了解澳大利亚和其他地区的全科医疗资助模式。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Winnie Chen, Kees van Gool, Michael Wright
{"title":"了解澳大利亚和其他地区的全科医疗资助模式。","authors":"Winnie Chen, Kees van Gool, Michael Wright","doi":"10.31128/AJGP-01-24-7132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Australia is undergoing general practice funding reform, with recent changes to Medicare and the introduction of MyMedicare voluntary patient registration.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Within this context, we provide general practitioners (GPs) with an explainer on health economic concepts relevant to current funding reform debates. This article outlines different funding model types, discusses the theoretical advantages and disadvantages of each funding model, and reflects on past experiences of reform.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Common GP funding models across the world include fee for service, capitation, pay for performance and bundled payments. Each funding model has its potential advantages and disadvantages. Blended funding models can minimise undesired consequences of individual funding models but can introduce additional complexity. The challenge remains to design funding models that enable access to quality care, adequately pay providers and are sustainable into the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":54241,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of General Practice","volume":"53 12","pages":"952-956"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding general practice funding models in Australia and beyond.\",\"authors\":\"Winnie Chen, Kees van Gool, Michael Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.31128/AJGP-01-24-7132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Australia is undergoing general practice funding reform, with recent changes to Medicare and the introduction of MyMedicare voluntary patient registration.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Within this context, we provide general practitioners (GPs) with an explainer on health economic concepts relevant to current funding reform debates. This article outlines different funding model types, discusses the theoretical advantages and disadvantages of each funding model, and reflects on past experiences of reform.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Common GP funding models across the world include fee for service, capitation, pay for performance and bundled payments. Each funding model has its potential advantages and disadvantages. Blended funding models can minimise undesired consequences of individual funding models but can introduce additional complexity. The challenge remains to design funding models that enable access to quality care, adequately pay providers and are sustainable into the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\"53 12\",\"pages\":\"952-956\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-01-24-7132\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-01-24-7132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:澳大利亚正在进行全科医疗资金改革,最近对医疗保险进行了改革,并引入了我的医疗保险自愿患者登记。目的:在此背景下,我们为全科医生(全科医生)提供与当前资金改革辩论相关的卫生经济概念的解释。本文概述了不同的资助模式类型,讨论了每种资助模式的理论优缺点,并对以往的改革经验进行了反思。讨论:全球常见的全科医生融资模式包括按服务收费、按人头支付、按绩效付费和捆绑付款。每种融资模式都有其潜在的优点和缺点。混合资助模式可以最大限度地减少单个资助模式的不良后果,但可能引入额外的复杂性。面临的挑战仍然是设计筹资模式,使人们能够获得高质量的护理,向提供者支付足够的费用,并在未来可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding general practice funding models in Australia and beyond.

Background: Australia is undergoing general practice funding reform, with recent changes to Medicare and the introduction of MyMedicare voluntary patient registration.

Objective: Within this context, we provide general practitioners (GPs) with an explainer on health economic concepts relevant to current funding reform debates. This article outlines different funding model types, discusses the theoretical advantages and disadvantages of each funding model, and reflects on past experiences of reform.

Discussion: Common GP funding models across the world include fee for service, capitation, pay for performance and bundled payments. Each funding model has its potential advantages and disadvantages. Blended funding models can minimise undesired consequences of individual funding models but can introduce additional complexity. The challenge remains to design funding models that enable access to quality care, adequately pay providers and are sustainable into the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of General Practice
Australian Journal of General Practice Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
284
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of General Practice (AJGP) aims to provide relevant, evidence-based, clearly articulated information to Australian general practitioners (GPs) to assist them in providing the highest quality patient care, applicable to the varied geographic and social contexts in which GPs work and to all GP roles as clinician, researcher, educator, practice team member and opinion leader. All articles are subject to peer review before they are accepted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信