傅里叶变换红外光谱技术在有限混合模型中量化煤矿和金属非金属矿山可吸入粉尘量的应用。

IF 2.2 3区 化学 Q2 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
Andrew T Weakley, David A Parks, Arthur L Miller
{"title":"傅里叶变换红外光谱技术在有限混合模型中量化煤矿和金属非金属矿山可吸入粉尘量的应用。","authors":"Andrew T Weakley, David A Parks, Arthur L Miller","doi":"10.1177/00037028241296158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Respirable dust mass is a prevalent occupational health hazard to the mining workforce. Mineral matrices observed in the mine environment are complex, time varying, and heterogeneous. This poses a challenge to assessing dust exposure using Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometry as calibrations for constituent dust species (e.g., crystalline silica) have historically been trained using homogeneous standards or simple mixtures therein. Investigations have considered direct-on-filter analysis, which collects FT-IR spectra directly from sampling filters for calibration, as an alternative. Direct-on-filter analysis using a partial least squares (PLS) method has gained particular interest recently due to the potential to rapidly quantify multiple species from a single filter at the mine site. By design, heterogeneity, and its presumed impact on method accuracy, cannot be addressed in the laboratory when using a direct-on-filter approach motivating the need for more advanced calibration approaches. When heterogeneity is present, mixture of experts (MoE) finite mixture models offer a promising and novel alternative to PLS direct-on-filter analysis as MoE incorporates cluster discovery, regression, and outlier identification into model fitting. Three MoE models of increasing complexity were tasked with determining respirable dust mass in 243 field samples from thirteen active coal, limestone, sandstone, and silver mines. All MoE models, including those using only \"expert\" spectroscopic predictors or a combination of expert and categorical \"gate\" variables (e.g., mine type), significantly outperform PLS in terms of accuracy (α = 0.05). Decomposing bias by mine type shows that accuracy generally improves across all types considered when MoE models are not overfitted. The MoE method's effectiveness was linked to its ability to endogenously classify outliers as well as possibly to the use of an additional cluster model for mass predictions. Overall, MoE methods appear as a capable and novel tool to addressing problems of heterogeneity for direct-on-filter quantitative analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8253,"journal":{"name":"Applied Spectroscopy","volume":" ","pages":"37028241296158"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying Finite Mixture Models to Quantify Respirable Dust Mass in Coal and Metal-Nonmetal Mines Using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew T Weakley, David A Parks, Arthur L Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00037028241296158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Respirable dust mass is a prevalent occupational health hazard to the mining workforce. Mineral matrices observed in the mine environment are complex, time varying, and heterogeneous. This poses a challenge to assessing dust exposure using Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometry as calibrations for constituent dust species (e.g., crystalline silica) have historically been trained using homogeneous standards or simple mixtures therein. Investigations have considered direct-on-filter analysis, which collects FT-IR spectra directly from sampling filters for calibration, as an alternative. Direct-on-filter analysis using a partial least squares (PLS) method has gained particular interest recently due to the potential to rapidly quantify multiple species from a single filter at the mine site. By design, heterogeneity, and its presumed impact on method accuracy, cannot be addressed in the laboratory when using a direct-on-filter approach motivating the need for more advanced calibration approaches. When heterogeneity is present, mixture of experts (MoE) finite mixture models offer a promising and novel alternative to PLS direct-on-filter analysis as MoE incorporates cluster discovery, regression, and outlier identification into model fitting. Three MoE models of increasing complexity were tasked with determining respirable dust mass in 243 field samples from thirteen active coal, limestone, sandstone, and silver mines. All MoE models, including those using only \\\"expert\\\" spectroscopic predictors or a combination of expert and categorical \\\"gate\\\" variables (e.g., mine