贮藏对猪鼻黏膜体外渗透及黏附实验的影响

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jaiza Samara Macena de Araújo, Gabriela Gama Xavier Augusto, Aylla Mesquita Pestana, Francisco Carlos Groppo, Flávia Sammartino Mariano Rodrigues, Pedro Duarte Novaes, Michelle Franz-Montan
{"title":"贮藏对猪鼻黏膜体外渗透及黏附实验的影响","authors":"Jaiza Samara Macena de Araújo,&nbsp;Gabriela Gama Xavier Augusto,&nbsp;Aylla Mesquita Pestana,&nbsp;Francisco Carlos Groppo,&nbsp;Flávia Sammartino Mariano Rodrigues,&nbsp;Pedro Duarte Novaes,&nbsp;Michelle Franz-Montan","doi":"10.1208/s12249-024-03002-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Intranasal topical administration offers a promising route for local and systemic drug delivery, with <i>in vitro</i> permeation and mucoadhesion studies often using porcine models. However, the impact of storage on mucosal integrity after the procedure remains unaddressed. This study aimed to standardize the preparation process and evaluated whether storage of porcine nasal mucosa impairs its integrity and permeability for experimental comparisons. Additionally, an optimized <i>in vitro</i> mucoadhesion experiment using texture analyzer equipment was investigated. Porcine nasal mucosa was subjected to different storage conditions (\"fresh\"; refrigerated at 4°C for 24 h and 48 h, and frozen at -20°C for two or three weeks) and assessed using optical and transmission electron microscopy. <i>In vitro</i> permeation assays were performed in a Franz-type vertical diffusion system with lidocaine hydrochloride (LDC). <i>In vitro</i> mucoadhesion assays were conducted using fresh nasal mucosa and a commercial nasal topical formulation using TA.XT. Plus texture analyzer. The variables involved (probe speed, contact time, and application force) in assessing mucoadhesive capacity (maximum mucoadhesive force F<sub>max</sub> and work of mucoadhesion W<sub>muc</sub>) were optimized using a Central Composite Design. Fresh tissues showed no alterations in histological arrangement or in the ultrastructure of adherence junctions. Stored tissues exhibited histological disorganization, reduced thickness, and loss of epithelial integrity. LDC permeability increased in storage tissues (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Contact force had a positive effect on F<sub>max</sub> and W<sub>muc</sub> (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), with a minimum required value of 0.48 N. Variations in contact time and probe speed did not affect the responses (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). In conclusion, the preparation technique was adequate to maintain mucosa integrity for permeability studies. However, storing the mucosa at 4 or -20°C overestimated LDC permeation, which could mislead critical data for formulation development. Therefore, the use of fresh mucosa is recommended to ensure more reliable results. For <i>in vitro</i> mucoadhesion assays, a minimum contact force of 0.48N is required for optimal responses.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":6925,"journal":{"name":"AAPS PharmSciTech","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Storage on In Vitro Permeation and Mucoadhesion Setup Experiments Using Swine Nasal Mucosa\",\"authors\":\"Jaiza Samara Macena de Araújo,&nbsp;Gabriela Gama Xavier Augusto,&nbsp;Aylla Mesquita Pestana,&nbsp;Francisco Carlos Groppo,&nbsp;Flávia Sammartino Mariano Rodrigues,&nbsp;Pedro Duarte Novaes,&nbsp;Michelle Franz-Montan\",\"doi\":\"10.1208/s12249-024-03002-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Intranasal topical administration offers a promising route for local and systemic drug delivery, with <i>in vitro</i> permeation and mucoadhesion studies often using porcine models. However, the impact of storage on mucosal integrity after the procedure remains unaddressed. This study aimed to standardize the preparation process and evaluated whether storage of porcine nasal mucosa impairs its integrity and permeability for experimental comparisons. Additionally, an optimized <i>in vitro</i> mucoadhesion experiment using texture analyzer equipment was investigated. Porcine nasal mucosa was subjected to different storage conditions (\\\"fresh\\\"; refrigerated at 4°C for 24 h and 48 h, and frozen at -20°C for two or three weeks) and assessed using optical and transmission electron microscopy. <i>In vitro</i> permeation assays were performed in a Franz-type vertical diffusion system with lidocaine hydrochloride (LDC). <i>In vitro</i> mucoadhesion assays were conducted using fresh nasal mucosa and a commercial nasal topical formulation using TA.XT. Plus texture analyzer. The variables involved (probe speed, contact time, and application force) in assessing mucoadhesive capacity (maximum mucoadhesive force F<sub>max</sub> and work of mucoadhesion W<sub>muc</sub>) were optimized using a Central Composite Design. Fresh tissues showed no alterations in histological arrangement or in the ultrastructure of adherence junctions. Stored tissues exhibited histological disorganization, reduced thickness, and loss of epithelial integrity. LDC permeability increased in storage tissues (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Contact force had a positive effect on F<sub>max</sub> and W<sub>muc</sub> (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), with a minimum required value of 0.48 N. Variations in contact time and probe speed did not affect the responses (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). In conclusion, the preparation technique was adequate to maintain mucosa integrity for permeability studies. However, storing the mucosa at 4 or -20°C overestimated LDC permeation, which could mislead critical data for formulation development. Therefore, the use of fresh mucosa is recommended to ensure more reliable results. For <i>in vitro</i> mucoadhesion assays, a minimum contact force of 0.48N is required for optimal responses.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AAPS PharmSciTech\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AAPS PharmSciTech\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1208/s12249-024-03002-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS PharmSciTech","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1208/s12249-024-03002-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鼻内局部给药为局部和全身给药提供了一种很有前途的途径,体外渗透和黏附研究通常使用猪模型。然而,手术后储存对粘膜完整性的影响仍未得到解决。本研究旨在规范猪鼻黏膜的制备工艺,并评估猪鼻黏膜的保存是否会损害其完整性和通透性,以进行实验比较。此外,利用织构分析仪对体外黏附实验进行了优化。猪鼻黏膜在不同的储存条件下(“新鲜”;在4°C冷藏24小时和48小时,在-20°C冷冻两到三周),并使用光学和透射电子显微镜进行评估。采用盐酸利多卡因(LDC)在franz型垂直扩散系统中进行体外渗透试验。使用新鲜鼻黏膜和使用TA.XT的商业鼻外用制剂进行体外黏附试验。加上纹理分析器。使用中心复合设计对评估粘接能力(最大粘接力Fmax和粘接功Wmuc)所涉及的变量(探针速度、接触时间和施加力)进行优化。新鲜组织的组织学排列和粘附连接处的超微结构未见改变。储存的组织表现出组织学紊乱、厚度减少和上皮完整性丧失。贮藏组织ldl通透性增高(p < 0.05)。接触力对Fmax和Wmuc有正向影响(p < 0.0001),最小要求值为0.48 n。接触时间和探针速度的变化对响应没有影响(p > 0.05)。总之,制备技术足以维持粘膜的完整性,以进行通透性研究。然而,在4°C或-20°C下储存粘膜会高估最不透细胞的渗透,这可能会误导配方开发的关键数据。因此,建议使用新鲜黏膜,以确保更可靠的结果。对于体外黏附试验,最小接触力为0.48N即可获得最佳反应。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Storage on In Vitro Permeation and Mucoadhesion Setup Experiments Using Swine Nasal Mucosa

