{"title":"了解澳大利亚和其他地区的全科医疗资助模式。","authors":"Winnie Chen, Kees van Gool, Michael Wright","doi":"10.31128/AJGP-01-24-7132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Australia is undergoing general practice funding reform, with recent changes to Medicare and the introduction of MyMedicare voluntary patient registration.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Within this context, we provide general practitioners (GPs) with an explainer on health economic concepts relevant to current funding reform debates. This article outlines different funding model types, discusses the theoretical advantages and disadvantages of each funding model, and reflects on past experiences of reform.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Common GP funding models across the world include fee for service, capitation, pay for performance and bundled payments. Each funding model has its potential advantages and disadvantages. Blended funding models can minimise undesired consequences of individual funding models but can introduce additional complexity. The challenge remains to design funding models that enable access to quality care, adequately pay providers and are sustainable into the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":54241,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of General Practice","volume":"53 12","pages":"952-956"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding general practice funding models in Australia and beyond.\",\"authors\":\"Winnie Chen, Kees van Gool, Michael Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.31128/AJGP-01-24-7132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Australia is undergoing general practice funding reform, with recent changes to Medicare and the introduction of MyMedicare voluntary patient registration.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Within this context, we provide general practitioners (GPs) with an explainer on health economic concepts relevant to current funding reform debates. This article outlines different funding model types, discusses the theoretical advantages and disadvantages of each funding model, and reflects on past experiences of reform.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Common GP funding models across the world include fee for service, capitation, pay for performance and bundled payments. Each funding model has its potential advantages and disadvantages. Blended funding models can minimise undesired consequences of individual funding models but can introduce additional complexity. The challenge remains to design funding models that enable access to quality care, adequately pay providers and are sustainable into the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\"53 12\",\"pages\":\"952-956\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-01-24-7132\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-01-24-7132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding general practice funding models in Australia and beyond.
Background: Australia is undergoing general practice funding reform, with recent changes to Medicare and the introduction of MyMedicare voluntary patient registration.
Objective: Within this context, we provide general practitioners (GPs) with an explainer on health economic concepts relevant to current funding reform debates. This article outlines different funding model types, discusses the theoretical advantages and disadvantages of each funding model, and reflects on past experiences of reform.
Discussion: Common GP funding models across the world include fee for service, capitation, pay for performance and bundled payments. Each funding model has its potential advantages and disadvantages. Blended funding models can minimise undesired consequences of individual funding models but can introduce additional complexity. The challenge remains to design funding models that enable access to quality care, adequately pay providers and are sustainable into the future.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of General Practice (AJGP) aims to provide relevant, evidence-based, clearly articulated information to Australian general practitioners (GPs) to assist them in providing the highest quality patient care, applicable to the varied geographic and social contexts in which GPs work and to all GP roles as clinician, researcher, educator, practice team member and opinion leader. All articles are subject to peer review before they are accepted for publication.