儿童哮喘损害和风险问卷:一种复合控制工具的原理和发展。

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Miguel J. Lanz MD , Bradley E. Chipps MD , Robert S. Zeiger MD, PhD , Leonard B. Bacharier MD , Theresa W. Guilbert MD , Kevin R. Murphy MD , Tonya Winders MBA , Acklema Mohammad MD , Monique LeNoir MA , Ileen Gilbert MD , James M. Eudicone MS, MBA , Karin S. Coyne PhD, MPH , Gale Harding MA , Maureen George PhD, RN
{"title":"儿童哮喘损害和风险问卷:一种复合控制工具的原理和发展。","authors":"Miguel J. Lanz MD ,&nbsp;Bradley E. Chipps MD ,&nbsp;Robert S. Zeiger MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Leonard B. Bacharier MD ,&nbsp;Theresa W. Guilbert MD ,&nbsp;Kevin R. Murphy MD ,&nbsp;Tonya Winders MBA ,&nbsp;Acklema Mohammad MD ,&nbsp;Monique LeNoir MA ,&nbsp;Ileen Gilbert MD ,&nbsp;James M. Eudicone MS, MBA ,&nbsp;Karin S. Coyne PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Gale Harding MA ,&nbsp;Maureen George PhD, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.anai.2024.11.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Asthma in children is a leading cause of missed school days, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations. Approximately 40% of children with asthma experience uncontrolled disease and annual exacerbations. There is a need for a validated composite tool for children, such as the Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ), which was developed to assess current control and predict exacerbations in adolescents and adults with asthma.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To obtain feedback from children with asthma and their parents/caregivers to inform development of a version of the AIRQ for pediatric use (Peds-AIRQ).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Children with asthma aged 5 to 11 years and their parents/caregivers participated in cognitive interviews to elicit language describing asthma symptoms and exacerbations and to assess understanding and relevance of draft Peds-AIRQ questions. Physicians and parents/caregivers provided clinical information and performed assessments relative to the children's asthma morbidity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 60 dyads that participated: children's mean (SD) age = 7.9 (1.9) years; 68% male, 45% non-White, 32% Hispanic, and 40% with public health insurance. Overall, 53% had well-controlled, 30% partly controlled, and 17% uncontrolled asthma, based on the Global Initiative for Asthma symptom control questions. Oral or injected corticosteroids were used for asthma by 53% of the children in the previous year. Participants found draft Peds-AIRQ items understandable and relevant. Seven impairment and 3 risk questions were retained for validation, along with 5 additional items containing wording or control threshold variations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study supports the need for developing a composite (impairment and risk) control tool to assess children aged 5 to 11 years with asthma and identified suitable questions for the validation of a Peds-AIRQ.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50773,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","volume":"134 2","pages":"Pages 198-208.e2"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pediatric Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire\",\"authors\":\"Miguel J. Lanz MD ,&nbsp;Bradley E. Chipps MD ,&nbsp;Robert S. Zeiger MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Leonard B. Bacharier MD ,&nbsp;Theresa W. Guilbert MD ,&nbsp;Kevin R. Murphy MD ,&nbsp;Tonya Winders MBA ,&nbsp;Acklema Mohammad MD ,&nbsp;Monique LeNoir MA ,&nbsp;Ileen Gilbert MD ,&nbsp;James M. Eudicone MS, MBA ,&nbsp;Karin S. Coyne PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Gale Harding MA ,&nbsp;Maureen George PhD, RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anai.2024.11.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Asthma in children is a leading cause of missed school days, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations. Approximately 40% of children with asthma experience uncontrolled disease and annual exacerbations. There is a need for a validated composite tool for children, such as the Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ), which was developed to assess current control and predict exacerbations in adolescents and adults with asthma.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To obtain feedback from children with asthma and their parents/caregivers to inform development of a version of the AIRQ for pediatric use (Peds-AIRQ).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Children with asthma aged 5 to 11 years and their parents/caregivers participated in cognitive interviews to elicit language describing asthma symptoms and exacerbations and to assess understanding and relevance of draft Peds-AIRQ questions. Physicians and parents/caregivers provided clinical information and performed assessments relative to the children's asthma morbidity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 60 dyads that participated: children's mean (SD) age = 7.9 (1.9) years; 68% male, 45% non-White, 32% Hispanic, and 40% with public health insurance. Overall, 53% had well-controlled, 30% partly controlled, and 17% uncontrolled asthma, based on the Global Initiative for Asthma symptom control questions. Oral or injected corticosteroids were used for asthma by 53% of the children in the previous year. Participants found draft Peds-AIRQ items understandable and relevant. Seven impairment and 3 risk questions were retained for validation, along with 5 additional items containing wording or control threshold variations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study supports the need for developing a composite (impairment and risk) control tool to assess children aged 5 to 11 years with asthma and identified suitable questions for the validation of a Peds-AIRQ.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology\",\"volume\":\"134 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 198-208.e2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1081120624017113\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1081120624017113","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:儿童哮喘是缺课、急诊和住院的主要原因。大约40%的哮喘患儿病情不受控制且每年加重。儿童需要一种经过验证的复合工具,如哮喘损害和风险问卷(AIRQ®),该问卷旨在评估青少年和成人哮喘患者的当前控制情况并预测病情恶化。目的:从哮喘儿童及其父母/照顾者那里获得反馈,为儿科使用AIRQ (Peds-AIRQ)的开发提供信息。方法:5-11岁的哮喘儿童及其父母/照顾者参与认知访谈,以获得描述哮喘症状和恶化的语言,并评估对Peds-AIRQ问题草案的理解和相关性。医生和家长/照顾者提供了与儿童哮喘发病率相关的临床信息并进行了评估。结果:60对参与者:儿童平均(SD)年龄=7.9(1.9)岁;68%为男性,45%为非白人,32%为西班牙裔,40%有公共医疗保险。总体而言,根据全球哮喘症状控制问题倡议,53%的哮喘得到良好控制,30%得到部分控制,17%未得到控制。在前一年,53%的儿童使用口服或注射皮质类固醇治疗哮喘。与会者认为Peds-AIRQ草案的内容是可以理解和相关的。7个减值问题和3个风险问题,以及5个包含措辞或控制阈值变化的附加项目,被保留下来进行验证。结论:本研究支持开发一种复合(损伤和风险)控制工具来评估5-11岁哮喘儿童的必要性,并确定了验证Peds-AIRQ的合适问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pediatric Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire

