[PEDOMETER®移动应用程序在心脏康复中评估心肺健康和疲劳抵抗的有效性][初步研究]。

Miguel Gómez-Alguacil, Virginia Llanos-Ruíz, Leire Moreno-Galdós, María Madrigal-Azcona, Antonio López-Román, Roberto Cano-de-la-Cuerda, Isabel M Alguacil-Diego
{"title":"[PEDOMETER®移动应用程序在心脏康复中评估心肺健康和疲劳抵抗的有效性][初步研究]。","authors":"Miguel Gómez-Alguacil, Virginia Llanos-Ruíz, Leire Moreno-Galdós, María Madrigal-Azcona, Antonio López-Román, Roberto Cano-de-la-Cuerda, Isabel M Alguacil-Diego","doi":"10.23938/ASSN.1078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A mobile application (app) may facilitate the administration of the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), a commonly used tool in cardiac rehabilitation. This pilot study, conducted with cardiac rehabilitation patients, aimed to evaluate: 1) the criterion validity of the PEDOMETER® app compared to the 6MWT in assessing cardiorespiratory fitness and fatigue resistance, and 2) the construct validity of the PEDOMETER ® app in relation to the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Health Index of the EuroQol-5D 3L questionnaire (EQ-5D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation at HM Puerta del Sur Hospital (Mostoles, Spain) performed the 6MWT while using the PEDOMETER ® app on a smartphone worn on their arm. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the relationship between the distance recorded in meters during the 6MWT and that recorded by the app, as well as between the app and the anxiety and depression dimensions of the HADS, and the Health Index EQ-5D.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The criterion validity of the 6MWT and the PEDOMETER ® app was excellent (r = 0.981; p < 0.001). Regarding construct validity, the app showed a moderate negative correlation with the depression dimension of the HADS (r= -0.493), but not with the anxiety dimension or the EQ-5D.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The free PEDOMETER ® app demonstrates excellent criterion validity when compared to the 6MWT. The app shows a moderate negative correlation with the depression dimension of the HADS.</p>","PeriodicalId":500996,"journal":{"name":"Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra","volume":"47 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11682700/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Validity of the PEDOMETER® mobile application for evaluating cardiorespiratory fitness and fatigue resistance in cardiac rehabilitation. A pilot study].\",\"authors\":\"Miguel Gómez-Alguacil, Virginia Llanos-Ruíz, Leire Moreno-Galdós, María Madrigal-Azcona, Antonio López-Román, Roberto Cano-de-la-Cuerda, Isabel M Alguacil-Diego\",\"doi\":\"10.23938/ASSN.1078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A mobile application (app) may facilitate the administration of the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), a commonly used tool in cardiac rehabilitation. This pilot study, conducted with cardiac rehabilitation patients, aimed to evaluate: 1) the criterion validity of the PEDOMETER® app compared to the 6MWT in assessing cardiorespiratory fitness and fatigue resistance, and 2) the construct validity of the PEDOMETER ® app in relation to the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Health Index of the EuroQol-5D 3L questionnaire (EQ-5D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation at HM Puerta del Sur Hospital (Mostoles, Spain) performed the 6MWT while using the PEDOMETER ® app on a smartphone worn on their arm. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the relationship between the distance recorded in meters during the 6MWT and that recorded by the app, as well as between the app and the anxiety and depression dimensions of the HADS, and the Health Index EQ-5D.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The criterion validity of the 6MWT and the PEDOMETER ® app was excellent (r = 0.981; p < 0.001). Regarding construct validity, the app showed a moderate negative correlation with the depression dimension of the HADS (r= -0.493), but not with the anxiety dimension or the EQ-5D.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The free PEDOMETER ® app demonstrates excellent criterion validity when compared to the 6MWT. The app shows a moderate negative correlation with the depression dimension of the HADS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":500996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra\",\"volume\":\"47 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11682700/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.1078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.1078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:移动应用程序(app)可以方便6分钟步行测试(6MWT)的管理,这是心脏康复中常用的工具。这项对心脏康复患者进行的初步研究旨在评估:1)PEDOMETER®应用程序与6MWT相比在评估心肺健康和疲劳抵抗方面的标准效度,以及2)PEDOMETER®应用程序与医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)和EuroQol-5D 3L问卷健康指数(EQ-5D)相关的结构效度。方法:20名在HM Puerta del Sur医院(Mostoles, Spain)接受心脏康复的患者在手臂上佩戴智能手机上的PEDOMETER®应用程序进行6MWT。计算Pearson相关系数,评估6MWT期间以米为单位记录的距离与应用程序记录的距离之间的关系,以及应用程序与HADS的焦虑和抑郁维度以及健康指数EQ-5D之间的关系。结果:6MWT和PEDOMETER®应用程序的标准效度极佳(r = 0.981;P < 0.001)。在构念效度方面,app与HADS的抑郁维度呈中度负相关(r= -0.493),但与焦虑维度和EQ-5D不相关。结论:与6MWT相比,免费的PEDOMETER®应用程序具有出色的标准有效性。该应用与HADS的抑郁维度呈中度负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Validity of the PEDOMETER® mobile application for evaluating cardiorespiratory fitness and fatigue resistance in cardiac rehabilitation. A pilot study].

Background: A mobile application (app) may facilitate the administration of the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), a commonly used tool in cardiac rehabilitation. This pilot study, conducted with cardiac rehabilitation patients, aimed to evaluate: 1) the criterion validity of the PEDOMETER® app compared to the 6MWT in assessing cardiorespiratory fitness and fatigue resistance, and 2) the construct validity of the PEDOMETER ® app in relation to the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Health Index of the EuroQol-5D 3L questionnaire (EQ-5D).

Methods: Twenty patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation at HM Puerta del Sur Hospital (Mostoles, Spain) performed the 6MWT while using the PEDOMETER ® app on a smartphone worn on their arm. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the relationship between the distance recorded in meters during the 6MWT and that recorded by the app, as well as between the app and the anxiety and depression dimensions of the HADS, and the Health Index EQ-5D.

Results: The criterion validity of the 6MWT and the PEDOMETER ® app was excellent (r = 0.981; p < 0.001). Regarding construct validity, the app showed a moderate negative correlation with the depression dimension of the HADS (r= -0.493), but not with the anxiety dimension or the EQ-5D.

Conclusions: The free PEDOMETER ® app demonstrates excellent criterion validity when compared to the 6MWT. The app shows a moderate negative correlation with the depression dimension of the HADS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信