管理准入协议战略对国家预算的影响与高成本药物相匹配,以最大限度地节省药物成本:一项研究方案。

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2024.2428395
Piyapat Owat, Chaoncin Sooksriwong, Hataiwan Ratanabunjerdkul, Tuangrat Phodha
{"title":"管理准入协议战略对国家预算的影响与高成本药物相匹配,以最大限度地节省药物成本:一项研究方案。","authors":"Piyapat Owat, Chaoncin Sooksriwong, Hataiwan Ratanabunjerdkul, Tuangrat Phodha","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2428395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug expenditure is an important part of health expenditure. Managed Entry Agreement (MEA) is a common strategy implemented in many countries, such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European countries to control drug expenditures, especially for new and high-cost drugs. This study aims to explore the appropriate MEA technique for reaching the lowest cost of drug procurement under specified uncertainty of the high-cost drug.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cost of drug procurement varied by the MEA techniques will be investigated in the quantitative analysis based on MEA taxonomies and uncertainty in terms of price, use, and effectiveness. Then, the content analysis will be employed to the qualitative analytical part to summarise the matching of appropriate MEA technique with the characteristics of high-cost drug to lower the cost of drug procurement and increase access to high-cost drugs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The rationales for each MEA technique selection are similar across their objectives. MEA can help reduce drug expenditures. Therefore, the budget in health care system could be sustainable and the patient access to high-cost drug could be increased. However, it might not be suitable for some circumstances and should not be implemented to determine drug price or used as regular reimbursement.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"17 1","pages":"2428395"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616773/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The national budget impact of managed entry agreement strategies match with high-cost drugs to maximise drug cost saving: a study protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Piyapat Owat, Chaoncin Sooksriwong, Hataiwan Ratanabunjerdkul, Tuangrat Phodha\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20523211.2024.2428395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug expenditure is an important part of health expenditure. Managed Entry Agreement (MEA) is a common strategy implemented in many countries, such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European countries to control drug expenditures, especially for new and high-cost drugs. This study aims to explore the appropriate MEA technique for reaching the lowest cost of drug procurement under specified uncertainty of the high-cost drug.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cost of drug procurement varied by the MEA techniques will be investigated in the quantitative analysis based on MEA taxonomies and uncertainty in terms of price, use, and effectiveness. Then, the content analysis will be employed to the qualitative analytical part to summarise the matching of appropriate MEA technique with the characteristics of high-cost drug to lower the cost of drug procurement and increase access to high-cost drugs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The rationales for each MEA technique selection are similar across their objectives. MEA can help reduce drug expenditures. Therefore, the budget in health care system could be sustainable and the patient access to high-cost drug could be increased. However, it might not be suitable for some circumstances and should not be implemented to determine drug price or used as regular reimbursement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"2428395\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616773/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2428395\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2428395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:药品支出是卫生支出的重要组成部分。管理准入协议(MEA)是许多国家(如美国、英国和欧洲国家)实施的一项共同战略,用于控制药品支出,特别是新药和高成本药物。本研究旨在探讨在高成本药品规定不确定度的情况下,合适的MEA技术以达到最低的药品采购成本。方法:基于MEA分类和价格、使用和有效性方面的不确定性,对不同MEA技术的药品采购成本进行定量分析。然后,将内容分析运用到定性分析部分,总结合适的MEA技术与高成本药品特点的匹配,以降低药品采购成本,增加高成本药品的可及性。讨论:每个MEA技术选择的基本原理在它们的目标上是相似的。多边环境协定有助于减少药品支出。因此,卫生保健系统的预算是可持续的,可以增加患者获得高成本药物的机会。但是,在某些情况下可能不合适,不应该用于确定药品价格或作为定期报销。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The national budget impact of managed entry agreement strategies match with high-cost drugs to maximise drug cost saving: a study protocol.

Background: Drug expenditure is an important part of health expenditure. Managed Entry Agreement (MEA) is a common strategy implemented in many countries, such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European countries to control drug expenditures, especially for new and high-cost drugs. This study aims to explore the appropriate MEA technique for reaching the lowest cost of drug procurement under specified uncertainty of the high-cost drug.

Methods: The cost of drug procurement varied by the MEA techniques will be investigated in the quantitative analysis based on MEA taxonomies and uncertainty in terms of price, use, and effectiveness. Then, the content analysis will be employed to the qualitative analytical part to summarise the matching of appropriate MEA technique with the characteristics of high-cost drug to lower the cost of drug procurement and increase access to high-cost drugs.

Discussion: The rationales for each MEA technique selection are similar across their objectives. MEA can help reduce drug expenditures. Therefore, the budget in health care system could be sustainable and the patient access to high-cost drug could be increased. However, it might not be suitable for some circumstances and should not be implemented to determine drug price or used as regular reimbursement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信