Background

Asthma in children is a leading cause of missed school days, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations. Approximately 40% of children with asthma experience uncontrolled disease and annual exacerbations. There is a need for a validated composite tool for children, such as the Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ), which was developed to assess current control and predict exacerbations in adolescents and adults with asthma.

Objective

To obtain feedback from children with asthma and their parents/caregivers to inform development of a version of the AIRQ for pediatric use (Peds-AIRQ).

Methods

Children with asthma aged 5 to 11 years and their parents/caregivers participated in cognitive interviews to elicit language describing asthma symptoms and exacerbations and to assess understanding and relevance of draft Peds-AIRQ questions. Physicians and parents/caregivers provided clinical information and performed assessments relative to the children's asthma morbidity.

Results

There were 60 dyads that participated: children's mean (SD) age = 7.9 (1.9) years; 68% male, 45% non-White, 32% Hispanic, and 40% with public health insurance. Overall, 53% had well-controlled, 30% partly controlled, and 17% uncontrolled asthma, based on the Global Initiative for Asthma symptom control questions. Oral or injected corticosteroids were used for asthma by 53% of the children in the previous year. Participants found draft Peds-AIRQ items understandable and relevant. Seven impairment and 3 risk questions were retained for validation, along with 5 additional items containing wording or control threshold variations.

Conclusion

This study supports the need for developing a composite (impairment and risk) control tool to assess children aged 5 to 11 years with asthma and identified suitable questions for the validation of a Peds-AIRQ.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.80%
发文量
437
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology is a scholarly medical journal published monthly by the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The purpose of Annals is to serve as an objective evidence-based forum for the allergy/immunology specialist to keep up to date on current clinical science (both research and practice-based) in the fields of allergy, asthma, and immunology. The emphasis of the journal will be to provide clinical and research information that is readily applicable to both the clinician and the researcher. Each issue of the Annals shall also provide opportunities to participate in accredited continuing medical education activities to enhance overall clinical proficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信