{"title":"联邦政府在解决地下水枯竭问题中的作用。","authors":"William M. Alley, Sharon B. Megdal, Thomas Harter","doi":"10.1111/gwat.13454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Groundwater depletion has been brought to the public's attention lately, beginning with a series of high-profile articles in the <i>New York Times</i>. The articles infer the need for greater federal involvement and control over the nation's groundwater. Separately, the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) formed a working group and solicited input on “America's Groundwater Challenges.” The PCAST request suggested federal actions were needed. However, many responses raised questions and concerns about the nature and scope of such actions (PCAST <span>2024a</span>).</p><p>While safeguarding groundwater is a global challenge, the most effective solutions are found at the local or regional aquifer system level. Groundwater occurs in aquifers that are highly variable in size, geology, climate, overlying land use, water quality, and water uses. The response times of groundwater systems to pumping, connections to surface water, recharge characteristics, and environmental functions also vary widely. Each groundwater system requires individual attention.</p><p>Most critically, effective groundwater management and governance require meaningful and continuing engagement of numerous local stakeholders in the decision-making process. People's diverse values about the environment, property rights, livelihood, individual and community economic gains, and current and intergenerational equity come into play, as do diverse perspectives and passions on how to balance the often-competing demands around groundwater use and protection. Communication and facilitation among stakeholders, decisionmakers, scientists, technical experts, and groundwater users play critical roles in structuring informed and productive conversations.</p><p>Consideration of these key attributes is central to achieving sustainable groundwater management. It is also important to recognize that States and Tribes have authority over the allocation and administration of rights to the use of groundwater within their borders. States and Tribes also administer groundwater quality rules, as well as federal water-quality standards if they have achieved federal delegation. As indicated by several responses to the PCAST query, any effort to impose federal oversight on groundwater pumping would face fierce opposition from states, agricultural groups, and others.</p><p>Indeed, PCAST in their final recommendations acknowledged that the federal government does not manage groundwater (PCAST <span>2024b</span>). The question becomes what is the role of the federal government among a host of partners, including state, federal, tribal, regional, and local entities; nonprofits and community-based organizations; university and private researchers; water districts; industry; and landowners?</p><p>Among the multiple ways the federal government can help are financial assistance for managed aquifer recharge, research and support for new technology for desalination, treatment, and water reuse or to reduce water demands, support for private well owners and underserved communities, public education and outreach, improved characterization of major aquifer systems, and expanded monitoring of groundwater status and trends across the nation, including groundwater levels and quality, land subsidence, seawater intrusion, and interaction with surface water and groundwater-dependent ecosystems. In addition, projects focused on reducing groundwater overdraft and emphasizing cooperative efforts among stakeholders can be encouraged in funding relevant agricultural, energy, environmental, and urban/industry programs.</p><p>Building on the National Ground-Water Monitoring Network (NGWMN) operated jointly by the U.S. Geological Survey and states, enhanced monitoring systems and data delivery are needed to better understand threats and opportunities to agriculture, energy, the environment, and drinking water users. A federally involved initiative in close collaboration with states is needed to enhance monitoring and data delivery systems. Funding and resources to academic, public and private institutions (including NGOs), and Tribes are also necessary to build the professional capacity, including education (Ferre <span>2024</span>) and research opportunities, to meet future challenges in managing groundwater resources.</p><p>Underlying all these possibilities is the challenge of enhancing “groundwater visibility” (Alley et al. <span>2016</span>). The visibility provided by the <i>New York Times</i> and PCAST provides an opportunity to take meaningful steps toward addressing groundwater depletion while respecting state and tribal roles.</p>","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"63 1","pages":"4-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwat.13454","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Federal Role in Addressing Groundwater Depletion\",\"authors\":\"William M. Alley, Sharon B. Megdal, Thomas Harter\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gwat.13454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Groundwater depletion has been brought to the public's attention lately, beginning with a series of high-profile articles in the <i>New York Times</i>. The articles infer the need for greater federal involvement and control over the nation's groundwater. Separately, the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) formed a working group and solicited input on “America's Groundwater Challenges.” The PCAST request suggested federal actions were needed. However, many responses raised questions and concerns about the nature and scope of such actions (PCAST <span>2024a</span>).