埃塞俄比亚东北部公共卫生设施药品采购做法的透明度和腐败风险:一项多设施研究。

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2024.2432446
Ewunetie Mekashaw Bayked, Mahlet Maru Menelik, Husien Nurahmed Toleha, Birhanu Demeke Workneh, Teklehaimanot Fentie Wendie, Mesfin Haile Kahissay
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚东北部公共卫生设施药品采购做法的透明度和腐败风险:一项多设施研究。","authors":"Ewunetie Mekashaw Bayked, Mahlet Maru Menelik, Husien Nurahmed Toleha, Birhanu Demeke Workneh, Teklehaimanot Fentie Wendie, Mesfin Haile Kahissay","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2432446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fraud in pharmaceutical tenders is a severe form of corruption that poses a significant threat to public health, patients, and the community. Due to the substantial financial volume in the pharmaceutical sector, vulnerable points in decision-making for market entry and purchase are at risk. As a result, the objective of this study was to measure the level of transparency and risk of corruption in pharmaceuticals' procurement practices in South Wollo, North-East Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>From October 1 to December 15, 2023, a multi-facility, cross-sectional study was conducted. The participants were pharmaceutical procurement committee (PPC) members. The World Health Organization's (WHO's) standardised interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect the data. The collected data was entered, cleaned, processed, and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27. Both descriptive and inferential statistics (univariate and linear regression analyses) were computed. The relationship between the independent (health facility level) and dependent (level of transparency) variables was determined using beta with a <i>p</i>-value of less than 0.05 and a 95% CI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred eighty-seven respondents, from 47 health centres (low, medium, and high volume) and 14 hospitals (primary, secondary, and tertiary), participated. The aggregate result showed that pharmaceutical procurement practice was very vulnerable to corruption, with a transparency level of only 33.0% (3.3 out of 10). The univariate analysis demonstrated a significant disparity in the mean transparency scores between health centres and hospitals. The linear regression also showed that for every one standard deviation increase in the facility level, there was an associated 0.39 increase in the transparency level of pharmaceutical procurement (β = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.02-0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pharmaceutical procurement practice at the health facilities was generally found to be very vulnerable to corruption, which slightly increased with a decrease in facility levels and vice versa.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"17 1","pages":"2432446"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transparency and corruption risk in pharmaceutical procurement practices at public health facilities in Northeast Ethiopia: a multi-facility study.\",\"authors\":\"Ewunetie Mekashaw Bayked, Mahlet Maru Menelik, Husien Nurahmed Toleha, Birhanu Demeke Workneh, Teklehaimanot Fentie Wendie, Mesfin Haile Kahissay\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20523211.2024.2432446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fraud in pharmaceutical tenders is a severe form of corruption that poses a significant threat to public health, patients, and the community. Due to the substantial financial volume in the pharmaceutical sector, vulnerable points in decision-making for market entry and purchase are at risk. As a result, the objective of this study was to measure the level of transparency and risk of corruption in pharmaceuticals' procurement practices in South Wollo, North-East Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>From October 1 to December 15, 2023, a multi-facility, cross-sectional study was conducted. The participants were pharmaceutical procurement committee (PPC) members. The World Health Organization's (WHO's) standardised interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect the data. The collected data was entered, cleaned, processed, and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27. Both descriptive and inferential statistics (univariate and linear regression analyses) were computed. The relationship between the independent (health facility level) and dependent (level of transparency) variables was determined using beta with a <i>p</i>-value of less than 0.05 and a 95% CI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred eighty-seven respondents, from 47 health centres (low, medium, and high volume) and 14 hospitals (primary, secondary, and tertiary), participated. The aggregate result showed that pharmaceutical procurement practice was very vulnerable to corruption, with a transparency level of only 33.0% (3.3 out of 10). The univariate analysis demonstrated a significant disparity in the mean transparency scores between health centres and hospitals. The linear regression also showed that for every one standard deviation increase in the facility level, there was an associated 0.39 increase in the transparency level of pharmaceutical procurement (β = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.02-0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pharmaceutical procurement practice at the health facilities was generally found to be very vulnerable to corruption, which slightly increased with a decrease in facility levels and vice versa.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"2432446\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616756/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2432446\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2432446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:药品招标中的欺诈是一种严重的腐败形式,对公共卫生、患者和社区构成重大威胁。由于制药行业庞大的财务体量,市场进入和采购决策的薄弱环节面临风险。因此,本研究的目的是衡量埃塞俄比亚东北部南沃罗地区药品采购实践的透明度水平和腐败风险。方法:从2023年10月1日至12月15日,进行了一项多设施的横断面研究。与会者为药品采购委员会(PPC)成员。使用世界卫生组织(WHO)的标准化访谈问卷来收集数据。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)第27版对收集的数据进行输入、清理、处理和分析。计算描述性统计和推断性统计(单变量和线性回归分析)。独立变量(卫生设施水平)和依赖变量(透明度水平)之间的关系使用β来确定,p值小于0.05,CI为95%。结果:来自47个保健中心(低、中、高容量)和14家医院(一级、二级和三级)的187名受访者参与了调查。总体结果显示,药品采购实践非常容易受到腐败的影响,透明度水平仅为33.0%(3.3 / 10)。单变量分析表明,保健中心和医院之间的平均透明度得分存在显著差异。线性回归还显示,设施水平每增加1个标准差,药品采购透明度水平相应增加0.39 (β = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.02 ~ 0.04)。结论:人们普遍认为,卫生设施的药品采购做法极易出现腐败现象,随着设施级别的降低,腐败现象略有增加,反之亦然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transparency and corruption risk in pharmaceutical procurement practices at public health facilities in Northeast Ethiopia: a multi-facility study.

Background: Fraud in pharmaceutical tenders is a severe form of corruption that poses a significant threat to public health, patients, and the community. Due to the substantial financial volume in the pharmaceutical sector, vulnerable points in decision-making for market entry and purchase are at risk. As a result, the objective of this study was to measure the level of transparency and risk of corruption in pharmaceuticals' procurement practices in South Wollo, North-East Ethiopia.

Methodology: From October 1 to December 15, 2023, a multi-facility, cross-sectional study was conducted. The participants were pharmaceutical procurement committee (PPC) members. The World Health Organization's (WHO's) standardised interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect the data. The collected data was entered, cleaned, processed, and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27. Both descriptive and inferential statistics (univariate and linear regression analyses) were computed. The relationship between the independent (health facility level) and dependent (level of transparency) variables was determined using beta with a p-value of less than 0.05 and a 95% CI.

Results: One hundred eighty-seven respondents, from 47 health centres (low, medium, and high volume) and 14 hospitals (primary, secondary, and tertiary), participated. The aggregate result showed that pharmaceutical procurement practice was very vulnerable to corruption, with a transparency level of only 33.0% (3.3 out of 10). The univariate analysis demonstrated a significant disparity in the mean transparency scores between health centres and hospitals. The linear regression also showed that for every one standard deviation increase in the facility level, there was an associated 0.39 increase in the transparency level of pharmaceutical procurement (β = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.02-0.04).

Conclusion: The pharmaceutical procurement practice at the health facilities was generally found to be very vulnerable to corruption, which slightly increased with a decrease in facility levels and vice versa.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信