两种材料的深缘提升技术对e.max内冠修复体应力分布影响的有限元分析

IF 1.9 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
International Journal of Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ijod/6753069
Fariba MahmoudiYamchi, Mahdi Abbasi, Faezeh Atri, Elham Ahmadi
{"title":"两种材料的深缘提升技术对e.max内冠修复体应力分布影响的有限元分析","authors":"Fariba MahmoudiYamchi, Mahdi Abbasi, Faezeh Atri, Elham Ahmadi","doi":"10.1155/ijod/6753069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The impact of the deep margin elevation (DME) technique and its associated materials on the stress distribution in ceramic endocrowns remains to be fully understood. This finite element analysis (FEA) aimed to assess the effects of flowable composite and resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) as DME materials on the maximum Von Mises stress (VMS) values and overall stress distribution within ceramic endocrowns and the surrounding tooth structure. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A mandibular molar featuring a class II mesio occlusal (MO) cavity with the gingival margin of the mesial cavity positioned 2 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) was prepared and scanned using a Medit i500 scanner. The digital file was then transferred to computer-aided design (CAD) software to create the models. The study generated four scenarios: an intact tooth model (model of intact tooth (MIT)), a prepared tooth model without a DME layer (model without DME (MWD)), a model with a 2 mm DME layer using composite material (model with DME of composite (MDC)), and a model employing RMGI (model with DME of RMGI (MDR)). Stress distribution under axial loads was evaluated based on the Von Mises criterion. <b>Results:</b> The MIT model demonstrated the highest stress concentration at the CEJ region yet exhibited lower stress levels than others. The MWD model showed the highest stress levels. No significant differences in stress distribution patterns were observed between the MDR and MDC models. All models displayed similar stress distributions in the bone. <b>Conclusion:</b> Regardless of the material used, incorporating a DME layer in cavities extending below the CEJ is advisable to achieve uniform stress distribution. Minimizing tooth preparation and preserving tooth structure are recommended. <b>Clinical Significance:</b> Employing a DME layer in cavities with margins below the CEJ is beneficial for reducing stress, irrespective of the material choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":"2024 ","pages":"6753069"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617049/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Deep Margin Elevation Technique With Two Restorative Materials on Stress Distribution of e.max Endocrown Restorations: A Finite Element Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Fariba MahmoudiYamchi, Mahdi Abbasi, Faezeh Atri, Elham Ahmadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ijod/6753069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The impact of the deep margin elevation (DME) technique and its associated materials on the stress distribution in ceramic endocrowns remains to be fully understood. This finite element analysis (FEA) aimed to assess the effects of flowable composite and resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) as DME materials on the maximum Von Mises stress (VMS) values and overall stress distribution within ceramic endocrowns and the surrounding tooth structure. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A mandibular molar featuring a class II mesio occlusal (MO) cavity with the gingival margin of the mesial cavity positioned 2 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) was prepared and scanned using a Medit i500 scanner. The digital file was then transferred to computer-aided design (CAD) software to create the models. The study generated four scenarios: an intact tooth model (model of intact tooth (MIT)), a prepared tooth model without a DME layer (model without DME (MWD)), a model with a 2 mm DME layer using composite material (model with DME of composite (MDC)), and a model employing RMGI (model with DME of RMGI (MDR)). Stress distribution under axial loads was evaluated based on the Von Mises criterion. <b>Results:</b> The MIT model demonstrated the highest stress concentration at the CEJ region yet exhibited lower stress levels than others. The MWD model showed the highest stress levels. No significant differences in stress distribution patterns were observed between the MDR and MDC models. All models displayed similar stress distributions in the bone. <b>Conclusion:</b> Regardless of the material used, incorporating a DME layer in cavities extending below the CEJ is advisable to achieve uniform stress distribution. Minimizing tooth preparation and preserving tooth structure are recommended. <b>Clinical Significance:</b> Employing a DME layer in cavities with margins below the CEJ is beneficial for reducing stress, irrespective of the material choice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"6753069\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617049/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/6753069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/6753069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:深缘提升技术(deep margin elevation, DME)及其相关材料对陶瓷内冠应力分布的影响尚不清楚。本文通过有限元分析(FEA)研究了可流动复合材料和树脂改性玻璃离聚体(RMGI)作为DME材料对陶瓷内冠和周围牙齿结构内最大Von Mises应力(VMS)值和总应力分布的影响。材料和方法:制备一颗具有II类近中牙合(MO)腔的下颌磨牙,近中牙合腔的龈缘位于牙骨质-牙釉质交界处(CEJ)下方2mm处,并使用Medit i500扫描仪进行扫描。然后将数字文件传输到计算机辅助设计(CAD)软件中以创建模型。本研究生成了四种场景:完整牙齿模型(完整牙齿模型(MIT))、没有DME层的制备牙齿模型(没有DME层的模型(MWD))、使用复合材料的2 mm DME层模型(复合材料的DME模型(MDC))和使用RMGI的模型(RMGI的DME模型(MDR))。基于Von Mises准则对轴向载荷作用下的应力分布进行了评价。结果:MIT模型在CEJ区域表现出最高的应力集中,但其应力水平低于其他模型。MWD模型显示出最高的应力水平。应力分布模式在MDR和MDC模型之间没有显著差异。所有模型在骨骼中显示出相似的应力分布。结论:无论使用何种材料,在延伸到CEJ以下的空腔中加入二甲醚层是可取的,可以实现均匀的应力分布。建议尽量减少牙齿的准备工作,保持牙齿的结构。临床意义:无论选择何种材料,在边缘低于CEJ的空腔中使用二甲醚层都有利于减轻应力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of Deep Margin Elevation Technique With Two Restorative Materials on Stress Distribution of e.max Endocrown Restorations: A Finite Element Analysis.

Objective: The impact of the deep margin elevation (DME) technique and its associated materials on the stress distribution in ceramic endocrowns remains to be fully understood. This finite element analysis (FEA) aimed to assess the effects of flowable composite and resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) as DME materials on the maximum Von Mises stress (VMS) values and overall stress distribution within ceramic endocrowns and the surrounding tooth structure. Materials and Methods: A mandibular molar featuring a class II mesio occlusal (MO) cavity with the gingival margin of the mesial cavity positioned 2 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) was prepared and scanned using a Medit i500 scanner. The digital file was then transferred to computer-aided design (CAD) software to create the models. The study generated four scenarios: an intact tooth model (model of intact tooth (MIT)), a prepared tooth model without a DME layer (model without DME (MWD)), a model with a 2 mm DME layer using composite material (model with DME of composite (MDC)), and a model employing RMGI (model with DME of RMGI (MDR)). Stress distribution under axial loads was evaluated based on the Von Mises criterion. Results: The MIT model demonstrated the highest stress concentration at the CEJ region yet exhibited lower stress levels than others. The MWD model showed the highest stress levels. No significant differences in stress distribution patterns were observed between the MDR and MDC models. All models displayed similar stress distributions in the bone. Conclusion: Regardless of the material used, incorporating a DME layer in cavities extending below the CEJ is advisable to achieve uniform stress distribution. Minimizing tooth preparation and preserving tooth structure are recommended. Clinical Significance: Employing a DME layer in cavities with margins below the CEJ is beneficial for reducing stress, irrespective of the material choice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Dentistry
International Journal of Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
219
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信