</p><p>While safeguarding groundwater is a global challenge, the most effective solutions are found at the local or regional aquifer system level. Groundwater occurs in aquifers that are highly variable in size, geology, climate, overlying land use, water quality, and water uses. The response times of groundwater systems to pumping, connections to surface water, recharge characteristics, and environmental functions also vary widely. Each groundwater system requires individual attention.</p><p>Most critically, effective groundwater management and governance require meaningful and continuing engagement of numerous local stakeholders in the decision-making process. People's diverse values about the environment, property rights, livelihood, individual and community economic gains, and current and intergenerational equity come into play, as do diverse perspectives and passions on how to balance the often-competing demands around groundwater use and protection. Communication and facilitation among stakeholders, decisionmakers, scientists, technical experts, and groundwater users play critical roles in structuring informed and productive conversations.</p><p>Consideration of these key attributes is central to achieving sustainable groundwater management. It is also important to recognize that States and Tribes have authority over the allocation and administration of rights to the use of groundwater within their borders. States and Tribes also administer groundwater quality rules, as well as federal water-quality standards if they have achieved federal delegation. As indicated by several responses to the PCAST query, any effort to impose federal oversight on groundwater pumping would face fierce opposition from states, agricultural groups, and others.</p><p>Indeed, PCAST in their final recommendations acknowledged that the federal government does not manage groundwater (PCAST <span>2024b</span>). The question becomes what is the role of the federal government among a host of partners, including state, federal, tribal, regional, and local entities; nonprofits and community-based organizations; university and private researchers; water districts; industry; and landowners?</p><p>Among the multiple ways the federal government can help are financial assistance for managed aquifer recharge, research and support for new technology for desalination, treatment, and water reuse or to reduce water demands, support for private well owners and underserved communities, public education and outreach, improved characterization of major aquifer systems, and expanded monitoring of groundwater status and trends across the nation, including groundwater levels and quality, land subsidence, seawater intrusion, and interaction with surface water and groundwater-dependent ecosystems. In addition, projects focused on reducing groundwater overdraft and emphasizing cooperative efforts among stakeholders can be encouraged in funding relevant agricultural, energy, environmental, and urban/industry programs.</p><p>Building on the National Ground-Water Monitoring Network (NGWMN) operated jointly by the U.S. Geological Survey and states, enhanced monitoring systems and data delivery are needed to better understand threats and opportunities to agriculture, energy, the environment, and drinking water users. A federally involved initiative in close collaboration with states is needed to enhance monitoring and data delivery systems. Funding and resources to academic, public and private institutions (including NGOs), and Tribes are also necessary to build the professional capacity, including education (Ferre <span>2024</span>) and research opportunities, to meet future challenges in managing groundwater resources.</p><p>Underlying all these possibilities is the challenge of enhancing “groundwater visibility” (Alley et al. <span>2016</span>). The visibility provided by the <i>New York Times</i> and PCAST provides an opportunity to take meaningful steps toward addressing groundwater depletion while respecting state and tribal roles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Groundwater\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"4-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwat.13454\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Groundwater\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwat.13454\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Groundwater","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwat.13454","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近,从《纽约时报》上一系列引人注目的文章开始,地下水枯竭问题引起了公众的注意。文章推断联邦政府有必要加强对国家地下水的干预和控制。另外,总统科学技术顾问委员会(PCAST)成立了一个工作组,就“美国的地下水挑战”征求意见。PCAST的请求表明,联邦政府需要采取行动。然而,许多回应对此类行动的性质和范围提出了质疑和担忧(PCAST 2024a)。虽然保护地下水是一项全球性挑战,但最有效的解决办法是在地方或区域含水层系统层面找到的。地下水发生在含水层中,这些含水层在大小、地质、气候、上覆土地利用、水质和用水方面变化很大。地下水系统对抽水、与地表水的连接、补给特性和环境功能的响应时间也有很大差异。每个地下水系统都需要单独关注。最关键的是,有效的地下水管理和治理需要众多地方利益相关者在决策过程中有意义和持续的参与。人们在环境、产权、生计、个人和社区经济收益、当代人和代际人之间的公平等方面的不同价值观,以及在如何平衡地下水使用和保护等经常相互竞争的需求方面的不同观点和激情,都在发挥作用。利益相关者、决策者、科学家、技术专家和地下水用户之间的沟通和促进在组织知情和富有成效的对话方面发挥着关键作用。考虑到这些关键属性对于实现可持续地下水管理至关重要。同样重要的是要认识到,国家和部落有权分配和管理在其境内使用地下水的权利。各州和部落也管理地下水质量规则,以及联邦水质标准,如果他们获得联邦授权的话。正如对PCAST质询的几个回应所表明的那样,任何对地下水开采施加联邦监管的努力都将面临各州、农业团体和其他方面的强烈反对。事实上,PCAST在他们的最终建议中承认联邦政府没有管理地下水(PCAST 2024b)。问题变成了联邦政府在众多合作伙伴(包括州、联邦、部落、地区和地方实体)中的角色是什么;非营利组织和社区组织;大学和私人研究人员;水地区;产业;和地主吗?联邦政府可以通过多种方式提供帮助,包括为管理含水层补给提供财政援助,研究和支持淡化、处理和水再利用或减少用水需求的新技术,支持私人井主和服务不足的社区,公共教育和宣传,改善主要含水层系统的特征,扩大对全国地下水状况和趋势的监测,包括地下水水位和质量。地面沉降、海水入侵以及与地表水和地下水依赖生态系统的相互作用。此外,可以鼓励以减少地下水透支和强调利益相关者之间合作为重点的项目,为相关的农业、能源、环境和城市/工业项目提供资金。在美国地质调查局和各州联合运营的国家地下水监测网络(NGWMN)的基础上,需要加强监测系统和数据传输,以便更好地了解农业、能源、环境和饮用水用户面临的威胁和机遇。需要一项联邦政府参与的倡议,与各州密切合作,以加强监测和数据提供系统。为学术、公共和私人机构(包括非政府组织)以及部落提供资金和资源也是必要的,以建立包括教育(Ferre 2024)和研究机会在内的专业能力,以应对未来管理地下水资源的挑战。所有这些可能性的基础是提高“地下水能见度”的挑战(Alley et al. 2016)。《纽约时报》和PCAST提供的能见度为在尊重国家和部落角色的同时采取有意义的步骤解决地下水枯竭问题提供了机会。
