具有个体风险感知场生成的博弈论驾驶员转向模型。

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Accident; analysis and prevention Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2024.107869
Wenfeng Guo, Jun Li, Xiaolin Song, Weiwei Zhang
{"title":"具有个体风险感知场生成的博弈论驾驶员转向模型。","authors":"Wenfeng Guo, Jun Li, Xiaolin Song, Weiwei Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2024.107869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Driver-automation shared steering control (SSC) has emerged as a promising technology for enhancing vehicle safety, but desire to achieve seamless collaboration between the driver and automation requires an in-depth understanding of driver steering behavior in interaction with automation. In this paper, we introduce a game-theoretic driver steering model with individual risk perception field generation. Firstly, a driver risk perception field is developed based on a novel concept of potential injury risk (PIR) to provide a quantitative estimation of the driver's perceived driving risk. This approach offers an explicit and physically meaningful structure for simulating the driver's risk perception process and elucidating the reasons for discrepancies in risk perception. Then, this driver risk perception field is integrated into the framework of non-cooperative Nash game to model the steering interaction between the driver and automation, and the analytical expression of Nash equilibrium is derived in detail. The resulting combined driver model effectively captures the driver adaptation at both the control and planning levels. Next, the key parameters of the combined driver model and its comparators are identified using measured driver steering behavior data from thirty subjects in a series of driving simulator experiments. Finally, the effectiveness and superiority of the combined driver model is validated through a comprehensive comparative analysis. The results demonstrate that the combined driver model achieves the lowest prediction errors compared to its comparators and effectively captures the individual differences in risk perception and steering behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"211 ","pages":"107869"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A game-theoretic driver steering model with individual risk perception field generation.\",\"authors\":\"Wenfeng Guo, Jun Li, Xiaolin Song, Weiwei Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aap.2024.107869\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Driver-automation shared steering control (SSC) has emerged as a promising technology for enhancing vehicle safety, but desire to achieve seamless collaboration between the driver and automation requires an in-depth understanding of driver steering behavior in interaction with automation. In this paper, we introduce a game-theoretic driver steering model with individual risk perception field generation. Firstly, a driver risk perception field is developed based on a novel concept of potential injury risk (PIR) to provide a quantitative estimation of the driver's perceived driving risk. This approach offers an explicit and physically meaningful structure for simulating the driver's risk perception process and elucidating the reasons for discrepancies in risk perception. Then, this driver risk perception field is integrated into the framework of non-cooperative Nash game to model the steering interaction between the driver and automation, and the analytical expression of Nash equilibrium is derived in detail. The resulting combined driver model effectively captures the driver adaptation at both the control and planning levels. Next, the key parameters of the combined driver model and its comparators are identified using measured driver steering behavior data from thirty subjects in a series of driving simulator experiments. Finally, the effectiveness and superiority of the combined driver model is validated through a comprehensive comparative analysis. The results demonstrate that the combined driver model achieves the lowest prediction errors compared to its comparators and effectively captures the individual differences in risk perception and steering behavior.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accident; analysis and prevention\",\"volume\":\"211 \",\"pages\":\"107869\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accident; analysis and prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2024.107869\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2024.107869","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

驾驶自动化共享转向控制(SSC)已成为提高车辆安全性的一项有前途的技术,但要实现驾驶员和自动化之间的无缝协作,需要深入了解驾驶员在与自动化交互时的转向行为。本文提出了一种具有个体风险感知场生成的博弈论驾驶员转向模型。首先,基于潜在伤害风险(PIR)的概念,建立驾驶员风险感知场,对驾驶员感知驾驶风险进行定量估计;该方法为模拟驾驶员的风险感知过程和阐明风险感知差异的原因提供了一个明确的、有物理意义的结构。然后,将驾驶员风险感知领域整合到非合作纳什博弈框架中,对驾驶员与自动驾驶之间的转向交互进行建模,并详细推导了纳什均衡的解析表达式。所得到的组合驱动模型在控制和计划两个层次上都有效地捕获了驱动的适应性。接下来,利用30名受试者在一系列驾驶模拟器实验中测量到的驾驶员转向行为数据,确定组合驾驶员模型及其比较模型的关键参数。最后,通过综合对比分析,验证了组合驱动模型的有效性和优越性。结果表明,与其他比较模型相比,组合驾驶员模型的预测误差最小,并能有效地捕捉风险感知和驾驶行为的个体差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A game-theoretic driver steering model with individual risk perception field generation.

Driver-automation shared steering control (SSC) has emerged as a promising technology for enhancing vehicle safety, but desire to achieve seamless collaboration between the driver and automation requires an in-depth understanding of driver steering behavior in interaction with automation. In this paper, we introduce a game-theoretic driver steering model with individual risk perception field generation. Firstly, a driver risk perception field is developed based on a novel concept of potential injury risk (PIR) to provide a quantitative estimation of the driver's perceived driving risk. This approach offers an explicit and physically meaningful structure for simulating the driver's risk perception process and elucidating the reasons for discrepancies in risk perception. Then, this driver risk perception field is integrated into the framework of non-cooperative Nash game to model the steering interaction between the driver and automation, and the analytical expression of Nash equilibrium is derived in detail. The resulting combined driver model effectively captures the driver adaptation at both the control and planning levels. Next, the key parameters of the combined driver model and its comparators are identified using measured driver steering behavior data from thirty subjects in a series of driving simulator experiments. Finally, the effectiveness and superiority of the combined driver model is validated through a comprehensive comparative analysis. The results demonstrate that the combined driver model achieves the lowest prediction errors compared to its comparators and effectively captures the individual differences in risk perception and steering behavior.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信