异柠檬酸脱氢酶突变的成人3级胶质瘤根治性清醒切除后的观察等待方法与辅助治疗:一个病例匹配的队列。

IF 3.7 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neuro-oncology advances Pub Date : 2024-11-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/noajnl/vdae189
Angela Elia, Alexandre Roux, Bénédicte Trancart, Alessandro Moiraghi, Maimiti Seneca, Edouard Dezamis, Pascale Varlet, Fabrice Chretien, Catherine Oppenheim, Marc Zanello, Johan Pallud
{"title":"异柠檬酸脱氢酶突变的成人3级胶质瘤根治性清醒切除后的观察等待方法与辅助治疗:一个病例匹配的队列。","authors":"Angela Elia, Alexandre Roux, Bénédicte Trancart, Alessandro Moiraghi, Maimiti Seneca, Edouard Dezamis, Pascale Varlet, Fabrice Chretien, Catherine Oppenheim, Marc Zanello, Johan Pallud","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdae189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following large resection, proposing a watch-and-wait strategy in selected grade 3 glioma, <i>isocitrate dehydrogenase</i> (<i>IDH)</i>-mutant patients is an emerging practice. We compared the watch-and-wait approach to the standard postoperative adjuvant oncological treatment for grade 3 gliomas, <i>IDH</i>-mutant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational, retrospective, single-institution cohort (2011-2023) of 106 consecutive adult patients harboring supratentorial grade 3 gliomas, <i>IDH</i>-mutant treated by maximal awake resection and who received a watch-and-wait approach (surgery group) or an adjuvant oncological treatment (oncological group) postoperatively. Case-matched analysis (1:1) criteria between the surgery group and oncological group: extent of resection, tumor volume, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score, tumor location and size, and age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients of the surgery group (<i>n</i> = 26) had significantly better KPS scores, less preoperative neurological and/or neurocognitive deficits, less hyperperfusion, less corpus callosum infiltration, smaller tumor volume, higher rate of total resection, and smaller residual tumor than patients of the oncological group (<i>n</i> = 80). The 5-year progression-free survival (66.2 vs. 77.9 months, <i>P</i> = .713) and the 5-year overall survival (88.9 vs. 83.9 months, <i>P</i> = .291) did not differ between surgery and oncological groups. In the whole series, a preoperative KPS score >70, a total resection, and the oligodendroglioma subtype were independent predictors of longer progression-free survival and overall survival. After case matching, no difference in survival was observed between watch-and-wait and oncological treatment both in astrocytomas (<i>n</i> = 14 per group) and oligodendrogliomas (<i>n</i> = 12 per group).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Watch-and-wait following radical resection appears to be feasible in highly selected grade 3 gliomas, <i>IDH</i>-mutant patients without impairing survival both in astrocytoma and in oligodendroglioma subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"6 1","pages":"vdae189"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11606645/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Watch-and-wait approach versus adjuvant treatment after radical awake resection in selected adult-type grade 3 gliomas, <i>isocitrate dehydrogenase</i> mutant: A case-matched cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Angela Elia, Alexandre Roux, Bénédicte Trancart, Alessandro Moiraghi, Maimiti Seneca, Edouard Dezamis, Pascale Varlet, Fabrice Chretien, Catherine Oppenheim, Marc Zanello, Johan Pallud\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/noajnl/vdae189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following large resection, proposing a watch-and-wait strategy in selected grade 3 glioma, <i>isocitrate dehydrogenase</i> (<i>IDH)</i>-mutant patients is an emerging practice. We compared the watch-and-wait approach to the standard postoperative adjuvant oncological treatment for grade 3 gliomas, <i>IDH</i>-mutant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational, retrospective, single-institution cohort (2011-2023) of 106 consecutive adult patients harboring supratentorial grade 3 gliomas, <i>IDH</i>-mutant treated by maximal awake resection and who received a watch-and-wait approach (surgery group) or an adjuvant oncological treatment (oncological group) postoperatively. Case-matched analysis (1:1) criteria between the surgery group and oncological group: extent of resection, tumor volume, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score, tumor location and size, and age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients of the surgery group (<i>n</i> = 26) had significantly better KPS scores, less preoperative neurological and/or neurocognitive deficits, less hyperperfusion, less corpus callosum infiltration, smaller tumor volume, higher rate of total resection, and smaller residual tumor than patients of the oncological group (<i>n</i> = 80). The 5-year progression-free survival (66.2 vs. 77.9 months, <i>P</i> = .713) and the 5-year overall survival (88.9 vs. 83.9 months, <i>P</i> = .291) did not differ between surgery and oncological groups. In the whole series, a preoperative KPS score >70, a total resection, and the oligodendroglioma subtype were independent predictors of longer progression-free survival and overall survival. After case matching, no difference in survival was observed between watch-and-wait and oncological treatment both in astrocytomas (<i>n</i> = 14 per group) and oligodendrogliomas (<i>n</i> = 12 per group).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Watch-and-wait following radical resection appears to be feasible in highly selected grade 3 gliomas, <i>IDH</i>-mutant patients without impairing survival both in astrocytoma and in oligodendroglioma subgroups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology advances\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"vdae189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11606645/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae189\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在大切除后,对选定的3级胶质瘤,异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)突变患者提出观察和等待策略是一种新兴的做法。我们比较了观察和等待方法与标准的术后辅助肿瘤治疗3级胶质瘤,idh突变体。方法:观察、回顾性、单机构队列(2011-2023)对106例连续的幕上3级胶质瘤,idh突变体接受最大清醒切除治疗,术后接受观察等待方法(手术组)或辅助肿瘤治疗(肿瘤组)的成人患者进行观察、回顾性、单机构队列研究。手术组与肿瘤组病例匹配分析(1:1)标准:切除程度、肿瘤体积、KPS评分、肿瘤位置及大小、年龄。结果:手术组患者(n = 26) KPS评分明显优于肿瘤组患者(n = 80),术前神经和/或神经认知功能障碍较少,高灌注少,胼胝体浸润少,肿瘤体积小,全切除率高,残留肿瘤少。5年无进展生存期(66.2个月vs. 77.9个月,P = .713)和5年总生存期(88.9个月vs. 83.9个月,P = .291)在手术组和肿瘤组之间没有差异。在整个系列中,术前KPS评分bb0.70,全切除和少突胶质细胞瘤亚型是更长的无进展生存期和总生存期的独立预测因素。病例匹配后,观察和等待与肿瘤治疗在星形细胞瘤(n = 14 /组)和少突胶质细胞瘤(n = 12 /组)的生存率没有差异。结论:在高度选择性的3级胶质瘤、idh突变患者中,观察和等待根治性切除似乎是可行的,而不会损害星形细胞瘤和少突胶质细胞瘤亚组的生存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Watch-and-wait approach versus adjuvant treatment after radical awake resection in selected adult-type grade 3 gliomas, isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant: A case-matched cohort.

