新兴成人日常生活中的社交媒体活动与情感幸福感

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Giselle Ferguson, Mariah T. Hawes, Jacqueline Mogle, Stacey B. Scott, Daniel N. Klein
{"title":"新兴成人日常生活中的社交媒体活动与情感幸福感","authors":"Giselle Ferguson,&nbsp;Mariah T. Hawes,&nbsp;Jacqueline Mogle,&nbsp;Stacey B. Scott,&nbsp;Daniel N. Klein","doi":"10.1007/s42761-024-00251-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous work suggests that some social media (SM) activities may have detrimental effects on users’ affective well-being, whereas other activities can be more adaptive. SM use is typically assessed with global or retrospective measures; it remains unclear how its relation with affect may play out in real-time and in regard to specific SM activities, as opposed to general SM use. The current study investigated the association between specific SM activities (posting, viewing others’ posts, liking/commenting, checking replies to one’s own posts, direct messaging) and concurrent positive and negative affect in a sample of <i>n</i> = 349 18-year-old emerging adults. Participants reported SM activities and affect up to five times per day for 14 days. Using parallel multilevel models, we found significant within-person associations between positive affect and certain SM activities: participants’ positive affect was lower at times when they reported liking/commenting or viewing, and was higher when they reported direct messaging or posting, than at times when they were not engaging in these SM activities. In between-persons, only viewing was related to positive affect; individuals who more frequently viewed others’ posts had lower positive affect on average. Negative affect did not relate to any SM activities within-persons or between-persons. In sum, these results suggest specificity—in which SM activities link with affective well-being, in the correlational direction of those links, and in links mostly with positive affect—and that effects unfold within-persons in daily life but may not be detectable in terms of individual differences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72119,"journal":{"name":"Affective science","volume":"5 4","pages":"358 - 365"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42761-024-00251-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Media Activities and Affective Well-being in the Daily Life of Emerging Adults\",\"authors\":\"Giselle Ferguson,&nbsp;Mariah T. Hawes,&nbsp;Jacqueline Mogle,&nbsp;Stacey B. Scott,&nbsp;Daniel N. Klein\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42761-024-00251-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Previous work suggests that some social media (SM) activities may have detrimental effects on users’ affective well-being, whereas other activities can be more adaptive. SM use is typically assessed with global or retrospective measures; it remains unclear how its relation with affect may play out in real-time and in regard to specific SM activities, as opposed to general SM use. The current study investigated the association between specific SM activities (posting, viewing others’ posts, liking/commenting, checking replies to one’s own posts, direct messaging) and concurrent positive and negative affect in a sample of <i>n</i> = 349 18-year-old emerging adults. Participants reported SM activities and affect up to five times per day for 14 days. Using parallel multilevel models, we found significant within-person associations between positive affect and certain SM activities: participants’ positive affect was lower at times when they reported liking/commenting or viewing, and was higher when they reported direct messaging or posting, than at times when they were not engaging in these SM activities. In between-persons, only viewing was related to positive affect; individuals who more frequently viewed others’ posts had lower positive affect on average. Negative affect did not relate to any SM activities within-persons or between-persons. In sum, these results suggest specificity—in which SM activities link with affective well-being, in the correlational direction of those links, and in links mostly with positive affect—and that effects unfold within-persons in daily life but may not be detectable in terms of individual differences.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Affective science\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"358 - 365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42761-024-00251-3.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Affective science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42761-024-00251-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affective science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42761-024-00251-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究表明,一些社交媒体活动可能对用户的情感幸福感产生不利影响,而其他活动则更具适应性。SM使用情况通常通过全球或回顾性措施进行评估;目前还不清楚它与情感的关系是如何在实时和特定的SM活动中发挥作用的,而不是一般的SM使用。目前的研究调查了特定的SM活动(发帖、查看别人的帖子、点赞/评论、查看自己帖子的回复、直接发消息)与同时产生的积极和消极影响之间的关系,研究对象是349名18岁的新成人。参与者报告了SM活动和影响,每天多达5次,持续14天。使用平行多层次模型,我们发现积极情感与某些SM活动之间存在显著的个人内部关联:当参与者报告点赞/评论或观看时,他们的积极情感较低,而当他们报告直接发送消息或发帖时,他们的积极情感高于不参与这些SM活动时。在人与人之间,只有观看与积极情绪有关;平均而言,经常浏览他人帖子的人的积极影响较低。消极情绪与人体内或人与人之间的SM活动无关。总而言之,这些结果表明SM活动与情感幸福感相关的特殊性,在这些联系的相关方向上,在积极影响的联系上,这种影响在日常生活中在人体内展开,但在个体差异方面可能无法检测到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Media Activities and Affective Well-being in the Daily Life of Emerging Adults

Previous work suggests that some social media (SM) activities may have detrimental effects on users’ affective well-being, whereas other activities can be more adaptive. SM use is typically assessed with global or retrospective measures; it remains unclear how its relation with affect may play out in real-time and in regard to specific SM activities, as opposed to general SM use. The current study investigated the association between specific SM activities (posting, viewing others’ posts, liking/commenting, checking replies to one’s own posts, direct messaging) and concurrent positive and negative affect in a sample of n = 349 18-year-old emerging adults. Participants reported SM activities and affect up to five times per day for 14 days. Using parallel multilevel models, we found significant within-person associations between positive affect and certain SM activities: participants’ positive affect was lower at times when they reported liking/commenting or viewing, and was higher when they reported direct messaging or posting, than at times when they were not engaging in these SM activities. In between-persons, only viewing was related to positive affect; individuals who more frequently viewed others’ posts had lower positive affect on average. Negative affect did not relate to any SM activities within-persons or between-persons. In sum, these results suggest specificity—in which SM activities link with affective well-being, in the correlational direction of those links, and in links mostly with positive affect—and that effects unfold within-persons in daily life but may not be detectable in terms of individual differences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信