阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)提供者与康复法庭的经验:影响机构间合作的个人和系统因素的定性研究。

Ekaterina Pivovarova, Faye S Taxman, Alexandra K Boland, Barbara Andraka-Christou, Barbara A De La Cruz, David Smelson, Stephenie C Lemon, Peter D Friedmann
{"title":"阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)提供者与康复法庭的经验:影响机构间合作的个人和系统因素的定性研究。","authors":"Ekaterina Pivovarova, Faye S Taxman, Alexandra K Boland, Barbara Andraka-Christou, Barbara A De La Cruz, David Smelson, Stephenie C Lemon, Peter D Friedmann","doi":"10.1177/29767342241297745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recovery courts mandate substance use disorder treatment as an alternative to prosecution or incarceration but lack internal resources to offer treatment. Hence, recovery courts must rely on community-based providers to ensure access to care. Interagency collaborations between recovery courts and providers of medications for opioid use disorders (MOUD) are often challenging. This qualitative study aimed to understand community-based MOUD providers' perspectives on collaboration with recovery courts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured, hourlong interviews were conducted with 24 providers from 11 community agencies about their experiences and perceptions of working with recovery courts. Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research informed study design, coding, and analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the individual-level domain, lack of knowledge about recovery courts and overall negative impressions of the criminal legal system were impediments to collaboration. Inner setting factors such as staffing shortages and provider roles in establishing therapeutic relationships limited active engagement in interagency collaboration. Outer setting domains such as communication barriers (eg, requirement of multiple release forms, lack of knowledge about who needed what information and when) and nonresponse from the courts were frequently referenced. Providers, however, also noted that direct experience with recovery court staff, especially in person, and recognition of mutual agency goals to ensure individuals receive proper care and remain in the community served as facilitators.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While interagency collaboration is essential to ensuring that individuals in recovery courts can access MOUD, providers identify individual- and system-level barriers that impact collaboration with recovery courts. Results from providers mirror findings from recovery court staff that note communication barriers, distrust toward external agencies, and limited resources for active collaboration. Findings highlight areas where implementation strategies to improve collaboration can be targeted to ensure that individuals in recovery courts can access and remain in MOUD treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":" ","pages":"29767342241297745"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medication for Opioid Use Disorders (MOUD) Providers' Experiences with Recovery Courts: Qualitative Study of Individual and Systemic Factors Impacting Interagency Collaboration.\",\"authors\":\"Ekaterina Pivovarova, Faye S Taxman, Alexandra K Boland, Barbara Andraka-Christou, Barbara A De La Cruz, David Smelson, Stephenie C Lemon, Peter D Friedmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/29767342241297745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recovery courts mandate substance use disorder treatment as an alternative to prosecution or incarceration but lack internal resources to offer treatment. Hence, recovery courts must rely on community-based providers to ensure access to care. Interagency collaborations between recovery courts and providers of medications for opioid use disorders (MOUD) are often challenging. This qualitative study aimed to understand community-based MOUD providers' perspectives on collaboration with recovery courts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured, hourlong interviews were conducted with 24 providers from 11 community agencies about their experiences and perceptions of working with recovery courts. Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research informed study design, coding, and analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the individual-level domain, lack of knowledge about recovery courts and overall negative impressions of the criminal legal system were impediments to collaboration. Inner setting factors such as staffing shortages and provider roles in establishing therapeutic relationships limited active engagement in interagency collaboration. Outer setting domains such as communication barriers (eg, requirement of multiple release forms, lack of knowledge about who needed what information and when) and nonresponse from the courts were frequently referenced. Providers, however, also noted that direct experience with recovery court staff, especially in person, and recognition of mutual agency goals to ensure individuals receive proper care and remain in the community served as facilitators.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While interagency collaboration is essential to ensuring that individuals in recovery courts can access MOUD, providers identify individual- and system-level barriers that impact collaboration with recovery courts. Results from providers mirror findings from recovery court staff that note communication barriers, distrust toward external agencies, and limited resources for active collaboration. Findings highlight areas where implementation strategies to improve collaboration can be targeted to ensure that individuals in recovery courts can access and remain in MOUD treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Substance use & addiction journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"29767342241297745\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Substance use & addiction journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342241297745\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342241297745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:康复法庭将药物使用障碍治疗作为起诉或监禁的替代方案,但缺乏内部资源来提供治疗。因此,康复法庭必须依靠以社区为基础的提供者来确保获得护理。康复法院和阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)药物提供者之间的机构间合作往往具有挑战性。本定性研究旨在了解基于社区的mod提供者与康复法院合作的观点。方法:对来自11个社区机构的24名服务提供者进行了半结构化的一小时访谈,询问他们与康复法庭合作的经验和看法。实施研究综合框架为研究设计、编码和分析提供了信息。结果:在个人层面,缺乏对赔偿法院的了解和对刑事法律制度的整体负面印象是阻碍合作的因素。内部环境因素,如人员短缺和提供者在建立治疗关系方面的作用,限制了机构间合作的积极参与。外部设置领域,如沟通障碍(例如,要求多种释放形式,不知道谁需要什么信息和何时需要)和法院的不回应是经常被提及的。然而,提供者也注意到,与康复法庭工作人员的直接经验,特别是面对面的经验,以及对机构共同目标的认识,以确保个人得到适当的照顾,并留在社区作为促进者。讨论:虽然机构间合作对于确保康复法庭中的个人能够访问mod至关重要,但供应商确定了影响与康复法庭合作的个人和系统层面的障碍。提供者的结果反映了康复法庭工作人员的发现,他们注意到沟通障碍,对外部机构的不信任,以及积极合作的资源有限。调查结果强调了可以有针对性地制定实施战略以改善合作的领域,以确保康复法庭中的个人能够获得并继续接受mod治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medication for Opioid Use Disorders (MOUD) Providers' Experiences with Recovery Courts: Qualitative Study of Individual and Systemic Factors Impacting Interagency Collaboration.

Background: Recovery courts mandate substance use disorder treatment as an alternative to prosecution or incarceration but lack internal resources to offer treatment. Hence, recovery courts must rely on community-based providers to ensure access to care. Interagency collaborations between recovery courts and providers of medications for opioid use disorders (MOUD) are often challenging. This qualitative study aimed to understand community-based MOUD providers' perspectives on collaboration with recovery courts.

Methods: Semi-structured, hourlong interviews were conducted with 24 providers from 11 community agencies about their experiences and perceptions of working with recovery courts. Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research informed study design, coding, and analysis.

Results: At the individual-level domain, lack of knowledge about recovery courts and overall negative impressions of the criminal legal system were impediments to collaboration. Inner setting factors such as staffing shortages and provider roles in establishing therapeutic relationships limited active engagement in interagency collaboration. Outer setting domains such as communication barriers (eg, requirement of multiple release forms, lack of knowledge about who needed what information and when) and nonresponse from the courts were frequently referenced. Providers, however, also noted that direct experience with recovery court staff, especially in person, and recognition of mutual agency goals to ensure individuals receive proper care and remain in the community served as facilitators.

Discussion: While interagency collaboration is essential to ensuring that individuals in recovery courts can access MOUD, providers identify individual- and system-level barriers that impact collaboration with recovery courts. Results from providers mirror findings from recovery court staff that note communication barriers, distrust toward external agencies, and limited resources for active collaboration. Findings highlight areas where implementation strategies to improve collaboration can be targeted to ensure that individuals in recovery courts can access and remain in MOUD treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信