particularly in screening.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Policy\",\"volume\":\"43 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100525\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538324000596\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538324000596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗补助扩大为低收入美国人提供了更多的医疗保健机会,对癌症治疗结果产生了积极影响。然而,目前尚不清楚这些益处是否主要是由于癌症筛查和早期诊断的增加,而不是癌症治疗的增加。方法:在2010-2021年期间,对国家癌症数据库(NCDB)中医疗补助和未投保的胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者进行了查询。患者按可筛查(SGI)和不可筛查(NGI)癌症和扩展状态(ES)类别进行分层:早期(EES)和晚期(LES)采用者,以及非扩展状态(NES)队列。统计分析,包括差异中的差异(DiD)和调整模型,评估了医疗补助扩大对诊断阶段的影响。结果:扩术前230159例,扩后539028例。在后经济扩张时代,医疗补助覆盖率有所增加(14.8%对11.1%),未参保人口也随之下降(5.3%对8.2%)。对于SGI癌症,医疗补助扩大与较低的平均诊断期(DiD系数)显著相关。-0.12;结论:医疗补助的扩大,特别是对于SGI癌症和早期患者,对降低诊断的平均阶段有深远的影响。这强调了提供预防保健和筛查的长期优势,从而早期治疗,可能是医疗补助扩大改善胃肠道恶性肿瘤癌症结局的主要机制之一。政策总结:根据《2010年平价医疗法案》,确定医疗补助扩大对胃肠道癌症患者的好处,特别是在筛查方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of medicaid expansion on screenable versus non-screenable gastrointestinal cancers

Background

Medicaid expansion afforded increased healthcare access to low-income Americans contributing to a positive impact on cancer outcomes. However, it is unclear if these benefits were mainly due to enhanced access to cancer screening and earlier diagnosis versus access to cancer treatment

Methods

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried between 2010 and 2021 for Medicaid and uninsured patients with GI malignancies. Patients were stratified by screenable (SGI) and non-screenable (NGI) cancers and expansion state (ES) categories: early (EES) and late (LES) adopters, and non-expansion state (NES) cohorts. Statistical analyses, including difference-in-difference (DiD) and adjusted models, assessed the impact of Medicaid expansion on stage at diagnosis.

Results

There were 230,159 pre-expansion and 539,028 post-expansion patients. There was an increase in Medicaid coverage (14.8 % vs. 11.1 %) and a concomitant decline in the uninsured population (5.3 % vs. 8.2 %) in the post-expansion era. For SGI cancers, Medicaid expansion was associated with significantly lower mean stage at diagnosis (DiD Coef. −0.12; p < 0.01). For NGI cancers, Medicaid expansion was associated with a lower mean stage at diagnosis but with much smaller coefficient (DiD Coef. −0.015; p < 0.01). Comparing EES and LES to NES, EES had more impact on lower mean stage at diagnosis (vs NES DiD Coef. −0.16; p < 0.01) compared to LES (vs NES DiD Coef. −0.02; p = 0.04) for SGI cancers. For NGI cancers, there was a modest reduction in mean stage at diagnosis only for EES (vs NES DiD Coef. −0.04; p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Medicaid expansion, particularly for SGI cancers and early adopters, had a profound impact in lowering the mean stage at diagnosis. This emphasizes that long-term advantages of providing access to preventive care and screening, and thus earlier treatment, may be one of the main mechanisms of Medicaid expansion on improving cancer outcomes for GI malignancies.

Policy summary

To establish the benefits of Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act 2010 for gastrointestinal cancer patients particularly in screening.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Policy
Journal of Cancer Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
65 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信