使用免疫检查点抑制剂治疗不同类型癌症患者的真实生存结果

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Carsten Nieder, Siv Gyda Aanes, Luka Stanisavljevic, Bård Mannsåker, Ellinor Christin Haukland
{"title":"使用免疫检查点抑制剂治疗不同类型癌症患者的真实生存结果","authors":"Carsten Nieder, Siv Gyda Aanes, Luka Stanisavljevic, Bård Mannsåker, Ellinor Christin Haukland","doi":"10.1159/000542958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now standard of care in systemic treatment for many types of metastatic cancer, often together with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Monitoring of treatment efficacy against clinical trial benchmarks in real-world populations and subgroups such as elderly patients is necessary. Based on the results of a previous study, we evaluated age-related survival differences in a larger cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of 272 patients managed in a rural real-world setting, after exclusion of those who had received neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or maintenance ICI treatment. We defined four different survival categories: death within 3 months of the first ICI dose, 3-6 months survival, 6-12 months survival, and >12 months survival. All surviving patients were followed for >12 months. Actuarial overall survival was assessed too. Age was stratified in 10-year increments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and malignant melanoma represented the most common tumor types. Median age was 70 years. Median actuarial overall survival was 13.6 months (5-year estimate 16%). The best survival was recorded in patients 61-70 years of age. The highest rate of early death within 3 months (29%) was seen in those aged >80 years. Long-term survival was not observed in this age group, in contrast to all others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Satisfactory survival was observed in this elderly patient cohort, but survival varied with tumor type and performance status. Age was not a major determinant of survival. However, the oldest patients were at higher risk of short survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Survival Outcomes in Patients with Different Types of Cancer Managed with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.\",\"authors\":\"Carsten Nieder, Siv Gyda Aanes, Luka Stanisavljevic, Bård Mannsåker, Ellinor Christin Haukland\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000542958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now standard of care in systemic treatment for many types of metastatic cancer, often together with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Monitoring of treatment efficacy against clinical trial benchmarks in real-world populations and subgroups such as elderly patients is necessary. Based on the results of a previous study, we evaluated age-related survival differences in a larger cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of 272 patients managed in a rural real-world setting, after exclusion of those who had received neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or maintenance ICI treatment. We defined four different survival categories: death within 3 months of the first ICI dose, 3-6 months survival, 6-12 months survival, and >12 months survival. All surviving patients were followed for >12 months. Actuarial overall survival was assessed too. Age was stratified in 10-year increments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and malignant melanoma represented the most common tumor types. Median age was 70 years. Median actuarial overall survival was 13.6 months (5-year estimate 16%). The best survival was recorded in patients 61-70 years of age. The highest rate of early death within 3 months (29%) was seen in those aged >80 years. Long-term survival was not observed in this age group, in contrast to all others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Satisfactory survival was observed in this elderly patient cohort, but survival varied with tumor type and performance status. Age was not a major determinant of survival. However, the oldest patients were at higher risk of short survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542958\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542958","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)现在是许多类型转移性癌症全身治疗的标准护理,通常与细胞毒性化疗一起。有必要根据临床试验基准对现实世界人群和亚组(如老年患者)的治疗效果进行监测。基于先前的研究结果,我们在一个更大的队列中评估了与年龄相关的生存差异。方法:回顾性分析在农村现实环境中管理的272例患者,排除那些接受新辅助、辅助或维持ICI治疗的患者。我们定义了四种不同的生存类别:首次注射ICI后3个月内死亡、3-6个月生存、6-12个月生存和10 -12个月生存。所有存活患者随访10 ~ 12个月。精算总生存率也进行了评估。年龄以10年为单位分层。结果:非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)和恶性黑色素瘤是最常见的肿瘤类型。中位年龄为70岁。精算总生存中位数为13.6个月(5年估计为16%)。61 ~ 70岁的患者生存率最高。3个月内早期死亡率最高(29%)见于年龄在80 ~ 80岁之间的人群。与其他所有年龄组相比,该年龄组未观察到长期生存。结论:该老年患者的生存率较好,但生存率随肿瘤类型和运动状态的不同而不同。年龄不是生存的主要决定因素。然而,年龄最大的患者短期生存的风险更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-World Survival Outcomes in Patients with Different Types of Cancer Managed with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now standard of care in systemic treatment for many types of metastatic cancer, often together with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Monitoring of treatment efficacy against clinical trial benchmarks in real-world populations and subgroups such as elderly patients is necessary. Based on the results of a previous study, we evaluated age-related survival differences in a larger cohort.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of 272 patients managed in a rural real-world setting, after exclusion of those who had received neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or maintenance ICI treatment. We defined four different survival categories: death within 3 months of the first ICI dose, 3-6 months survival, 6-12 months survival, and >12 months survival. All surviving patients were followed for >12 months. Actuarial overall survival was assessed too. Age was stratified in 10-year increments.

Results: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and malignant melanoma represented the most common tumor types. Median age was 70 years. Median actuarial overall survival was 13.6 months (5-year estimate 16%). The best survival was recorded in patients 61-70 years of age. The highest rate of early death within 3 months (29%) was seen in those aged >80 years. Long-term survival was not observed in this age group, in contrast to all others.

Conclusion: Satisfactory survival was observed in this elderly patient cohort, but survival varied with tumor type and performance status. Age was not a major determinant of survival. However, the oldest patients were at higher risk of short survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: With the first issue in 2014, the journal ''Onkologie'' has changed its title to ''Oncology Research and Treatment''. By this change, publisher and editor set the scene for the further development of this interdisciplinary journal. The English title makes it clear that the articles are published in English – a logical step for the journal, which is listed in all relevant international databases. For excellent manuscripts, a ''Fast Track'' was introduced: The review is carried out within 2 weeks; after acceptance the papers are published online within 14 days and immediately released as ''Editor’s Choice'' to provide the authors with maximum visibility of their results. Interesting case reports are published in the section ''Novel Insights from Clinical Practice'' which clearly highlights the scientific advances which the report presents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信