6%羟乙基淀粉和2%利多卡因减轻异丙酚注射疼痛的疗效:一项随机、安慰剂对照试验。

Q3 Medicine
Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-27 DOI:10.18295/squmj.11.2024.071
Tapan K Sahoo, Saurabh Trivedi, Monika Pedhadiva, Seema Gupta, Gaurav Trivedi
{"title":"6%羟乙基淀粉和2%利多卡因减轻异丙酚注射疼痛的疗效:一项随机、安慰剂对照试验。","authors":"Tapan K Sahoo, Saurabh Trivedi, Monika Pedhadiva, Seema Gupta, Gaurav Trivedi","doi":"10.18295/squmj.11.2024.071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Propofol administration is associated with pain, mediated by the activation of vascular endothelium. Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) inhibits endothelial membrane activation by various nociceptive substances. Thus, this study hypothesised that pre-administration of HES can reduce pain on propofol administration. This study aimed to compare the proportion of patients with no pain on propofol administration and to compare the severity of pain and any change in pre- and post-induction haemodynamic variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted at Chirayu Medical College & Hospital, Bhopal, India, between August 2023 and December 2023 and included patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups to receive either 100 mL of 6% HES followed by propofol (Group HES), 100 mL normal saline (NS) followed by propofol premixed with 2% lidocaine (Group L) or 100 mL NS followed by propofol induction (Group P).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 339 patients were included. The proportion of patients with no pain on propofol injection was significantly higher in the HES group (n = 75) than in the lignocaine (n = 33) and placebo (n = 13) groups (<i>P</i> <0.0001 each). The median pain scores were 0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0-1), 1 (IQR: 0-1) and 2 (IQR: 2-3) in the HES, lignocaine and placebo groups, respectively. The proportion of patients with moderate (n = 44) and severe (n = 48) pain scores was significantly higher in the placebo group than in the HES and lignocaine groups (<i>P</i> <0.0001 each).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proportion of patients experiencing pain on propofol injection was found to be significantly less with the pre-administration of 100 mL 6% HES compared to the pre-administration of lidocaine.</p>","PeriodicalId":22083,"journal":{"name":"Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal","volume":"24 4","pages":"556-561"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11614019/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl Starch and 2% Lidocaine in Reducing the Pain of Propofol Injection: A randomised, placebo-controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Tapan K Sahoo, Saurabh Trivedi, Monika Pedhadiva, Seema Gupta, Gaurav Trivedi\",\"doi\":\"10.18295/squmj.11.2024.071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Propofol administration is associated with pain, mediated by the activation of vascular endothelium. Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) inhibits endothelial membrane activation by various nociceptive substances. Thus, this study hypothesised that pre-administration of HES can reduce pain on propofol administration. This study aimed to compare the proportion of patients with no pain on propofol administration and to compare the severity of pain and any change in pre- and post-induction haemodynamic variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted at Chirayu Medical College & Hospital, Bhopal, India, between August 2023 and December 2023 and included patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups to receive either 100 mL of 6% HES followed by propofol (Group HES), 100 mL normal saline (NS) followed by propofol premixed with 2% lidocaine (Group L) or 100 mL NS followed by propofol induction (Group P).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 339 patients were included. The proportion of patients with no pain on propofol injection was significantly higher in the HES group (n = 75) than in the lignocaine (n = 33) and placebo (n = 13) groups (<i>P</i> <0.0001 each). The median pain scores were 0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0-1), 1 (IQR: 0-1) and 2 (IQR: 2-3) in the HES, lignocaine and placebo groups, respectively. The proportion of patients with moderate (n = 44) and severe (n = 48) pain scores was significantly higher in the placebo group than in the HES and lignocaine groups (<i>P</i> <0.0001 each).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proportion of patients experiencing pain on propofol injection was found to be significantly less with the pre-administration of 100 mL 6% HES compared to the pre-administration of lidocaine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"24 4\",\"pages\":\"556-561\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11614019/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18295/squmj.11.2024.071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18295/squmj.11.2024.071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:异丙酚给药与血管内皮活化介导的疼痛有关。羟乙基淀粉(HES)抑制内皮膜被各种伤害性物质激活。因此,本研究假设HES预给药可以减轻异丙酚给药后的疼痛。本研究旨在比较异丙酚给药后无疼痛的患者比例,比较疼痛的严重程度和诱导前后血流动力学变量的任何变化。方法:这项前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照临床试验于2023年8月至2023年12月在印度博帕尔Chirayu医学院和医院进行,包括在全身麻醉下进行择期手术的患者。将患者随机分为3组,分别给予100 mL 6% HES +异丙酚(HES组)、100 mL生理盐水(NS) + 2%利多卡因预混异丙酚(L组)或100 mL NS +异丙酚诱导(P组)。结果:共纳入339例患者。HES组无疼痛患者比例(n = 75)明显高于利多卡因组(n = 33)和安慰剂组(n = 13) (P = P)结论:与利多卡因组相比,100 mL 6% HES预给药后异丙酚组无疼痛患者比例明显减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl Starch and 2% Lidocaine in Reducing the Pain of Propofol Injection: A randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Objectives: Propofol administration is associated with pain, mediated by the activation of vascular endothelium. Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) inhibits endothelial membrane activation by various nociceptive substances. Thus, this study hypothesised that pre-administration of HES can reduce pain on propofol administration. This study aimed to compare the proportion of patients with no pain on propofol administration and to compare the severity of pain and any change in pre- and post-induction haemodynamic variables.

Methods: This prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted at Chirayu Medical College & Hospital, Bhopal, India, between August 2023 and December 2023 and included patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups to receive either 100 mL of 6% HES followed by propofol (Group HES), 100 mL normal saline (NS) followed by propofol premixed with 2% lidocaine (Group L) or 100 mL NS followed by propofol induction (Group P).

Results: A total of 339 patients were included. The proportion of patients with no pain on propofol injection was significantly higher in the HES group (n = 75) than in the lignocaine (n = 33) and placebo (n = 13) groups (P <0.0001 each). The median pain scores were 0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0-1), 1 (IQR: 0-1) and 2 (IQR: 2-3) in the HES, lignocaine and placebo groups, respectively. The proportion of patients with moderate (n = 44) and severe (n = 48) pain scores was significantly higher in the placebo group than in the HES and lignocaine groups (P <0.0001 each).

Conclusion: The proportion of patients experiencing pain on propofol injection was found to be significantly less with the pre-administration of 100 mL 6% HES compared to the pre-administration of lidocaine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信