The Federal Role in Addressing Groundwater Depletion
Groundwater depletion has been brought to the public's attention lately, beginning with a series of high-profile articles in the New York Times. The articles infer the need for greater federal involvement and control over the nation's groundwater. Separately, the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) formed a working group and solicited input on “America's Groundwater Challenges.” The PCAST request suggested federal actions were needed. However, many responses raised questions and concerns about the nature and scope of such actions (PCAST 2024a).
While safeguarding groundwater is a global challenge, the most effective solutions are found at the local or regional aquifer system level. Groundwater occurs in aquifers that are highly variable in size, geology, climate, overlying land use, water quality, and water uses. The response times of groundwater systems to pumping, connections to surface water, recharge characteristics, and environmental functions also vary widely. Each groundwater system requires individual attention.
Most critically, effective groundwater management and governance require meaningful and continuing engagement of numerous local stakeholders in the decision-making process. People's diverse values about the environment, property rights, livelihood, individual and community economic gains, and current and intergenerational equity come into play, as do diverse perspectives and passions on how to balance the often-competing demands around groundwater use and protection. Communication and facilitation among stakeholders, decisionmakers, scientists, technical experts, and groundwater users play critical roles in structuring informed and productive conversations.
Consideration of these key attributes is central to achieving sustainable groundwater management. It is also important to recognize that States and Tribes have authority over the allocation and administration of rights to the use of groundwater within their borders. States and Tribes also administer groundwater quality rules, as well as federal water-quality standards if they have achieved federal delegation. As indicated by several responses to the PCAST query, any effort to impose federal oversight on groundwater pumping would face fierce opposition from states, agricultural groups, and others.
Indeed, PCAST in their final recommendations acknowledged that the federal government does not manage groundwater (PCAST 2024b). The question becomes what is the role of the federal government among a host of partners, including state, federal, tribal, regional, and local entities; nonprofits and community-based organizations; university and private researchers; water districts; industry; and landowners?
Among the multiple ways the federal government can help are financial assistance for managed aquifer recharge, research and support for new technology for desalination, treatment, and water reuse or to reduce water demands, support for private well owners and underserved communities, public education and outreach, improved characterization of major aquifer systems, and expanded monitoring of groundwater status and trends across the nation, including groundwater levels and quality, land subsidence, seawater intrusion, and interaction with surface water and groundwater-dependent ecosystems. In addition, projects focused on reducing groundwater overdraft and emphasizing cooperative efforts among stakeholders can be encouraged in funding relevant agricultural, energy, environmental, and urban/industry programs.
Building on the National Ground-Water Monitoring Network (NGWMN) operated jointly by the U.S. Geological Survey and states, enhanced monitoring systems and data delivery are needed to better understand threats and opportunities to agriculture, energy, the environment, and drinking water users. A federally involved initiative in close collaboration with states is needed to enhance monitoring and data delivery systems. Funding and resources to academic, public and private institutions (including NGOs), and Tribes are also necessary to build the professional capacity, including education (Ferre 2024) and research opportunities, to meet future challenges in managing groundwater resources.
Underlying all these possibilities is the challenge of enhancing “groundwater visibility” (Alley et al. 2016). The visibility provided by the New York Times and PCAST provides an opportunity to take meaningful steps toward addressing groundwater depletion while respecting state and tribal roles.
期刊介绍:
Ground Water is the leading international journal focused exclusively on ground water. Since 1963, Ground Water has published a dynamic mix of papers on topics related to ground water including ground water flow and well hydraulics, hydrogeochemistry and contaminant hydrogeology, application of geophysics, groundwater management and policy, and history of ground water hydrology. This is the journal you can count on to bring you the practical applications in ground water hydrology.