作为对话的多模态论证

IF 1 2区文学 Q3 COMMUNICATION

Argumentation Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1007/s10503-024-09639-8

Jan Albert van Laar

{"title":"作为对话的多模态论证","authors":"Jan Albert van Laar","doi":"10.1007/s10503-024-09639-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>According to a dialectical approach to argumentation, a single argument can be seen as a dialogical \"Why? Because!\" sequence. Does this also apply to multimodal arguments? This paper focuses on multimodal arguments with a predominantly visual character and shows that dialogues are helpful for identifying and reconstructing arguments in multimodal communication. To include nonverbal arguments in dialectical argumentation theory, it is proposed to regard dialogue as mode-fluid. The account of multimodal argument as dialogue will be compared with Champagne and Pietarinen’s account of visual argument as movement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46219,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation","volume":"38 4","pages":"457 - 476"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10503-024-09639-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multimodal Argument as Dialogue\",\"authors\":\"Jan Albert van Laar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10503-024-09639-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>According to a dialectical approach to argumentation, a single argument can be seen as a dialogical \\\"Why? Because!\\\" sequence. Does this also apply to multimodal arguments? This paper focuses on multimodal arguments with a predominantly visual character and shows that dialogues are helpful for identifying and reconstructing arguments in multimodal communication. To include nonverbal arguments in dialectical argumentation theory, it is proposed to regard dialogue as mode-fluid. The account of multimodal argument as dialogue will be compared with Champagne and Pietarinen’s account of visual argument as movement.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Argumentation\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"457 - 476\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10503-024-09639-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Argumentation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10503-024-09639-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argumentation","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10503-024-09639-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

根据辩证的论证方法，一个单一的论证可以被看作是一个对话的“为什么？”因为!”序列。这也适用于多模态论证吗？本文主要研究以视觉特征为主的多模态论证，并指出对话有助于识别和重构多模态交际中的论证。为了将非语言论证纳入辩证论证理论，建议将对话视为模式流动。将多模态论证作为对话的叙述与香槟和皮塔里宁将视觉论证作为运动的叙述进行比较。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Multimodal Argument as Dialogue

According to a dialectical approach to argumentation, a single argument can be seen as a dialogical "Why? Because!" sequence. Does this also apply to multimodal arguments? This paper focuses on multimodal arguments with a predominantly visual character and shows that dialogues are helpful for identifying and reconstructing arguments in multimodal communication. To include nonverbal arguments in dialectical argumentation theory, it is proposed to regard dialogue as mode-fluid. The account of multimodal argument as dialogue will be compared with Champagne and Pietarinen’s account of visual argument as movement.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Argumentation Multiple-

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Argumentation is an international and interdisciplinary journal. Its aim is to gather academic contributions from a wide range of scholarly backgrounds and approaches to reasoning, natural inference and persuasion: communication, rhetoric (classical and modern), linguistics, discourse analysis, pragmatics, psychology, philosophy, logic (formal and informal), critical thinking, history and law. Its scope includes a diversity of interests, varying from philosophical, theoretical and analytical to empirical and practical topics. Argumentation publishes papers, book reviews, a yearly bibliography, and announcements of conferences and seminars.To be considered for publication in the journal, a paper must satisfy all of these criteria:1. Report research that is within the journals’ scope: concentrating on argumentation 2. Pose a clear and relevant research question 3. Make a contribution to the literature that connects with the state of the art in the field of argumentation theory 4. Be sound in methodology and analysis 5. Provide appropriate evidence and argumentation for the conclusions 6. Be presented in a clear and intelligible fashion in standard English