在儿科患者中使用筛查工具确定的潜在不适当处方的患病率:一项系统评价。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Shamala Balan, Norkasihan Ibrahim
{"title":"在儿科患者中使用筛查工具确定的潜在不适当处方的患病率:一项系统评价。","authors":"Shamala Balan, Norkasihan Ibrahim","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Inappropriate prescriptions are known to cause medication-related problems, but little is known about the prevalence of this issue in paediatric patients. This systematic review provides an overview of the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescriptions identified through tools developed for the paediatric population and delineates the strengths and limitations of the identification tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature from PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane database and Google Scholar was searched with a combination of medical subject headings (MeSH) and free-text terms related to inappropriate prescriptions, paediatrics and potentially inappropriate prescription tools. Studies reported in English and published from inception of the databases until May 2023 were selected based on fulfilment of eligibility criteria. All eligible articles were assessed for methodological quality and examined using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority of the studies were of high quality. Four themes emerged-namely, evaluation tools and calculation methods of inappropriate prescriptions, prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs), and predictors of PIM and PPO in children. Among the nine tools identified, the original and modified version of the POPI tool was most commonly used. The prevalence of PIM and PPO ranged from 0.04% to 69% and from 1.5% to 55.9%, respectively. Age was the most common predictor reported, whereby PIMs and PPOs were more likely in children aged 2-6 and 6-12 years, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Potentially inappropriate prescriptions in paediatric patients is highly prevalent, despite the wide variation in the reported prevalence range and limited implementation of the available tools in practice. Future efforts need to be focused on the development and implementation of age-, disease- or country-specific tools to effectively evaluate and further determine the economic impact of PIMs in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescriptions identified using screening tools in paediatric patients: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Shamala Balan, Norkasihan Ibrahim\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Inappropriate prescriptions are known to cause medication-related problems, but little is known about the prevalence of this issue in paediatric patients. This systematic review provides an overview of the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescriptions identified through tools developed for the paediatric population and delineates the strengths and limitations of the identification tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature from PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane database and Google Scholar was searched with a combination of medical subject headings (MeSH) and free-text terms related to inappropriate prescriptions, paediatrics and potentially inappropriate prescription tools. Studies reported in English and published from inception of the databases until May 2023 were selected based on fulfilment of eligibility criteria. All eligible articles were assessed for methodological quality and examined using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority of the studies were of high quality. Four themes emerged-namely, evaluation tools and calculation methods of inappropriate prescriptions, prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs), and predictors of PIM and PPO in children. Among the nine tools identified, the original and modified version of the POPI tool was most commonly used. The prevalence of PIM and PPO ranged from 0.04% to 69% and from 1.5% to 55.9%, respectively. Age was the most common predictor reported, whereby PIMs and PPOs were more likely in children aged 2-6 and 6-12 years, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Potentially inappropriate prescriptions in paediatric patients is highly prevalent, despite the wide variation in the reported prevalence range and limited implementation of the available tools in practice. Future efforts need to be focused on the development and implementation of age-, disease- or country-specific tools to effectively evaluate and further determine the economic impact of PIMs in children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004169\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004169","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:不适当的处方已知会导致药物相关问题,但对儿科患者中这一问题的患病率知之甚少。本系统综述概述了通过为儿科人群开发的工具识别出的潜在不适当处方的流行情况,并描述了识别工具的优势和局限性。方法:从PubMed、CINAHL、Cochrane数据库和谷歌Scholar检索医学主题词(MeSH)和与不适当处方、儿科和潜在不适当处方工具相关的自由文本术语。从数据库建立到2023年5月,以英文报告和发表的研究是根据符合资格标准进行选择的。对所有符合条件的文章进行方法学质量评估,并使用专题分析进行检查。结果:12项研究符合纳入标准。大多数研究都是高质量的。出现了四个主题,即不适当处方的评估工具和计算方法,潜在不适当药物(PIMs)和潜在处方遗漏(PPOs)的患病率,以及儿童PIM和PPO的预测因素。在确定的九个工具中,原始和修改版本的POPI工具是最常用的。PIM和PPO的患病率分别为0.04% ~ 69%和1.5% ~ 55.9%。年龄是最常见的预测因素,因此pim和PPOs更可能分别发生在2-6岁和6-12岁的儿童中。结论:尽管报告的患病率范围差异很大,并且在实践中可用工具的实施有限,但儿科患者中潜在的不适当处方非常普遍。今后的努力需要集中于制定和实施针对年龄、疾病或国家的工具,以有效评价和进一步确定预防犯罪管理方案对儿童的经济影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescriptions identified using screening tools in paediatric patients: a systematic review.

Objectives: Inappropriate prescriptions are known to cause medication-related problems, but little is known about the prevalence of this issue in paediatric patients. This systematic review provides an overview of the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescriptions identified through tools developed for the paediatric population and delineates the strengths and limitations of the identification tools.

Methods: Literature from PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane database and Google Scholar was searched with a combination of medical subject headings (MeSH) and free-text terms related to inappropriate prescriptions, paediatrics and potentially inappropriate prescription tools. Studies reported in English and published from inception of the databases until May 2023 were selected based on fulfilment of eligibility criteria. All eligible articles were assessed for methodological quality and examined using thematic analysis.

Results: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority of the studies were of high quality. Four themes emerged-namely, evaluation tools and calculation methods of inappropriate prescriptions, prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs), and predictors of PIM and PPO in children. Among the nine tools identified, the original and modified version of the POPI tool was most commonly used. The prevalence of PIM and PPO ranged from 0.04% to 69% and from 1.5% to 55.9%, respectively. Age was the most common predictor reported, whereby PIMs and PPOs were more likely in children aged 2-6 and 6-12 years, respectively.

Conclusions: Potentially inappropriate prescriptions in paediatric patients is highly prevalent, despite the wide variation in the reported prevalence range and limited implementation of the available tools in practice. Future efforts need to be focused on the development and implementation of age-, disease- or country-specific tools to effectively evaluate and further determine the economic impact of PIMs in children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) offers a high quality, peer-reviewed platform for the publication of practical and innovative research which aims to strengthen the profile and professional status of hospital pharmacists. EJHP is committed to being the leading journal on all aspects of hospital pharmacy, thereby advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. The journal aims to become a major source for education and inspiration to improve practice and the standard of patient care in hospitals and related institutions worldwide. EJHP is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信