type), significantly outperform PLS in terms of accuracy (α = 0.05). Decomposing bias by mine type shows that accuracy generally improves across all types considered when MoE models are not overfitted. The MoE method's effectiveness was linked to its ability to endogenously classify outliers as well as possibly to the use of an additional cluster model for mass predictions. Overall, MoE methods appear as a capable and novel tool to addressing problems of heterogeneity for direct-on-filter quantitative analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Spectroscopy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"37028241296158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Spectroscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00037028241296158\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Spectroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00037028241296158","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可呼吸粉尘团块是采矿工人普遍存在的职业健康危害。在矿山环境中观测到的矿物基质具有复杂性、时变性和非均质性。这对使用傅里叶变换红外(FT-IR)光谱法评估粉尘暴露提出了挑战,因为对成分粉尘(例如,结晶二氧化硅)的校准历来使用均质标准或其中的简单混合物进行训练。研究考虑了直接滤波分析,即直接从采样滤波器收集FT-IR光谱进行校准,作为一种替代方法。使用偏最小二乘(PLS)方法的直接过滤分析最近获得了特别的兴趣,因为有可能从矿山现场的单个过滤器快速量化多个物种。通过设计,异质性及其对方法准确性的假定影响无法在实验室中解决,当使用直接滤波方法时,需要更先进的校准方法。当异质性存在时,专家混合(MoE)有限混合模型提供了一种有前途的新颖替代PLS直接过滤分析,因为MoE将聚类发现,回归和离群值识别纳入模型拟合。三个日益复杂的MoE模型被用于确定来自13个活跃煤、石灰石、砂岩和银矿的243个现场样本的可吸入尘埃质量。所有MoE模型,包括那些只使用“专家”光谱预测因子或专家和分类“门”变量(例如,矿山类型)的组合的模型,在准确性方面显着优于PLS (α = 0.05)。按地雷类型分解偏差表明,当MoE模型没有过拟合时,所考虑的所有类型的精度通常都会提高。MoE方法的有效性与其内生分类异常值的能力以及使用额外的聚类模型进行质量预测的能力有关。总的来说,MoE方法似乎是解决直接过滤定量分析的异质性问题的一种有能力和新颖的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applying Finite Mixture Models to Quantify Respirable Dust Mass in Coal and Metal-Nonmetal Mines Using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy.

Respirable dust mass is a prevalent occupational health hazard to the mining workforce. Mineral matrices observed in the mine environment are complex, time varying, and heterogeneous. This poses a challenge to assessing dust exposure using Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometry as calibrations for constituent dust species (e.g., crystalline silica) have historically been trained using homogeneous standards or simple mixtures therein. Investigations have considered direct-on-filter analysis, which collects FT-IR spectra directly from sampling filters for calibration, as an alternative. Direct-on-filter analysis using a partial least squares (PLS) method has gained particular interest recently due to the potential to rapidly quantify multiple species from a single filter at the mine site. By design, heterogeneity, and its presumed impact on method accuracy, cannot be addressed in the laboratory when using a direct-on-filter approach motivating the need for more advanced calibration approaches. When heterogeneity is present, mixture of experts (MoE) finite mixture models offer a promising and novel alternative to PLS direct-on-filter analysis as MoE incorporates cluster discovery, regression, and outlier identification into model fitting. Three MoE models of increasing complexity were tasked with determining respirable dust mass in 243 field samples from thirteen active coal, limestone, sandstone, and silver mines. All MoE models, including those using only "expert" spectroscopic predictors or a combination of expert and categorical "gate" variables (e.g., mine type), significantly outperform PLS in terms of accuracy (α = 0.05). Decomposing bias by mine type shows that accuracy generally improves across all types considered when MoE models are not overfitted. The MoE method's effectiveness was linked to its ability to endogenously classify outliers as well as possibly to the use of an additional cluster model for mass predictions. Overall, MoE methods appear as a capable and novel tool to addressing problems of heterogeneity for direct-on-filter quantitative analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Spectroscopy
Applied Spectroscopy 工程技术-光谱学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Applied Spectroscopy is one of the world''s leading spectroscopy journals, publishing high-quality peer-reviewed articles, both fundamental and applied, covering all aspects of spectroscopy. Established in 1951, the journal is owned by the Society for Applied Spectroscopy and is published monthly. The journal is dedicated to fulfilling the mission of the Society to “…advance and disseminate knowledge and information concerning the art and science of spectroscopy and other allied sciences.”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信