Intranasal topical administration offers a promising route for local and systemic drug delivery, with in vitro permeation and mucoadhesion studies often using porcine models. However, the impact of storage on mucosal integrity after the procedure remains unaddressed. This study aimed to standardize the preparation process and evaluated whether storage of porcine nasal mucosa impairs its integrity and permeability for experimental comparisons. Additionally, an optimized in vitro mucoadhesion experiment using texture analyzer equipment was investigated. Porcine nasal mucosa was subjected to different storage conditions ("fresh"; refrigerated at 4°C for 24 h and 48 h, and frozen at -20°C for two or three weeks) and assessed using optical and transmission electron microscopy. In vitro permeation assays were performed in a Franz-type vertical diffusion system with lidocaine hydrochloride (LDC). In vitro mucoadhesion assays were conducted using fresh nasal mucosa and a commercial nasal topical formulation using TA.XT. Plus texture analyzer. The variables involved (probe speed, contact time, and application force) in assessing mucoadhesive capacity (maximum mucoadhesive force Fmax and work of mucoadhesion Wmuc) were optimized using a Central Composite Design. Fresh tissues showed no alterations in histological arrangement or in the ultrastructure of adherence junctions. Stored tissues exhibited histological disorganization, reduced thickness, and loss of epithelial integrity. LDC permeability increased in storage tissues (p < 0.05). Contact force had a positive effect on Fmax and Wmuc (p < 0.0001), with a minimum required value of 0.48 N. Variations in contact time and probe speed did not affect the responses (p > 0.05). In conclusion, the preparation technique was adequate to maintain mucosa integrity for permeability studies. However, storing the mucosa at 4 or -20°C overestimated LDC permeation, which could mislead critical data for formulation development. Therefore, the use of fresh mucosa is recommended to ensure more reliable results. For in vitro mucoadhesion assays, a minimum contact force of 0.48N is required for optimal responses.

Graphical Abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AAPS PharmSciTech
AAPS PharmSciTech 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
264
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: AAPS PharmSciTech is a peer-reviewed, online-only journal committed to serving those pharmaceutical scientists and engineers interested in the research, development, and evaluation of pharmaceutical dosage forms and delivery systems, including drugs derived from biotechnology and the manufacturing science pertaining to the commercialization of such dosage forms. Because of its electronic nature, AAPS PharmSciTech aspires to utilize evolving electronic technology to enable faster and diverse mechanisms of information delivery to its readership. Submission of uninvited expert reviews and research articles are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信