Background: Following large resection, proposing a watch-and-wait strategy in selected grade 3 glioma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant patients is an emerging practice. We compared the watch-and-wait approach to the standard postoperative adjuvant oncological treatment for grade 3 gliomas, IDH-mutant.

Methods: Observational, retrospective, single-institution cohort (2011-2023) of 106 consecutive adult patients harboring supratentorial grade 3 gliomas, IDH-mutant treated by maximal awake resection and who received a watch-and-wait approach (surgery group) or an adjuvant oncological treatment (oncological group) postoperatively. Case-matched analysis (1:1) criteria between the surgery group and oncological group: extent of resection, tumor volume, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score, tumor location and size, and age.

Results: Patients of the surgery group (n = 26) had significantly better KPS scores, less preoperative neurological and/or neurocognitive deficits, less hyperperfusion, less corpus callosum infiltration, smaller tumor volume, higher rate of total resection, and smaller residual tumor than patients of the oncological group (n = 80). The 5-year progression-free survival (66.2 vs. 77.9 months, P = .713) and the 5-year overall survival (88.9 vs. 83.9 months, P = .291) did not differ between surgery and oncological groups. In the whole series, a preoperative KPS score >70, a total resection, and the oligodendroglioma subtype were independent predictors of longer progression-free survival and overall survival. After case matching, no difference in survival was observed between watch-and-wait and oncological treatment both in astrocytomas (n = 14 per group) and oligodendrogliomas (n = 12 per group).

Conclusions: Watch-and-wait following radical resection appears to be feasible in highly selected grade 3 gliomas, IDH-mutant patients without impairing survival both in astrocytoma and in oligodendroglioma subgroups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信