慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺功能损害与焦虑和抑郁风险之间的关系——系统综述

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Johanne Hermann Karlsen, Kirstine Hermann Jørgensen, Ulla Møller Weinreich
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺功能损害与焦虑和抑郁风险之间的关系——系统综述","authors":"Johanne Hermann Karlsen, Kirstine Hermann Jørgensen, Ulla Møller Weinreich","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02720-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review aims to examine the association between impairment of lung function and risk of anxiety and depression, respectively, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature search were performed 29/01-2024 using Embase and PubMed. Publications reporting association between forced expiratory volume in one second in percentage of expected value (FEV1(%)) and either anxiety or depression or both in patients with COPD were included. The studies were quality assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. The studies were analysed by assessing whether they showed significant results or not, and if they showed a negative or positive association between lung function and risk anxiety or depression and a pooled analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven studies were included in the review, 15 reported anxiety and 31 reported depression, with 9 reporting both outcomes. Most were observational studies. Study population sizes ranged from 40 to 2147 patients. Three studies found a significant negative association between anxiety and FEV1(%), while five studies found a positive non-significant association between anxiety and FEV1(%). Fifteen studies found a significant negative association between FEV1(%) and depression. Especially the studies with larger study population sizes showed significant results. The pooled analysis supported this, as the depression studies showed a significant association between depression and FEV1(%), while the anxiety studies showed part non-significant, part significant associations between anxiety and FEV1(%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review did not support an association between anxiety and impairment of pulmonary function as only 3/15 studies showed significant negative associations, and some studies showed positive associations. This review indicated an association between depression and impairment pulmonary function in patients with COPD, as most studies with a larger study population size showed a significant negative association. Sytematic review registration. PROSPERO 2024 CRD42024506065 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024506065.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"13 1","pages":"300"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616382/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between impairment of lung function and risk of anxiety and depression in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Johanne Hermann Karlsen, Kirstine Hermann Jørgensen, Ulla Møller Weinreich\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13643-024-02720-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review aims to examine the association between impairment of lung function and risk of anxiety and depression, respectively, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature search were performed 29/01-2024 using Embase and PubMed. Publications reporting association between forced expiratory volume in one second in percentage of expected value (FEV1(%)) and either anxiety or depression or both in patients with COPD were included. The studies were quality assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. The studies were analysed by assessing whether they showed significant results or not, and if they showed a negative or positive association between lung function and risk anxiety or depression and a pooled analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven studies were included in the review, 15 reported anxiety and 31 reported depression, with 9 reporting both outcomes. Most were observational studies. Study population sizes ranged from 40 to 2147 patients. Three studies found a significant negative association between anxiety and FEV1(%), while five studies found a positive non-significant association between anxiety and FEV1(%). Fifteen studies found a significant negative association between FEV1(%) and depression. Especially the studies with larger study population sizes showed significant results. The pooled analysis supported this, as the depression studies showed a significant association between depression and FEV1(%), while the anxiety studies showed part non-significant, part significant associations between anxiety and FEV1(%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review did not support an association between anxiety and impairment of pulmonary function as only 3/15 studies showed significant negative associations, and some studies showed positive associations. This review indicated an association between depression and impairment pulmonary function in patients with COPD, as most studies with a larger study population size showed a significant negative association. Sytematic review registration. PROSPERO 2024 CRD42024506065 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024506065.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616382/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02720-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02720-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本系统综述旨在探讨慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者肺功能损害与焦虑和抑郁风险之间的关系。方法:使用Embase和PubMed检索29/01-2024文献。报告COPD患者一秒用力呼气量期望值百分比(FEV1(%))与焦虑或抑郁或两者均有关联的出版物被纳入。这些研究采用纽卡斯尔渥太华量表进行质量评估。对这些研究进行分析,评估它们是否显示出显著的结果,以及它们是否显示出肺功能与焦虑或抑郁风险之间的负相关或正相关,并进行汇总分析。结果:37项研究纳入回顾,15项报告焦虑,31项报告抑郁,其中9项报告两种结果。大多数是观察性研究。研究人群规模从40到2147例不等。三项研究发现焦虑与FEV1之间存在显著负相关(%),而五项研究发现焦虑与FEV1之间存在显著正相关(%)。15项研究发现FEV1(%)与抑郁症之间存在显著的负相关。特别是研究人群规模较大的研究显示出显著的结果。合并分析支持这一观点,因为抑郁研究显示抑郁与FEV1之间存在显著关联(%),而焦虑研究显示焦虑与FEV1之间存在部分不显著或部分显著的关联(%)。结论:本系统综述不支持焦虑与肺功能损害之间的关联,只有3/15的研究显示出显著的负相关,一些研究显示出正相关。这篇综述表明,COPD患者的抑郁与肺功能损害之间存在关联,因为大多数研究人群规模较大的研究显示两者存在显著的负相关。系统评审注册。普洛斯彼罗2024 CRD42024506065可从:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024506065。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between impairment of lung function and risk of anxiety and depression in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-a systematic review.

Background: This systematic review aims to examine the association between impairment of lung function and risk of anxiety and depression, respectively, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Methods: Literature search were performed 29/01-2024 using Embase and PubMed. Publications reporting association between forced expiratory volume in one second in percentage of expected value (FEV1(%)) and either anxiety or depression or both in patients with COPD were included. The studies were quality assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. The studies were analysed by assessing whether they showed significant results or not, and if they showed a negative or positive association between lung function and risk anxiety or depression and a pooled analysis was conducted.

Results: Thirty-seven studies were included in the review, 15 reported anxiety and 31 reported depression, with 9 reporting both outcomes. Most were observational studies. Study population sizes ranged from 40 to 2147 patients. Three studies found a significant negative association between anxiety and FEV1(%), while five studies found a positive non-significant association between anxiety and FEV1(%). Fifteen studies found a significant negative association between FEV1(%) and depression. Especially the studies with larger study population sizes showed significant results. The pooled analysis supported this, as the depression studies showed a significant association between depression and FEV1(%), while the anxiety studies showed part non-significant, part significant associations between anxiety and FEV1(%).

Conclusion: This systematic review did not support an association between anxiety and impairment of pulmonary function as only 3/15 studies showed significant negative associations, and some studies showed positive associations. This review indicated an association between depression and impairment pulmonary function in patients with COPD, as most studies with a larger study population size showed a significant negative association. Sytematic review registration. PROSPERO 2024 CRD42024506065 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024506065.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信